Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial
Thread started 27 Oct 2010 (Wednesday) 15:45
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

You don't need a telescope

 
Badger49456
Senior Member
Badger49456's Avatar
408 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Midwest
Oct 27, 2010 19:52 |  #16

M31 with the 30D and Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 at 75mm on a tripod.

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4124/5060529369_d5738b2b61_z.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/nathmath/506052​9369/] (external link)
Andromeda M31 (external link) by Shaman Tanthew (external link), on Flickr

flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,396 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jun 2007
Texas USA
Oct 27, 2010 19:59 |  #17

dougj7 wrote in post #11177455external link
"The only rule for posting an image here is that it must have been taken without the use of a telescope."

I even read the rules carefully before posting. I used an astrotrac.
-Doug

Alright Doug !!! Sorry man , spoke before i should have :oops: , you can qualify now :lol: !!




LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,396 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jun 2007
Texas USA
Oct 27, 2010 20:08 |  #18

luigis wrote in post #11177741external link
Here you go:

Image Width = 2643
Image Length = 1762
Bits Per Sample = 8, 8, 8
Photometric Interpretation = RGB
Make = Canon
Model = Canon EOS REBEL T2i
Orientation = top/left
Samples Per Pixel = 3
X Resolution = 300
Y Resolution = 300
Resolution Unit = inch
Date Time = 2010-10-19 23:16:03
Artist = Luis Argerich
Copyright = (c) 2010 Luis Argerich
Exif IFD Pointer = Offset: 340

[Camera]
Exposure Time = 1/80"
F Number = F11
Exposure Program = Manual
ISO Speed Ratings = 800
Exif Version = Version 2.21
Date Time Original = 2010-10-19 19:49:49
Date Time Digitized = 2010-10-19 19:49:49
Components Configuration = YCbcr
Shutter Speed Value = 6.38 TV
Aperture Value = 7 AV
Exposure Bias Value = ±0EV
Max Aperture Value = F8
Subject Distance = 655.35m
Metering Mode = Pattern
Flash = Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode
Focal Length = 560mm
User Comment =
Subsec Time = 0.88"
Subsec Time Original = 0.88"
Subsec Time Digitized = 0.88"
Flashpix Version = Version 1.0
Color Space = sRGB
Exif Image Width = 304
Exif Image Height = 383
Interoperability IFD Pointer = Offset: 1116
Focal Plane X Resolution = 5728.177
Focal Plane Y Resolution = 5808.403
Focal Plane Resolution Unit = inch
Custom Rendered = Normal process
Exposure Mode = Manual exposure
White Balance = Manual white balance
Scene Capture Type = Normal

[Interoperability]
Interoperability Index = ExifR98
Interoperability Version = Version 1.0

[Thumbnail Info]
Compression = JPEG Compressed (Thumbnail)
X Resolution = 72
Y Resolution = 72
Resolution Unit = inch
JPEG Interchange Format = Offset: 1242
JPEG Interchange Format Length = Length: 1082

[Thumbnail]
Thumbnail = 127 x 160

Thanks for the EXIF luigis . It's an amazing image of jupiter for sure especially to show the moons so well ! BTW is this 2 different EXIFS ? The top part shows Date Time = 2010-10-19 23:16:03 and the bottom part shows Date Time Original = 2010-10-19 19:49:49 . Thats over 3 hrs difference in time . Do this figures go together or is one for Jupiter and one for the Moon ?? Thanks for the input !




LOG IN TO REPLY
Justinryan215
Member
228 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Hatboro, Pa
Oct 27, 2010 21:25 as a reply to Celestron's post |  #19

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4126/5088277596_f7998b1386.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com .../justinryansr/50882​77596/] (external link)
Moon (external link) by Justin Ryan sr (external link), on Flickr

Justin
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/justinryansr/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,396 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jun 2007
Texas USA
Oct 27, 2010 22:24 |  #20

Nice Justin , can you tell us the equip please so all will know ? Thanks .




LOG IN TO REPLY
int2str
Goldmember
1,881 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Fremont, CA
Oct 27, 2010 22:31 as a reply to post 11177741 |  #21

Another moon....
Canon 7D + Canon 300mm f/2.8 IS + Canon TC 2x + Canon TC 1.4x :D

IMAGE: http://ironcreek.net/photos/IMG_2444.JPG



LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,396 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jun 2007
Texas USA
Oct 27, 2010 22:53 |  #22

Badger49456 wrote in post #11177792 (external link)
M31 with the 30D and Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 at 75mm on a tripod.

QUOTED IMAGE
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/nathmath/506052​9369/] (external link)
Andromeda M31 (external link) by Shaman Tanthew (external link), on Flickr

I wish more ppl would post their DSO images like yours instead of just moon after moon after moon . Kinda getting boring quick looking at just moons . How about some more galaxies or nebulaes or even better how bout some star clusters . I know you can do it Badger , you've proved it ! Ok everyone else heres your challenge cause you don't need a telescope ... right ?? Just do what Badger has been doing .




LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,396 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jun 2007
Texas USA
Oct 27, 2010 23:08 |  #23

Sorarse wrote in post #11176403external link
I'm hoping that others will contribute to this thread to encourage those that have only basic camera equipment.

The only rule for posting an image here is that it must have been taken without the use of a telescope.

Hey Sorarse , just out of curiosity . If a tracking device can be used like a barndoor for example would PiggyBack on a telescope be legal here ? Like when i use my camera and lens fixed top my telescope and not throught it couldn't i just claim that as a tracking device :D ??




LOG IN TO REPLY
mtbdudex
Goldmember
mtbdudex's Avatar
Joined Nov 2009
SE Michigan
Oct 28, 2010 02:09 |  #24

Sorarse wrote in post #11176403external link
I'm hoping that others will contribute to this thread to encourage those that have only basic camera equipment.

The only rule for posting an image here is that it must have been taken without the use of a telescope.

Hmmm, "without the use of a telescope", that's the ONLY rule posted in this thread, ie, lens is a std camera lens not a telescope as lens

My take:
bad: "without the use of a telescope" = I read this as "image thru a telescope"
good: everything else (using Camera I take it, not other imaging device?): hand held, tripod, multiple exposures using DSS,tripod + tracker

Need Sorarse to define if "Camera mounted onto a telescope but image only from camera" is in bounds or outta bounds, that is same as "tripod + sturdy ballhead"


Mike R, P.E. ...iMac 27"(i7), iPad2, iPhone5s, 24" iMac, AppleTV(160), MacBook
Canon: 70D, T1i + lens:70-200 L f2.8 IS II / TC 1.4x 2x / 15-85 / f1.4 50 / UWA 11-16 Tokina
FEISOL tripod CT-3441S + CB-40D Ball Head, iOptron EQ tracker
My top 10 in Astrophotography. . .DIY acoustic panels (external link) . . APOD Aug-5-2011 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Brim
Senior Member
285 posts
Joined Oct 2010
UK
Oct 28, 2010 03:17 |  #25

HOW did that guy take a picture of a galaxy with an 28-75mm lens?....


5D, 7D, 30D. Sigma 30,50 1.4, Canon 70-200 f4, Sigma 10-20
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/markbrim/external link
Blog: http://http ...brimacombe.wordpres​s.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
monk3y
Totally Saturated
monk3y's Avatar
46,189 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Aug 2009
Cloud and Honey
Oct 28, 2010 03:26 |  #26

This is about the best I've got

D700 + 12 -24mm 30sec

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4148/4956046263_f8a02a270b_b.jpg

a shot of the moon (does it qualify? :D)
IMAGE: http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1221/4729711475_cfe8c34dab_b.jpg

www.monk3y.comexternal link | My GEAR

LOG IN TO REPLY
Justinryan215
Member
228 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Hatboro, Pa
Oct 28, 2010 05:33 |  #27

Celestron wrote in post #11178744external link
Nice Justin , can you tell us the equip please so all will know ? Thanks .

Camera Model Name Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTi
Sigma 55-200mm set at 200mm
Shooting Date/Time 10/16/2010 8:10:16 PM
Tv (Shutter Speed) 1/1000
Av (Aperture Value) 5.6
ISO Speed 100
Image Size 2845x1920
Flash Off
File Size 216 KB
Slight crop


Justin
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/justinryansr/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
archer1960
Goldmember
archer1960's Avatar
Joined Jul 2010
Oct 28, 2010 06:47 |  #28

int2str wrote in post #11178775external link
Another moon....
Canon 7D + Canon 300mm f/2.8 IS + Canon TC 2x + Canon TC 1.4x :D

That combination has more focal length than my telescope, and probably a wider aperture as well (my scope is 750mm, f/9.9)!!


Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,396 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jun 2007
Texas USA
Oct 28, 2010 07:52 |  #29

monk3y wrote in post #11179845external link
This is about the best I've got

D700 + 12 -24mm 30sec

a shot of the moon (does it qualify? :D)

Yeah it qualifies monk3y . Thats a couple nice shots especially the MW . I have one i took from Ft.Davis back in August . Turned out similiar . XSI , 18-55mmIS @ 18mm , 25-secs , 1600 ISO , f/3.5 , tripod mounted .




LOG IN TO REPLY
monk3y
Totally Saturated
monk3y's Avatar
46,189 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Aug 2009
Cloud and Honey
Oct 28, 2010 08:02 |  #30

Celestron wrote in post #11180502external link
Yeah it qualifies monk3y . Thats a couple nice shots especially the MW . I have one i took from Ft.Davis back in August . Turned out similiar . XSI , 18-55mmIS @ 18mm , 25-secs , 1600 ISO , f/3.5 , tripod mounted .

yeah it looks similar, yours look much better though :D


www.monk3y.comexternal link | My GEAR

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

554,414 views & 467 likes for this thread
You don't need a telescope
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00105 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.05s
Latest registered member is Ginn
920 guests, 450 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016