Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Performing Arts Talk
Thread started 08 Aug 2010 (Sunday) 02:26
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Justification for banning camera's at concerts?

 
Scooter ­ B
Member
33 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Oklahoma City where the pollen rushes down the plains
Aug 08, 2010 02:26 |  #1

I decided spur of the moment to catch the Bob Dylan Concert here in OKC at the outdoor zoo amphitheater. Although I do like Bob Dylan okay and respect his legacy the deciding factor naively for me was to take my camera and a telephoto lens just to experiment and see if perchance I could get a really lucky shot. For me really lucky in this case would be anything perhaps decent enough for a personal photo album.:oops:

I would not have bought the ticket most likely had I known of the Gestapo tactics regarding getting anything more than a point and shoot into an outdoor concert from the general admission "cheap" seats.:mad:

I have zero interest in publishing or any illusions of earning any money (at this point)... just a simple amateur photo hobbyist/fan of both photography and music. Realistically I would have exponentially higher odds of winning the lottery I don't play or getting hit by a meteorite. No desire to go backstage, up close, into a media pit and have the common sense/good manners not to attempt to use a flash or to block others view for minutes on end etc. Hell I think those oblivious to treating others with respect including the paparazzi or obnoxious concert goers are fair game for what they get short of lynching or being maimed permanently without a trial but that's another story.

IMHO paying $50 for a general admission ticket should include the right to take a few personal memento shots to remember the concert by after the T-Shirt has moved on to dust rag heaven..... I mean really how many camera toting typical concerts goers percentage wise (no back stage/pit access) have a realistic chance of making a single dime off anything when there are real pro's out there competing with them?

Obviously there is the money grubbing band/label management wanting all the money or power plays for complete control of the merchandising if money is being made. I just don't know anyone personally who has gone out and bought prints of individual concert photo's etc although I knew there were some pro photographers who specialized in this area and indeed were very talented at it.

Please know I admire and am in complete support for those of you that have dedicated yourselves, time, skills and hard earned experience (not to mention overhead $$$) to be paid well for your services. The performers agreed a head of time to show up, play for a predetermined price and the opportunity to sell whatever they want to the fans. There is zero reason for them to demand 100% of concert photo income shot by third parties. I suppose as a trademarked entity they have some justification for wanting a cut at some point and percentage.

But are there really no options or work arounds for someone who just want to try their hand for personal use with no commercial potential? :rolleyes:

I tried to convince the people at the gate countering the "no professional cameras rule" that they could not find a single pro photographer who would consider my EOS XS as "professional" level and would laugh at the proposition. Just another example of the entertainment hoodlums shooting themselves in the foot out of their own greed and hastening their own demise while we the fans walk away in disgust.

I think I may have been to my big concert until things change a lot.

Not that its his fault personally but if you happen to see one Bob Dylan tell him he aint the only one "not working on Maggies farm no more" and to make room for the exedous that is coming.:cool: The times are still a changing and they can kiss my you know what as its blowin in the wind their direction.


http://photography-on-the.net ...?p=8659323&postcoun​t=1957
Refusing to make waves is not an indicator of a life well lived. Refusing to make waves is the state that precedes drowning. - Paul Coughlin

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
narlus
Cream of the Crop
narlus's Avatar
7,606 posts
Joined Apr 2006
North Andover, MA
Aug 08, 2010 08:26 |  #2

this post is somewhat unintentionally hilarious, since Dylan is notorious not allowing ANYONE into his shows w/ a pro camera; he doesn't grant photo credentials anymore and it's been like that for a while.

so don't feel bad!


www.tinnitus-photography.comexternal link
Facebook linkexternal link

gear list

LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidAzilPhoto
Member
246 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Texas
Aug 08, 2010 11:29 |  #3

i agree with you, however if you take your lens and theres other photogs in the pit trying to earn a living and your photo gets used then they dont make a living. however an argument could then be made that ifyour getting better photos from outside the pit than the photogs in there then they shouldnt be getting paid for their images.

all in all chalk it up to experience and get credentials if you want to shoot in a concert next time.

ricky




LOG IN TO REPLY
ImCBParker
Senior Member
893 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Aug 08, 2010 11:58 |  #4

Most, if not all, large venues, and some smaller ones, prohibit DLSRs. Honestly most established artists do not want someone shooting the whole show. They would rather have you enjoying their music.

