Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Still Life, B/W & Experimental Talk
Thread started 17 Sep 2010 (Friday) 15:02
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

B&W - in camera or in photoshop

 
Createsean
Senior Member
Createsean's Avatar
994 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Toronto
Sep 17, 2010 15:02 |  #1

I really love B&W photography and when I had my film SLR I shot primarily in B&W but that was years ago. In any case I bought a new Canon 550D this week and am going to start shooting in B&W again but am wondering if it is best to shoot in B&W or shoot in color and change to B&W using photoshop.

Advice?


I'm looking for harsh criticism of my photos - tell me how to improve, I will be grateful.
My Gear | My web development business Caffeine Creationsexternal link | flickrexternal link |My Photo Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Flores
Goldmember
1,179 posts
Joined May 2010
TEXAS
Sep 17, 2010 15:34 |  #2

hard call. the nice thing about doing it in photoshop is that you still have a color image. on the other hand, if you aren't going to want color at all, letting the camera do the work makes sense.




LOG IN TO REPLY
exwintech
Gone, but not forgotten . . .
551 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Croydon Park, Sydney, Australia
Sep 17, 2010 17:36 as a reply to Flores's post |  #3

Createsean - I'll go with Flores on this. If you use the options in the camera for B&W - they're quite limited.

If you get the best colour image you can, as Flores says, you do have the colour version to show folk who "prefer colour shots".

If you do camera JPEG, it's a 'lossy' format, so convert that to PSD or TIFF (lossless) - before working on it.

However, you're better to do RAW, trim-up the WB, etc, then save to TIFF. If you do 16-bit TIFF it leaves you more options in Photoshop, but 8-bit is quite usable.

I'm using Photoshop 7 (in Wine in Linux) - but the later CS versions will probably have even more options-choices.

You can use Channel Mixer, Levels and Curves. All 3 can address the RGB channels separately.

You might begin with Channel Mixer. Open that and in the dialog (bottom left in PS 7) - there's a check-box marked Monochrome. Tick that - and you can now use the sliders to adjust the R-G-B Channels separately.

You can get it "nearly right" - Save, then use Levels and Curves to fine-tune the midrange, shadows, depth, so on. You can do an interim Save between Tools, and go back to say, Channel Mixer, for more tweaking.

At any point where the image is "about right", or you like it, but also might like to try more options - you can do a 'Save As" - filename_1.tiff, filename_2.tiff, so on.

If you Google, there are many Tutorials on doing this, available.


Gimp users might note - there is now a Gimp Plugin with many, many, very detailed functions for image processing. G'MIC has 15 Sections, each with a list of options, many dialogs with sliders, etc, using, so far, 193 Filters. Also has Effects - mirror image, put image on sides of a 3D cube, and more.

It's available for Gimp in Windows 32-bit, Mac-Intel 32-bit (Leopard or Snow Leopard), and Linux 32 and 64 bit.

Google the G'MIC Site for info and shots of what it does.

Regards, Dave.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Spacemunkie
Goldmember
Spacemunkie's Avatar
1,414 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Apr 2008
Sep 18, 2010 17:51 as a reply to exwintech's post |  #4

I'd always shoot colour. So much can be done to the b&w conversion by tweaking your colour channels - you can drastically alter the image very quickly

I can thoroughly recommend Nik Silver Efex Pro for b&w processing as well. Pricey but has loads to offer anyone who is serious about b&w :)


Scott/Spacemunkie:My photosexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Cream of the Crop
RDKirk's Avatar
11,899 posts
Joined May 2004
USA
Sep 18, 2010 18:28 |  #5

Createsean wrote in post #10928208external link
I really love B&W photography and when I had my film SLR I shot primarily in B&W but that was years ago. In any case I bought a new Canon 550D this week and am going to start shooting in B&W again but am wondering if it is best to shoot in B&W or shoot in color and change to B&W using photoshop.

Advice?

First: Shoot RAW. You can set the camera to monochrome and then see the image in monochrome on the LCD. But shoot in RAW to retain the color information.

Second: By retaining the color information, in Photoshop you can alter the spectrum relationship the same way you would by using color filters over the camera with BW film...but with much greater flexibility.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Createsean
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Createsean's Avatar
994 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Toronto
Sep 18, 2010 18:37 |  #6

Lots of advice to shoot RAW. I'm thinking I'll use the Raw & Jpeg mode, but now I need to learn how to edit in RAW - any recommended tutorials? I'm using Photoshop BTW.


