Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 21 Sep 2010 (Tuesday) 04:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 EX OS

 
howiewu
Senior Member
Avatar
625 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Feb 2011
     
Jun 05, 2011 08:28 |  #1111

So what is the 120-300 f/2.8 good for? :-)

Sirrith wrote in post #12539017 (external link)
For wildlife as well as events, you'd probably be better off (your wallet will be for sure) if you just get a 70-200 OS for events, and a 120-400 or 150-500 for wildlife.


5DII, 70D
17-40mm f/4 USM L, 24-70mm f/4 IS USM L, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS USM L, 24mm f/3.5 TS-E L, 35mm f/2, 50mm f/1.4 USM, 100mm f/2.8 IS USM L, 300mm f/2.8 IS USM II L, 430 EX II, 270 EX II, 1.4x TC III, 2x TC III, Kenko Pro 300 1.4x TC
Home Page: http://www.travelerath​ome.com (external link), Blog: http://travelerathome.​wordpress.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
genjurok
Senior Member
537 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Jun 05, 2011 09:23 |  #1112

Sirrith wrote in post #12539017 (external link)
For wildlife as well as events, you'd probably be better off (your wallet will be for sure) if you just get a 70-200 OS for events, and a 120-400 or 150-500 for wildlife.

Actually I'm more concerned about the weight/size rather than the cost. After all, the two lens 70-200 OS + 150-500 or 120-400 won't be much cheaper than the 120-300 OS alone. And the 120-300 OS seems a far better lens than the 150-500 or 120-400 according to photography forums everywhere.


6D
Canon 17-40mm f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 | Canon 100mm f/2
580 EX | 430 EX | Pixel King Pro wireless radio trigger and receiver (x2)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Silverfox1
Goldmember
Avatar
3,189 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 49
Joined Aug 2009
Location: South Texas
     
Jun 05, 2011 09:41 |  #1113

genjurok wrote in post #12539416 (external link)
Actually I'm more concerned about the weight/size rather than the cost. After all, the two lens 70-200 OS + 150-500 or 120-400 won't be much cheaper than the 120-300 OS alone. And the 120-300 OS seems a far better lens than the 150-500 or 120-400 according to photography forums everywhere.

If i didnt already have the stellar 70-200MKII & a nice copy of the 400/f5.6 prime this lens would be a great alternative with the ONLY negative being the weight. With that being said an economical monopod and a stable head solves the weight problem. Along with a 1.4 extender to get you 420mm at f4.

IMO get it ! :p

Regards, ;)


Silverfox1 POTN Feedback / TC Extender Tests / Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Honey ­ Monster
Member
171 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 96
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland
     
Jun 05, 2011 15:28 |  #1114

I'm after some advice. I am looking for a long lens for a 7D, mainly for wildlife in Scotland and further afield. Is the Sigma 120 - 300 OS + extenders the best use of my money or should I be spending the money on different lenses? I have used the 100 - 400 but like the idea of f2.8, better OS and weather sealing and 400mm never seems quite long enough. The weight doesn't really bother me as I am quite large myself and can always use a monpod / tripod.

If the 120 - 300 is a good idea, what extenders should I be looking at - Sigma, Kenko??

Thanks

Mike




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
20,960 posts
Gallery: 332 photos
Likes: 1397
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Jun 05, 2011 15:30 |  #1115

I'd stick to Sigma extenders on a Sigma lens personally

The nice thing about the 120-300 is at 420mm its f/4 ;) and optically its better than the 100-400...


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Silverfox1
Goldmember
Avatar
3,189 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 49
Joined Aug 2009
Location: South Texas
     
Jun 05, 2011 17:04 |  #1116

Honey Monster wrote in post #12540782 (external link)
I have used the 100 - 400 but like the idea of f2.8, better OS and weather sealing and 400mm never seems quite long enough. The weight doesn't really bother me as I am quite large myself and can always use a monpod / tripod.
Thanks

Mike

Sounds like your a prime candidate for the 500/f4 IS from your statement that 400mm is never long enough. To maintain f2.8 the Canon 400/f2.8 IS is your only option & a very expensive one at that.