There are many other reasons DSLRs are generally prohibited, including not interfering with other concert goers and most of the photographers who are authorized to be there are likely limited to three songs, so why should you have greater access?

Easy rule of thumb, if Ticketmaster sold you the ticket leave the camera at home. There are of course exceptions on both sides, but if you are unsure, it is not a bad rule. Get credentials next time.


Canon 5DIII, 7D, 40D, 8-14L, 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f2.8L IS, 24L, 50L, 85 f1.8, 100L, 135L, 1.4 Extender, Tokina 16-28 f2.8, and too many lights and accessories to list.
Websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
narlus
Cream of the Crop
narlus's Avatar
7,606 posts
Joined Apr 2006
North Andover, MA
Aug 08, 2010 13:25 |  #5

kvnkane wrote in post #10682346external link
however an argument could then be made that ifyour getting better photos from outside the pit than the photogs in there then they shouldnt be getting paid for their images.

that's basically the description for crowd sourcing, and is another reason why pro shooters make little $ from shooting concerts.

if 5000 ppl bring in pro gear and can shoot the whole show, it's guaranteed that among all the pics there will be better ones than the pros can manage during their 1st three song allotment.

edit - maybe every NBA/MLB/NFL/NHL fan can also bring in what they want to the event, screw the wire/local paper/nat'l mag/house shooters.


www.tinnitus-photography.comexternal link
Facebook linkexternal link

gear list

LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidAzilPhoto
Member
246 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Texas
Aug 08, 2010 20:49 |  #6

^^ i completly agree with you, just stating that though before some one had a go at the first part of what i was saying.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Scooter ­ B
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
33 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Oklahoma City where the pollen rushes down the plains
Aug 09, 2010 00:28 |  #7

Oh well.

The only merchandising outlet I was familiar with for concert photography was in magazine, books about specific performers or a musical history kind of thing, fanzines, posters etc that all had to go through the label or artist management anyway.

I really wasn't aware there was a serious market or even a demand for more freelance type concert photo's etc.

At the moment I'm on full time disability due to a rare hypersomnia sleep disorder which forces me to sleep 10-12 hours a day yet leaves me feeling completely sleep deprived and foggy. I read up a little regarding the press passes but I can't really plan things very far out and don't have the energy to jump through all the hoops of paperwork etc to even make it appear I had any real experience to justify the press pass.

This sleep disorder thing obliterates my short term memory making it really difficult and very slow learning new things and applying them. In my former life I would jump on the challenge, hunker down and prepare for the next one. Now its kind of like having mono, that Afrikan sleeping sickness disease and a little Alzheimers all at once.


http://photography-on-the.net ...?p=8659323&postcoun​t=1957
Refusing to make waves is not an indicator of a life well lived. Refusing to make waves is the state that precedes drowning. - Paul Coughlin

LOG IN TO REPLY
ImCBParker
Senior Member
893 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Aug 09, 2010 00:44 |  #8

Sounds like you have a lot going on. We probably have all run into that scenario once, no need to get frustrated with the artist, venue, or folks enforcing the rules. There are good reasons they are there.

Stick to small clubs with liberal camera policies, you will likely have greater luck and hopefully feel less frustration.


Canon 5DIII, 7D, 40D, 8-14L, 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f2.8L IS, 24L, 50L, 85 f1.8, 100L, 135L, 1.4 Extender, Tokina 16-28 f2.8, and too many lights and accessories to list.
Websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Joined Aug 2007
London, UK
Aug 09, 2010 03:44 |  #9
banned

You may not consider your camera and gear as pro, but since there is a fine line to whether it is pro or not has to be considered by security. Entry level SLRs are simply in technologically terms near enough to pros back in the days where pro cameras didn't have half the functions entry levels have these days. Plus more and more entry levels do have movie mode on them, something bands and management don't like, unless you have their prior permission