I'm looking for harsh criticism of my photos - tell me how to improve, I will be grateful.
My Gear | My web development business Caffeine Creationsexternal link | flickrexternal link |My Photo Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
treck_dialect
Senior Member
treck_dialect's Avatar
689 posts
Joined Jul 2010
QC Philippines
Sep 19, 2010 09:15 |  #7

i used to shoot b&w in-cam before and to my untrained eye, the pictures appeared "muddy" and almost appeared 2d as opposed to converting in PP. used a 400d btw.


well hello
http://aleccorpuz.word​press.com/external link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Flores
Goldmember
1,179 posts
Joined May 2010
TEXAS
Sep 19, 2010 12:01 |  #8

you don't really edit 'in raw', your image software will derive an image from the raw file. any changes you make will be saved into a different file format.




LOG IN TO REPLY
710 ­ Studio
Goldmember
710 Studio's Avatar
1,786 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined May 2008
Grand Haven, Michigan
Sep 27, 2010 20:15 |  #9

Didn't read all of the replies, so sorry if I'm repeating:

What I would do is shoot in color - that way, if the shot looks great in color, I have that option at my fingers. Black & white settings in Photoshop are great! So many ways to make the smallest of changes in Photoshop, if needed. Shooting B&W in camera really narrows down your options. Anyway, that's my 2-cents in a nutshell.


=--My Gear List --=
Find me at:
Websiteexternal link| Flickrexternal link| DeviantArtexternal link | Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
telephoto500
Member
telephoto500's Avatar
150 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Sep 28, 2010 14:06 |  #10

shoot in raw, lets you recover from over and under exposure better as it contains more information. that being said, raw is in color, therefore, shoot in color.


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/138443754@N08/ (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
wizcreations
Senior Member
wizcreations's Avatar
948 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Brevard County, FL, United States
Sep 28, 2010 19:31 |  #11

+1 for Always shoot color, convert later. If you're shooting in RAW it doesn't matter though because your camera's LCD will show you B&W but the RAW file maintains all color information.


My Gear / Feedback
Flickrexternal link / Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
chauncey's Avatar
9,234 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jun 2007
MI/CO
Oct 16, 2010 18:17 as a reply to wizcreations's post |  #12

Funny that you should ask because I just got a recent purchase from amazon http://www.amazon.com ...TF8&qid=1287270936&​sr=1-5external link
It has a lot of conversion hints for different types of photographs.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
uOpt
Goldmember
uOpt's Avatar
2,283 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Boston, MA, USA
Oct 16, 2010 18:42 |  #13

You should always shoot in color. The reason is that the better image processing programs offer you different ways of deciding which color becomes which shade of grey. Even the base gimp with no new plugins has 3 different base options. I don't even want to know how many options that new plugin by the Greystoration guys has.

IMAGE: http://www.cons.org/tmp/grey.gif

My imagine composition sucks. I need a heavier lens.

LOG IN TO REPLY
uOpt
Goldmember
uOpt's Avatar
2,283 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Boston, MA, USA
Oct 16, 2010 19:23 |  #14

exwintech wrote in post #10929030external link
Gimp users might note - there is now a Gimp Plugin with many, many, very detailed functions for image processing. G'MIC has 15 Sections, each with a list of options, many dialogs with sliders, etc, using, so far, 193 Filters. Also has Effects - mirror image, put image on sides of a 3D cube, and more.

It's available for Gimp in Windows 32-bit, Mac-Intel 32-bit (Leopard or Snow Leopard), and Linux 32 and 64 bit.

Google the G'MIC Site for info and shots of what it does.

Regards, Dave.

Muhahaha. I thought that Greystoration was blowing everything Photoshop has to offer out of the water, but apparently these guys were just warming up. Thanks a lot, I don't know how I missed this.

Just the new unsharp mask with more parameters and better preview rocks. Quite a few more B&W options in there, too.


My imagine composition sucks. I need a heavier lens.

LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisSearle
Senior Member
ChrisSearle's Avatar
352 posts
Joined Nov 2007
My time is divided between Totnes, UK, Mumbai, India and The Ardeche region of Southern France..
Feb 10, 2012 03:40 as a reply to uOpt's post |  #15

Always shoot in RAW, yes of course but occasionally a camera has a nice ( maybe slightly quirky) BW conversion algorithm, like the Ricoh GRD1. Its difficult to create the grittiness of this without a lot of faffing around in LR or PS.


Chris:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jeaunse23/external link
5D Mk iii, 1D MkiiN, 1Ds Mkii. Zeiss 21 mm Distagon, Canon 24-105 L. Sigma 150 Macro. Canon 400 L. Sigma 50 Nikkor 24 mm 1.4 Ricoh GRD3 Canon G1X Fuji X100,Sigma DP2M and a bunch of other stuff.

My Sigma DP2M blog at:http://chrissearlesdp2​m.blogspot.in/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

3,401 views & 0 likes for this thread
B&W - in camera or in photoshop
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Still Life, B/W & Experimental Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00133 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Kmanifest
620 guests, 613 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016