You need to glance below at some of the photos taken with the 500/f4 IS with a 1.4 at 700mm/f5.6 & a FOV of 1120mm on a 1.6 crop body as you have.

http://photography-on-the.net …ead.php?t=22612​1&page=104

This Sigma 120-300 with a 2X at f5.6 is not going to produce the IQ the 500/f4 IS will with a 1.4 at f5.6

Periodically you can find the 500/f4 IS for $5.5K if that fits within your budget.

Regards, ;)


Silverfox1 POTN Feedback / TC Extender Tests / Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
18,734 posts
Likes: 891
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jun 05, 2011 17:40 |  #1117

Honey Monster wrote in post #12540782 (external link)
I'm after some advice. I am looking for a long lens for a 7D, mainly for wildlife in Scotland and further afield. Is the Sigma 120 - 300 OS + extenders the best use of my money or should I be spending the money on different lenses? I have used the 100 - 400 but like the idea of f2.8, better OS and weather sealing and 400mm never seems quite long enough. The weight doesn't really bother me as I am quite large myself and can always use a monpod / tripod.

If the 120 - 300 is a good idea, what extenders should I be looking at - Sigma, Kenko??

Thanks

Mike

Why f2.8?

Personally I would pick 500mm f4 IS if not 600mm f4 IS if range was main issue. Then slap 1.4xTC or even 2xTC. 300mm is too low a reach IMHO. and Sigma is not 300mm either more like 280mm or so.


5dmk3, 35L, 85L II, 300mm f2.8 IS I, 400mm f5.6
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2, 90mm f2, 50-140mm f2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
micloi
Senior Member
776 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Apr 2009
     
Jun 05, 2011 18:17 |  #1118

Silverfox1 wrote in post #12541196 (external link)
This Sigma 120-300 with a 2X at f5.6 is not going to produce the IQ the 500/f4 IS will with a 1.4 at f5.6

It is darn close:

1. Sigma 120-300mm at 600mm f5.6 (kenko 2x DG)
2. Canon 500mm at 700mm f5.6 (Canon 1.4x II)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


And a sharpened version at 600mm f5.6

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

www.michael-loizou-photography.com (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/87805817@N00/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DDL
Senior Member
433 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Jun 05, 2011 21:00 as a reply to  @ micloi's post |  #1119

Trying to get some color today at Shouldice Park (unfortunately bright harsh midday sun). All at 300mm f/2.8 OS Handheld - 100% crop at default ACR sharpening.

Kid tricycle

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i223.photobucke​t.com …/ddl_cgy/Should​ice_04.jpg (external link)

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i223.photobucke​t.com …/ddl_cgy/Tricyc​leCrop.jpg (external link)

Fisherman below the bridge I was on beside the Bow River
PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i223.photobucke​t.com …/ddl_cgy/Should​ice_17.jpg (external link)

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i223.photobucke​t.com …ddl_cgy/Fisherm​anCrop.jpg (external link)

Dog that has obviously lost a fight
PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i223.photobucke​t.com …/ddl_cgy/Should​ice_15.jpg (external link)

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i223.photobucke​t.com …08/ddl_cgy/DogE​yeCrop.jpg (external link)

Leaping Dog

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i223.photobucke​t.com …/ddl_cgy/Should​ice_27.jpg (external link)

Pedestrian Bridge (plaque was focus target)
PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i223.photobucke​t.com …/ddl_cgy/Should​ice_13.jpg (external link)

DDL

GearList

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gocolts
Goldmember
1,246 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Oct 2010
     
Jun 05, 2011 21:35 |  #1120

KenjiS wrote in post #12540796 (external link)
I'd stick to Sigma extenders on a Sigma lens personally

The nice thing about the 120-300 is at 420mm its f/4 ;) and optically its better than the 100-400...

I found this to be the case with my non-OS 120-300 vs. the 100-400L, hence I sold the 100-400.

