Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing
Thread started 25 Aug 2010 (Wednesday) 23:43
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Which settings for sharpening in LR?

 
Els
Member
Els's Avatar
246 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Victoria, Australia
Aug 25, 2010 23:43 |  #1

Which settings do you use under Amount, Radius and Detail in the sharpening tool in LR?

1) for print

2) for web/slideshows

Thanks in advance!


Els
5DII | 135L

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Racine, WI
Aug 26, 2010 00:06 |  #2

You might want to read this article carefully. It was written for Lightroom 1.1 but the principles are still the same: http://lightroom-news.com ...oom-11-update/sharpening/external link


Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,764 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
Aug 26, 2010 00:21 |  #3

Amount differs with subject, ISO/noise level and personal taste. For low ISO shots that are landscape/scenic/high detail shots I'm fairly generous with my amount, say at 90-100.

Radius I honestly never mess with, never delved into it.

Detail is pretty dramatic with LR3 -- use with care, but it could make certain things really "pop" (or it can make an image look like trash if you overdo it).

I use Masking a fair amount with high ISO images with a lot of noise, to smooth out noise/lower sharpening in areas of smooth tones and colors like a blue sky or whatnot.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,764 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
Aug 26, 2010 00:22 |  #4

I would also carefully read the LR3 Help for the Details panel, and also check out the brush adjustment for sharpening/smoothing.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Els
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Els's Avatar
246 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Victoria, Australia
Aug 26, 2010 01:04 as a reply to tonylong's post |  #5

Thanks to both of you! I will do more reading in the help info in LR (I already am reading, but not up to the sharpening section yet). You are right that it varies depending on the type of image, and I definitely want to learn how to apply the masking and adjustment brush for sharpening certain parts of an image.

And thank you for the article, PixelMagic!

So much to read/learn!


Els
5DII | 135L

LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
57,560 posts
Joined May 2007
Probably Chasing Aircraft
Aug 26, 2010 01:17 |  #6

It also depends on your final output...

You'll usually want to apply slightly more aggressive sharpening to images for print than you will for electronic viewing. This helps offset the tendency of the ink to "spread" on a print.


Jay
Crosswind Imagesexternal link
Facebook Fan Pageexternal link

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Els
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Els's Avatar
246 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Victoria, Australia
Aug 26, 2010 01:43 |  #7

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #10790257external link
It also depends on your final output...

You'll usually want to apply slightly more aggressive sharpening to images for print than you will for electronic viewing. This helps offset the tendency of the ink to "spread" on a print.

Interesting, thank you!


Els
5DII | 135L

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

986 views & 0 likes for this thread
Which settings for sharpening in LR?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00127 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
Latest registered member is Iceknights2000
968 guests, 648 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016