LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 EX OS

FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 21 Sep 2010 (Tuesday) 04:37   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
howiewu
Senior Member
howiewu's Avatar
Joined Feb 2011
559 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

So what is the 120-300 f/2.8 good for? :-)

Sirrith wrote in post #12539017external link
For wildlife as well as events, you'd probably be better off (your wallet will be for sure) if you just get a 70-200 OS for events, and a 120-400 or 150-500 for wildlife.

Post #1111, Jun 05, 2011 08:28:40


5DII, 70D
17-40mm f/4 USM L, 24-70mm f/4 IS USM L, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS USM L, 24mm f/3.5 TS-E L, 35mm f/2, 50mm f/1.4 USM, 100mm f/2.8 IS USM L, 300mm f/2.8 IS USM II L, 430 EX II, 270 EX II, 1.4x TC III, 2x TC III, Kenko Pro 300 1.4x TC
Home Page: http://www.travelerath​ome.comexternal link, Blog: http://travelerathome.​wordpress.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
genjurok
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2010
531 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Sirrith wrote in post #12539017external link
For wildlife as well as events, you'd probably be better off (your wallet will be for sure) if you just get a 70-200 OS for events, and a 120-400 or 150-500 for wildlife.

Actually I'm more concerned about the weight/size rather than the cost. After all, the two lens 70-200 OS + 150-500 or 120-400 won't be much cheaper than the 120-300 OS alone. And the 120-300 OS seems a far better lens than the 150-500 or 120-400 according to photography forums everywhere.

Post #1112, Jun 05, 2011 09:23:23


6D
Canon 17-40mm f/4 | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II
Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 | Canon 100mm f/2
580 EX | 430 EX | Pixel King Pro wireless radio trigger and receiver (x2)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Silverfox1
Goldmember
Silverfox1's Avatar
Joined Aug 2009
3,180 posts
South Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

genjurok wrote in post #12539416external link
Actually I'm more concerned about the weight/size rather than the cost. After all, the two lens 70-200 OS + 150-500 or 120-400 won't be much cheaper than the 120-300 OS alone. And the 120-300 OS seems a far better lens than the 150-500 or 120-400 according to photography forums everywhere.

If i didnt already have the stellar 70-200MKII & a nice copy of the 400/f5.6 prime this lens would be a great alternative with the ONLY negative being the weight. With that being said an economical monopod and a stable head solves the weight problem. Along with a 1.4 extender to get you 420mm at f4.

IMO get it ! :p

Regards, ;)

Post #1113, Jun 05, 2011 09:41:08


Silverfox1 POTN Feedback / TC Extender Tests / Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
Honey ­ Monster
Member
Joined Jun 2011
59 posts
Aberdeenshire, Scotland
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm after some advice. I am looking for a long lens for a 7D, mainly for wildlife in Scotland and further afield. Is the Sigma 120 - 300 OS + extenders the best use of my money or should I be spending the money on different lenses? I have used the 100 - 400 but like the idea of f2.8, better OS and weather sealing and 400mm never seems quite long enough. The weight doesn't really bother me as I am quite large myself and can always use a monpod / tripod.

If the 120 - 300 is a good idea, what extenders should I be looking at - Sigma, Kenko??

Thanks

Mike

Post #1114, Jun 05, 2011 15:28:28




LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
Cream of the Crop
KenjiS's Avatar
Joined Oct 2008
20,002 posts
Buffalo, NY
[MORE/SHARE]

I'd stick to Sigma extenders on a Sigma lens personally

The nice thing about the 120-300 is at 420mm its f/4 ;) and optically its better than the 100-400...

Post #1115, Jun 05, 2011 15:30:55


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 5D Mark III, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 OS
Deviantartexternal link
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!)external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Silverfox1
Goldmember
Silverfox1's Avatar
Joined Aug 2009
3,180 posts
South Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

Honey Monster wrote in post #12540782external link
I have used the 100 - 400 but like the idea of f2.8, better OS and weather sealing and 400mm never seems quite long enough. The weight doesn't really bother me as I am quite large myself and can always use a monpod / tripod.
Thanks

Mike

Sounds like your a prime candidate for the 500/f4 IS from your statement that 400mm is never long enough. To maintain f2.8 the Canon 400/f2.8 IS is your only option & a very expensive one at that.

