Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial
Thread started 11 Aug 2010 (Wednesday) 07:11
PREV/NEXT

Milkyway Widefield

 
AMD72
Senior Member
AMD72's Avatar
385 posts

Joined Sep 2007

Brisbane, Australia
MORE INFO

A widefield shot of the Milkyway from the Queensland Astrofest. Taken on a portable tracking mount, mounted on a camera tripod - exposure is just over 3 minutes. Lens was a 10-22mm Canon at ~10mm. Thanks for looking ;)


IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4119/4881449521_054f1eb29e_b.jpg

Aug 11, 2010 07:11

Andrew
Clicky 4 Flickr Picciesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
kezug
Senior Member
494 posts
Joined Mar 2010

N.W. Indiana
MORE INFO

Great shot...How does the tracking work? I mean for over 3 minutes, you have no blur, so I suspect it moves your camera in line with the stars due to our orbit. But as the mount moves the camera, you are able to not get too much blur on your foreground (or is that from an overlayed imaged?)

Thanks and sorry for the obviously dumb question.

Aug 11, 2010 08:18

Camera's: G12, 70D | Len's: 18-135mm IS STM, 50mm f/1.8 II | Photos:flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mjww
Senior Member
662 posts
Joined Jul 2008

Cayman Islands
MORE INFO

I'm jealous:-( Nice work!

Aug 11, 2010 08:20

Equipment list - According to the wife - "how many more lenses do you need? Yet another camera?"  ???

LOG IN TO REPLY
macroshooter1970
Cream of the Crop
macroshooter1970's Avatar
7,491 posts

Joined Jan 2007

Arizona
MORE INFO

man thats nice.

Aug 11, 2010 08:23



LOG IN TO REPLY
AMD72
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
AMD72's Avatar
385 posts

Joined Sep 2007

Brisbane, Australia
MORE INFO

kezug wrote in post #10700408external link
Great shot...How does the tracking work? I mean for over 3 minutes, you have no blur, so I suspect it moves your camera in line with the stars due to our orbit. But as the mount moves the camera, you are able to not get too much blur on your foreground (or is that from an overlayed imaged?)

Thanks and sorry for the obviously dumb question.

Thanks for the comments. The lens used was a 10-22mm @10mm so even three minutes you will not see too much movement in the foreground (which is around 20metres away). The mount is "pointed" towards the south celestial pole, and the motor on the mount rotates it at the speed that is equivalent to the rotation of the earth. The mount was borrowed so unfortunately I cannot show you a photo of my exact setup, however I found a photo of the mount on the web ...

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


...and by the way - there are NO dumb questions, however this doesn't preclude dumb answers ;)

Aug 11, 2010 08:29

Andrew
Clicky 4 Flickr Picciesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jsigone
Senior Member
416 posts
Joined Apr 2009
MORE INFO

thats a NICE mount even if borrowed!!

Great image!!!

Aug 11, 2010 09:09

My Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
luigis
Goldmember
luigis's Avatar
1,399 posts

Joined Jun 2008

Buenos Aires, Argentina
MORE INFO

Beautiful! I love the dark lanes from Antares to the galaxy center that are clearly visible in your photo!

Aug 11, 2010 09:14

www.luisargerich.comexternal link
Landscape Photography & Astrophotography
Follow me on Twitterexternal link
My Awesome Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
jgrussell
Looking around nervously
jgrussell's Avatar
18,758 posts

Joined May 2008

NJ USA
MORE INFO

Gorgeous shot.

Aug 11, 2010 09:26

-- jgr
blogexternal link | gear | my birdsexternal linkhttp://photos.jgrussel​l.com/gallery/7381653_​pK9fKexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
T.R.
Member
32 posts
Joined Jan 2010

Oklahoma
MORE INFO

Stunning!

Aug 12, 2010 06:15



LOG IN TO REPLY
Adrena1in
Goldmember
1,703 posts
Joined Aug 2007

Winchester, Hampshire, UK.
MORE INFO

Damn, I wish I could experience dark skies in the southern hemisphere. Have to rely on shots like this instead. Very very nice.

Aug 12, 2010 06:44

Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.

LOG IN TO REPLY
AMD72
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
AMD72's Avatar
385 posts

Joined Sep 2007

Brisbane, Australia
MORE INFO

Thanks all for the feedback - much appreciated!

Adrena1in ... I should point out that the centre of our galaxy (and centre of the image) was directly overhead earlier in the night ;) - you really should get down here one day.

Aug 12, 2010 09:30 as a reply to Adrena1in's post 2 hours earlier.

Andrew
Clicky 4 Flickr Picciesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
ejicon
Goldmember
ejicon's Avatar
1,880 posts

Joined Dec 2006

Hollywood, California
MORE INFO

Gosh darn amazing...

Aug 12, 2010 14:35

5D & 30D| Canon 16-35ii f/2.8 L USM| Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | Canon EF 100 f/ 2.8 Macro USM

LOG IN TO REPLY
spotz04
Goldmember
1,918 posts
Joined Mar 2010

Local Yocal, USA
MORE INFO

Beautiful!

Aug 12, 2010 23:29 as a reply to ejicon's post 8 hours earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
Shortyw81
Senior Member
Shortyw81's Avatar
268 posts

Joined Jul 2010

Milwaukee, WI
MORE INFO

Wonderful capture!!! My kit lens and standard tripod sure can't do that! ;)

Aug 13, 2010 01:15

_______________
Kristen
Canon Rebel XT | Sigma 70-300mm| Tamron AF 28-75mm f/2.8| Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 | Quantaray 500-1000mm | Fotodiox Canon EOS Macro Extension Tubes | Canon MR-14EX Macro Ring Lite
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/shortyw81/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Sorarse
Goldmember
Sorarse's Avatar
2,193 posts

Joined Jan 2008

Kent, UK
MORE INFO

Southern or northern hemisphere, I'd just like a sky that was dark enough to allow me to make a 3 minute exposure without overexposing the sky due to light pollution.

Aug 13, 2010 02:08

At the beginning of time there was absolutely nothing. And then it exploded! Terry Pratchett

http://www.scarecrowim​ages.comexternal link
Canon PowerShot G2

LOG IN TO REPLY

2,197 views & 0 likes for this thread
Milkyway Widefield
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00078 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Roots1904
809 guests, 606 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014