Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 23 Jul 2010 (Friday) 18:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Zeiss Distagon 1.4/35mm T*/HFT

 
denoir
Goldmember
Avatar
1,152 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
     
Jul 23, 2010 18:04 |  #1

There is no ZE version of this lens yet, although there is a possibility that Zeiss will launch one at Photokina 2010. Regardless of that, it remains one of the most popular Zeiss lenses ever made and they are quite popular adapted for Canon. On other boards, such as FM, there are long sample threads with images exclusively from this lens, so this thread is an attempt to remedy the situation here at POTN.

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/zeiss1435.jpg

The Distagon 1.4/35 was introduced in the late 1960's and has gone through a number of revisions. The two most popular versions are available in Rollei and Contax mount. There are two important differences between them. One is that the Rollei version has three aperture blades, creating a unique triangular bokeh when stopped down. The Contax version has a more traditional 8 aperture blades. The second difference is that the Rollei version has HFT coating while the Contax version has T* coating. This has some impact when it comes to flare resistance but also influences the general color cast.

This lens should not be confused with the more recent 2/35 Distagon design - they are quite different in rendering style. Unlike the two fast f/1.4 lenses in the ZE lineup (The 50/1.4 Planar and the 85/1.4 Planar) the 35/1.4 Distagon has a floating element resulting in good performance up close. It has better center sharpness than for instance the 35L while it is comparable or slightly weaker in the corners (depending on version). It is not as sharp as the 2/35 until both are stopped down to about f/5.6.

I got this lens two days ago, so I am by no means an expert in using it, but I will post some of my early shots anyway.

Luka C.D| My photos (external link) | My videos (external link) | My Cameras & Lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
denoir
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,152 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
     
Jul 23, 2010 18:04 |  #2

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-5.jpg

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-10.jpg

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-6.jpg

Example of Rollei triangular bokeh when the lens is stopped down ( at f/8 )
IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-8.jpg

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-12.jpg

Luka C.D| My photos (external link) | My videos (external link) | My Cameras & Lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
denoir
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,152 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
     
Jul 23, 2010 18:05 |  #3

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-13.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-14.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-15.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-19.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-16.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-18.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-20.jpg

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-17.jpg

Luka C.D| My photos (external link) | My videos (external link) | My Cameras & Lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zincozinco
-Followers of Fidget-
Avatar
4,420 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: AndalucĂ­a
     
Jul 23, 2010 19:02 |  #4

cool man, I almost picked a C/Y mount some time back - looks good!!!


Living the life, overexposing...
Web (external link), Blog (external link) Name: Mike, Maik, Micke or just zinco.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
denoir
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,152 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
     
Jul 24, 2010 12:19 |  #5

Thanks :)


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-21.jpg

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-24.jpg

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-22.jpg

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-25.jpg

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-23.jpg

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-26.jpg

Luka C.D| My photos (external link) | My videos (external link) | My Cameras & Lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cholla
Member
63 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Sicily CT
     
Jul 26, 2010 05:46 as a reply to  @ denoir's post |  #6

Excuse me Sir ,

How did you get triangular bokeh shot ?

ciao



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bkdc
Senior Member
Avatar
884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Aug 2007
Location: NoVA
     
Jul 26, 2010 05:51 |  #7

cholla wrote in post #10604033 (external link)
How did you get triangular bokeh shot ?

The lens has a 3-blade aperture, and the bokeh is triangular.


EF 8-15L fisheye | 16-35 f/4L IS | 24-70 f/4L IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 100-400L II | 35L II | 40 f/2.8 pancake | 50 f/1.8 STM | 100L Macro | 600EX-RT x 3
Tamron 24-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
banpreso
Goldmember
2,176 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Socal
     
Jul 26, 2010 11:29 |  #8

the c/y mount version of this lens sure isn't cheap!

it's amazing how well these lenses hold their value. the 100mm f2 planar, 35mm f1.4 distagon, and 28mm f2 distagon. all will put major dings in your wallet!!!


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Combatmedic870
Goldmember
Avatar
1,739 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Salem ,OR
     
Jul 26, 2010 13:50 |  #9

Who...3 blade aperture...never heard of that before...That produces some interesting bokeh.. :)


Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
Olympus XZ-1
,Ryan
Sometimes, I think Photography is worse than Crack.:oops:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JelleVerherstraeten
Goldmember
Avatar
2,440 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
     
Jul 26, 2010 15:41 |  #10

That triangular bokeh is very nice!

Which one would you choose? The f/1.4 or the f/2?


-Jelle l Gear l Website (external link) l

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zincozinco
-Followers of Fidget-
Avatar
4,420 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: AndalucĂ­a
     
Jul 26, 2010 17:19 |  #11

check this out, im loosing my pants!!

http://cgi.ebay.es …m255c06e3c7#ht_​500wt_1154 (external link)


Living the life, overexposing...
Web (external link), Blog (external link) Name: Mike, Maik, Micke or just zinco.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
denoir
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,152 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
     
Jul 26, 2010 18:56 |  #12

JelleVerherstraeten wrote in post #10606789 (external link)
That triangular bokeh is very nice!

Which one would you choose? The f/1.4 or the f/2?

Difficult choice - I have both and plan on keeping them as they are quite different. The f/1.4 is really nice wide open in terms of bokeh. The 35/2 is sharper. The sharpness-to-blur transitions are different as are the colors. The 35/2 is in line with the rest of the ZE glass while the 35/1.4 is different. If I had to pick one.. I don't know. If the 35/1.4 comes out in ZE version then probably it. Adapted 35/1.4 vs native 35/2 is a coin toss.

zincozinco wrote in post #10607249 (external link)
check this out, im loosing my pants!!

http://cgi.ebay.es …m255c06e3c7#ht_​500wt_1154 (external link)

Well, that's not a reasonable price. I got my Rollei version (typically the same price as the Contax versions) for $1,000. It had some cosmetic scratches but the glass is perfect. A mint 35/1.4 typically sets you back $1,200 - $1,500. Anything above that is a ripoff - at least if you intend taking photos with it. The one in your link seems to be a collector's item rather than something that will be used.

Anyway, a few more shots:


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-27.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-29.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-30.jpg

Luka C.D| My photos (external link) | My videos (external link) | My Cameras & Lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
denoir
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,152 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
     
Jul 28, 2010 15:43 |  #13

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-32.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-33.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-34.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-35.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-36.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-37.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-39.jpg


IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-40.jpg

Luka C.D| My photos (external link) | My videos (external link) | My Cameras & Lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lofty
Member
201 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Jul 28, 2010 20:25 as a reply to  @ denoir's post |  #14

That is some razor.....and I mean razor sharp stuff there sir!!!


Canon 5D mk II | Canon 24-70 f/2.8L USM | Canon 85 f/1.2L USM | Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM | Zeiss Makro-Planar T f2/100 ZE | Zeiss Distagon 35mm T f/2 ZE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
denoir
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,152 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
     
Jul 29, 2010 08:10 |  #15

Actually, the 35/2 is sharper at comparable apertures. The 35/1.4 has the benefit of being a stop faster and has a less dramatic and more subtle rendering style. The 35/2 has a more precise, more clinical feel to it.

IMAGE: http://peltarion.eu/img/zeiss/rz35-31.jpg

Luka C.D| My photos (external link) | My videos (external link) | My Cameras & Lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

73,753 views & 0 likes for this thread
Zeiss Distagon 1.4/35mm T*/HFT
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is binyahmmad
603 guests, 306 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.