You need to glance below at some of the photos taken with the 500/f4 IS with a 1.4 at 700mm/f5.6 & a FOV of 1120mm on a 1.6 crop body as you have.

http://photography-on-the.net ...ead.php?t=226121&pa​ge=104

This Sigma 120-300 with a 2X at f5.6 is not going to produce the IQ the 500/f4 IS will with a 1.4 at f5.6

Periodically you can find the 500/f4 IS for $5.5K if that fits within your budget.

Regards, ;)

Post #1116, Jun 05, 2011 17:04:07


Silverfox1 POTN Feedback / TC Extender Tests / Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
Joined Nov 2007
16,610 posts
Bay Area, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Honey Monster wrote in post #12540782external link
I'm after some advice. I am looking for a long lens for a 7D, mainly for wildlife in Scotland and further afield. Is the Sigma 120 - 300 OS + extenders the best use of my money or should I be spending the money on different lenses? I have used the 100 - 400 but like the idea of f2.8, better OS and weather sealing and 400mm never seems quite long enough. The weight doesn't really bother me as I am quite large myself and can always use a monpod / tripod.

If the 120 - 300 is a good idea, what extenders should I be looking at - Sigma, Kenko??

Thanks

Mike

Why f2.8?

Personally I would pick 500mm f4 IS if not 600mm f4 IS if range was main issue. Then slap 1.4xTC or even 2xTC. 300mm is too low a reach IMHO. and Sigma is not 300mm either more like 280mm or so.

Post #1117, Jun 05, 2011 17:40:08


5dmk3, Sigma Art 35mm f1.4, 35L, 85L II, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2

LOG IN TO REPLY
micloi
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2009
776 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Silverfox1 wrote in post #12541196external link
This Sigma 120-300 with a 2X at f5.6 is not going to produce the IQ the 500/f4 IS will with a 1.4 at f5.6

It is darn close:

1. Sigma 120-300mm at 600mm f5.6 (kenko 2x DG)
2. Canon 500mm at 700mm f5.6 (Canon 1.4x II)

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://dl.dropbox.com ...20crop%20600mm%20f5​.6.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://dl.dropbox.com ...20crop%20700mm%20f5​.6.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


And a sharpened version at 600mm f5.6

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://dl.dropbox.com ...600mm%20f5.6%20edit​ed.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Post #1118, Jun 05, 2011 18:17:04


www.michael-loizou-photography.comexternal link
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/87805817@N00/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
DDL
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2009
406 posts
Alberta, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

Trying to get some color today at Shouldice Park (unfortunately bright harsh midday sun). All at 300mm f/2.8 OS Handheld - 100% crop at default ACR sharpening.

Kid tricycle

IMAGE: http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd108/ddl_cgy/Shouldice_04.jpg
IMAGE: http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd108/ddl_cgy/TricycleCrop.jpg
Fisherman below the bridge I was on beside the Bow River
IMAGE: http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd108/ddl_cgy/Shouldice_17.jpg
IMAGE: http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd108/ddl_cgy/FishermanCrop.jpg
Dog that has obviously lost a fight
IMAGE: http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd108/ddl_cgy/Shouldice_15.jpg
IMAGE: http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd108/ddl_cgy/DogEyeCrop.jpg
Leaping Dog

IMAGE: http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd108/ddl_cgy/Shouldice_27.jpg
Pedestrian Bridge (plaque was focus target)
IMAGE: http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd108/ddl_cgy/Shouldice_13.jpg

Post #1119, Jun 05, 2011 21:00:38 as a reply to micloi's post 2 hours earlier.


DDL

GearList

LOG IN TO REPLY
gocolts
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2010
1,182 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

KenjiS wrote in post #12540796external link
I'd stick to Sigma extenders on a Sigma lens personally

The nice thing about the 120-300 is at 420mm its f/4 ;) and optically its better than the 100-400...

I found this to be the case with my non-OS 120-300 vs. the 100-400L, hence I sold the 100-400.