I was almost stopped going in for seeing RHCP with my powershot s50 back in 2004, because it has a movie mode on it. When they realised that you can't get much out of it with a compact camera, they eventually let me in, telling me to go down another entrance point




LOG IN TO REPLY
skifurthur
Goldmember
1,313 posts
Joined May 2007
Living in his Nowhere Land
Aug 09, 2010 17:15 |  #10

Actually I find the above sentiment common these days. The vast majority of music fans feel entitled to whatevery they want regardless of other people trying to stop them. When you buy a ticket to a concert you are buying a licence to see a performance. You don't get to dictate any of the terms and since you are purchasing a licence, you have entered into a legally binding contract. If you don't agree with the terms, don't enter into that agreement.

As for your gear not being "professional," please note that I made my "bones" in this business with a Canon 350D which predates your camera. Sure others had much better gear than I did but I produced photos that obviously were "professional" enough to allow performance photography to be my only source of income. A talented photographer can use almost any level gear and outshoot deep pocketed people with the best of the best.


www.amsaddler.comexternal link
Capturing the passion of performance

The "simple and sweet" equipment list: 40D, 7D, 300 f/2.8 IS L, 200mm f/2.0 IS L, 70-200 f/2.8 IS L MkII, 17-55 f/2.8 IS, Canon 1.4 extender

LOG IN TO REPLY
lkbart
Hatchling
lkbart's Avatar
5 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Kansas
Aug 11, 2010 13:22 |  #11

Scooter B wrote in post #10681084external link
But are there really no options or work arounds for someone who just want to try their hand for personal use with no commercial potential? :rolleyes:

The workaround is a P&S camera - allowed at most concerts for "memento shots". If your seats aren't that great, you can always do a long walk around the hall to get a few better shots.


Bartlett PhotoArtexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ImCBParker
Senior Member
893 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Aug 11, 2010 13:46 |  #12

Could also likely get away with a Leica.


Canon 5DIII, 7D, 40D, 8-14L, 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f2.8L IS, 24L, 50L, 85 f1.8, 100L, 135L, 1.4 Extender, Tokina 16-28 f2.8, and too many lights and accessories to list.
Websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Joined Aug 2007
London, UK
Aug 12, 2010 07:28 |  #13
banned

ImCBParker wrote in post #10702366external link
Could also likely get away with a Leica.


A bit expensive, plus you will need a real good focal length, you won't get pass security with the lens you need though




LOG IN TO REPLY
brian00321
Member
102 posts
Joined May 2007
Aug 12, 2010 07:43 |  #14

400dabuser wrote in post #10707073external link
A bit expensive, plus you will need a real good focal length, you won't get pass security with the lens you need though

Maybe an E-Pl1 with a pancake on and a m39 jupiter-8 in the pocket? Don't know about mirrorless cameras in venues, but it might work. The J-8 will give an effective FL of 100mm; should be enough reach.




LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
bohdank's Avatar
14,060 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Montreal, Canada
Aug 12, 2010 08:05 |  #15

This has nothing to do with keeping food on pro's tables and everything to do with the artist's interest, or lack of, in good publicity and looking good. Many artists are very protective of their public image. No one wants an unflattering image and the pros and their employers won't post one, unless they want the word to spread and not get credentials the next time around. They have a lot to lose. A fan in the crowd with a 400mm lens has nothing at stake.

Most of the pros are working for publications that will print/write an article about the show along with a photo or two.

It's also a logistics issue. They don't have an unlimited amount of passes to give out or the pit/stage would be a zoo. With that said, I have gotten passes more often than not. It's how you approach the venue/promoter/marketi​ng/communication person and what you can offer. Always a good thing to show samples of your work so they can get an idea of how serious/good/bad you are.

Sometimes/often you won't get one and sometimes it's quite baffling. They wouldn't give me one for a pro cycling event coming next month. This should have been a slam/dunk. I wanted access to the finish line, which is the only restricted area.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographerexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

7,959 views & 0 likes for this thread
Justification for banning camera's at concerts?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Performing Arts Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00336 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is yobvts
875 guests, 539 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016