![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
i'm under the impression, perhaps erroneously, that shooting with ISO settings between the usual 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 doesn't give any better noise performance than the ISO level directly above. (i.e. 500 or 600 doesn't look any better than 800 since it's not one of the main "incremental" settings and actually derived through some magic in the camera's software)...
can anyone clarify this? |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 386
|
Subscribing. I recall hearing something like this
__________________
Photography is like a drug and I think I need an intervention. 50D w/BG-E2 - Sigma 30 f/1.4 - Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 - Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 - Canon 430exII - Slik 500DX and Smith-Victor BH5 Ball Head |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
no one knows?
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
Not so stupid!! Have a look at this thread 4 a start. Am.
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...termediate+iso |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7
|
Hmm, thanks for the info, still learning how ISO affects my shooting.
__________________
http://www.texturemate.com - My repository of my textures and brushes for Adobe Photoshop and Gimp |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| stupid, stupid question | doublehmom | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 2 | 25th of January 2009 (Sun) 09:44 |
| stupid question of a stupid guy(me)("Stupid Wide" angle zoom) | mantra | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 22 | 18th of November 2007 (Sun) 15:13 |
| Stupid mac question | IMARLOW | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 3 | 20th of March 2007 (Tue) 21:01 |
| Stupid Question | Evil Toad | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 5 | 21st of February 2007 (Wed) 17:19 |
| Stupid question, but not so stupid. (300D vs. 20D) | trevor51590 | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 33 | 1st of September 2006 (Fri) 21:36 |