Even with the 2x extender, results are better at 600mm f/5.6 than any other $1,800 (lens + extender cost, purchased used last year) is going to get you. I saw a pro at a MotoGP race last year using this combo, which is when I realized that if it's good enough for someone who's professional well-being depended on it, it was good for a hack like me who just likes going to motor races. :lol:

Check the lens sample archive, if you plan to shoot outdoors under reasonable lighting, the results are great.

And that's all with the non-OS version...it can only get better you would hope.

Post #1120, Jun 05, 2011 21:35:56




LOG IN TO REPLY
Silverfox1
Goldmember
Silverfox1's Avatar
Joined Aug 2009
3,180 posts
South Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

Although i tested lenses with 2x extenders and even stacked with a 1.4, i am not a big fan of using more then a 1.4 but whatever satisfies folks in the IQ and AF performance of the respective lens is really all that matters.

Keven recently released some BIF pics below using his 60D+2X+70-200MKII so i know thru my testing the AF remains fairly responsive on this lens with a 2X and not just aiming in the bright sky as he did.

http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​049820

So how is the AF performance affected using a 2X on this new Sigma at f8.0 in decent outdoor ambient lighting conditions taking into account every body + extender combo can react different ?

IMO so far this Sigma lens is proving to be a viable alternative for alot of folks and only a few more questions need to be answered to help others to take the plunge when more copies hit the shelves.

Regards, ;)

Post #1121, Jun 06, 2011 07:50:45 as a reply to gocolts's post 10 hours earlier.


Silverfox1 POTN Feedback / TC Extender Tests / Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Muteki
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2009
198 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Silverfox1 wrote in post #12544456external link
Although i tested lenses with 2x extenders and even stacked with a 1.4, i am not a big fan of using more then a 1.4 but whatever satisfies folks in the IQ and AF performance of the respective lens is really all that matters.

Keven recently released some BIF pics below using his 60D+2X+70-200MKII so i know thru my testing the AF remains fairly responsive on this lens with a 2X and not just aiming in the bright sky as he did.

http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​049820

So how is the AF performance affected using a 2X on this new Sigma at f8.0 in decent outdoor ambient lighting conditions taking into account every body + extender combo can react different ?

IMO so far this Sigma lens is proving to be a viable alternative for alot of folks and only a few more questions need to be answered to help others to take the plunge when more copies hit the shelves.

Regards, ;)

Yeah, I would like to know about the 2x TC as well. So far, the lens looks like it does well without TC and with 1.4x TC. I would be interested in 2x TC (I've seen the photo is good, but would be more interested in the AF performance, in terms of the speed of locking into the subject and tracking movements, preferably fast ones).

Post #1122, Jun 06, 2011 11:54:14


Raymond

Gears|external linkFlickr | external link5∞pxexternal link| external linkFacebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Skraap
Member
Joined Apr 2007
92 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Video of the lens here:
http://www.youtube.com ...41D0WV2ojFw&feature​=feeduexternal link

Post #1123, Jun 06, 2011 19:07:24




LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike55
Goldmember
Mike55's Avatar
Joined Jun 2007
4,206 posts
Chicago, Illinois
[MORE/SHARE]

micloi wrote in post #12541510external link
It is darn close:

1. Sigma 120-300mm at 600mm f5.6 (kenko 2x DG)
2. Canon 500mm at 700mm f5.6 (Canon 1.4x II)

NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://dl.dropbox.com ...20crop%20600mm%20f5​.6.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://dl.dropbox.com ...20crop%20700mm%20f5​.6.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


And a sharpened version at 600mm f5.6

NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://dl.dropbox.com ...600mm%20f5.6%20edit​ed.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Amazing.

Post #1124, Jun 06, 2011 20:54:11


6D | 70D | 24-105 L IS | 17-40 L | 300 F4 L IS | 50 1.8 II | 1.4x II | LR5 | HV30 | bug spray | wilderness
Gallatin National Forest, Montanaexternal link/Lassen Volcanic NP Campgroundsexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
kirish
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2009
223 posts
Cypress, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

I don't know why but I like Fro Knows Photo. I wish he would have done some AF testing. That would have been interesting to see in action.

Post #1125, Jun 06, 2011 22:15:01


If the Mayans taught us anything, its if you don't finish something its not the end of the world.

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
765,482 views & 5 likes for this thread
Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 EX OS
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00159 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
823 guests, 518 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is ozaero

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.