![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
|
I like this image but the shadow on the grooms face looks awful and I have tried everything in CS5 with no luck. Anyone?
![]() |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
|
Most likely no fix. It appears that you didn't shoot raw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 991
|
I don't think it looks horrendous. Certainly not ideal, but I don't think the picture is totally worthless. Just a thought - and it may not work at all - but since you cant lighten the dark areas, did you try darkening the light areas on the guy to make it less of a transition?
__________________
Michael 5D Mark II 16-35mm 2.8L II; 35mm 1.4L; 85 1.2L II; 70-200 2.8L IS II |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Goldmember
|
It can be fixed, somewhat, but with the JPG image you won't like the results. You'll get imperfections in the image trying to recover shadows and such with a JPG. It can be done with pretty good results though, if you don't blow the image up too much. If you have a RAW it can be fixed with better results though, and probably easier than doing a JPG too.
For this shot, I opened it in Lightroom, upped the exposure by 1 and the fill by 35. I then export it as a new image so as not to overwrite the original. I take the saved image and copy it, then paste it as a new layer over the original in PSPX2. Then, it's just a matter of using the eraser tool to go over the spots i want to keep original, and then dodge the shadows to make them look a bit better. The animation makes the shot look like crap, but you get the idea. with a RAW you would have a much broader spectrum of what you could do, and it would be a lot easier to recover areas and brighten areas, etc.. with my edit it looks similar to what you might get with a reflector aimed at them from the right, so it doesn't end up looking too bad. A little bit of work to smooth out any imperfections in the JPG and it might not look too bad. But, like I said, you wouldn't get away with blowing it up very much, if at all. Sadly, there's no way to completely get rid of the shadows in the JPG, at least not without a boatload of work. ![]() ![]()
__________________
The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill My Gear - Flickr - Facebook Smoke Photography - Sound-Activated Paint |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"brain damaged old guy"
|
If you're asking for editing help, please enable "Image Editing OK" and post a link to the original image file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
Posts: 4,548
|
is it even your image? seems it was taken with a Pentax K20D, your sig says 7D...
__________________
Robert Whetton Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
DIY Monitor Hood | Gear | Tweet | Google+ | Get your focus spot on |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
|
Yeah, I had a k20 few months back. Ill try to link the raw file
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How do you avoid harsh shadows? | Kauaicrazed | People Talk | 5 | 21st of October 2008 (Tue) 16:42 |
| Any way to process out harsh flash shadows? | Picture North Carolina | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 3 | 30th of January 2008 (Wed) 05:27 |
| Harsh Shadows from trees outdoors... | CanonLaw | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 5 | 30th of July 2006 (Sun) 18:05 |
| Removing harsh shadows | Thompsunshine | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 4 | 18th of July 2006 (Tue) 18:14 |