Even with the 2x extender, results are better at 600mm f/5.6 than any other $1,800 (lens + extender cost, purchased used last year) is going to get you. I saw a pro at a MotoGP race last year using this combo, which is when I realized that if it's good enough for someone who's professional well-being depended on it, it was good for a hack like me who just likes going to motor races. :lol:

Check the lens sample archive, if you plan to shoot outdoors under reasonable lighting, the results are great.

And that's all with the non-OS version...it can only get better you would hope.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Silverfox1
Goldmember
Avatar
3,189 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 49
Joined Aug 2009
Location: South Texas
     
Jun 06, 2011 07:50 as a reply to  @ gocolts's post |  #1121

Although i tested lenses with 2x extenders and even stacked with a 1.4, i am not a big fan of using more then a 1.4 but whatever satisfies folks in the IQ and AF performance of the respective lens is really all that matters.

Keven recently released some BIF pics below using his 60D+2X+70-200MKII so i know thru my testing the AF remains fairly responsive on this lens with a 2X and not just aiming in the bright sky as he did.

http://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1049820

So how is the AF performance affected using a 2X on this new Sigma at f8.0 in decent outdoor ambient lighting conditions taking into account every body + extender combo can react different ?

IMO so far this Sigma lens is proving to be a viable alternative for alot of folks and only a few more questions need to be answered to help others to take the plunge when more copies hit the shelves.

Regards, ;)


Silverfox1 POTN Feedback / TC Extender Tests / Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Muteki
Member
200 posts
Likes: 67
Joined Jul 2009
     
Jun 06, 2011 11:54 |  #1122

Silverfox1 wrote in post #12544456 (external link)
Although i tested lenses with 2x extenders and even stacked with a 1.4, i am not a big fan of using more then a 1.4 but whatever satisfies folks in the IQ and AF performance of the respective lens is really all that matters.

Keven recently released some BIF pics below using his 60D+2X+70-200MKII so i know thru my testing the AF remains fairly responsive on this lens with a 2X and not just aiming in the bright sky as he did.

http://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1049820

So how is the AF performance affected using a 2X on this new Sigma at f8.0 in decent outdoor ambient lighting conditions taking into account every body + extender combo can react different ?

IMO so far this Sigma lens is proving to be a viable alternative for alot of folks and only a few more questions need to be answered to help others to take the plunge when more copies hit the shelves.

Regards, ;)

Yeah, I would like to know about the 2x TC as well. So far, the lens looks like it does well without TC and with 1.4x TC. I would be interested in 2x TC (I've seen the photo is good, but would be more interested in the AF performance, in terms of the speed of locking into the subject and tracking movements, preferably fast ones).


Raymond

Gears| (external link)Flickr |  (external link)5∞px (external link)|  (external link)Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Skraap
Member
92 posts
Joined Apr 2007
     
Jun 06, 2011 19:07 |  #1123

Video of the lens here:
http://www.youtube.com …41D0WV2ojFw&fea​ture=feedu (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike55
Goldmember
Avatar
4,206 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Jun 06, 2011 20:54 |  #1124

micloi wrote in post #12541510 (external link)
It is darn close:

1. Sigma 120-300mm at 600mm f5.6 (kenko 2x DG)
2. Canon 500mm at 700mm f5.6 (Canon 1.4x II)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


And a sharpened version at 600mm f5.6

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Amazing.


6D | 70D | 24-105 L IS | 17-40 L | 300 F4 L IS | 50 1.8 II | 1.4x II | LR5 | HV30 | bug spray | wilderness
Gallatin National Forest, Montana (external link)/Lassen Volcanic NP Campgrounds (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirish
Member
228 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, CA
     
Jun 06, 2011 22:15 |  #1125

I don't know why but I like Fro Knows Photo. I wish he would have done some AF testing. That would have been interesting to see in action.


If the Mayans taught us anything, its if you don't finish something its not the end of the world.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,321,739 views & 348 likes for this thread
Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 EX OS
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Nidge
660 guests, 416 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.