Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial
Thread started 27 Oct 2010 (Wednesday) 15:45
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

You don't need a telescope

 
Sorarse
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Sorarse's Avatar
2,193 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Kent, UK
Oct 28, 2010 08:42 |  #31

The aim of the thread was to try and encourage people to have a go at shooting the night sky, even if they don't own a telescope.

I'm not going to ban shots that were taken through a standard camera lens, even if the camera was piggy-backed on a scope, but I would ask posters of any such images to mention that they were taken with the aid of a tracking mount, so as not to give false hope/expectations to people without such kit.

p.s. I'm surprised we haven't had any star trail images yet.


At the beginning of time there was absolutely nothing. And then it exploded! Terry Pratchett

http://www.scarecrowim​ages.comexternal link
Canon PowerShot G2

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
luigis
Goldmember
luigis's Avatar
1,399 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Oct 28, 2010 08:49 |  #32

Another one:

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4126/4999906554_cae999cc40_z.jpg

Nikon 14-24 F2.8 on 5dII, 10 stacked shots each 1 minute.

www.luisargerich.comexternal link
Landscape Photography & Astrophotography
Follow me on Twitterexternal link
My Awesome Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
C.Michael
Senior Member
C.Michael's Avatar
754 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Adelaide, South Australia
Oct 28, 2010 08:54 |  #33

Sorarse wrote in post #11180719 (external link)
The aim of the thread was to try and encourage people to have a go at shooting the night sky, even if they don't own a telescope.

I'm not going to ban shots that were taken through a standard camera lens, even if the camera was piggy-backed on a scope, but I would ask posters of any such images to mention that they were taken with the aid of a tracking mount, so as not to give false hope/expectations to people without such kit.

p.s. I'm surprised we haven't had any star trail images yet.

don't speak too soon. I know they are crappy though, they are my first two attempts.

;)


Canon550D + Tamron 17-50 nonVC 2.8 @ 17mm

40 stack over 30 mins

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4131/5098678379_44c2a68248_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com ...pher__michael/50986​78379/] (external link)
star trails. (external link) by christopher__michael (external link), on Flickr

Canon550D + Tamron 17-50 nonVC 2.8 @ 17mm
120 stack over 40 hour
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4043/5122804819_528e24f396_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com ...pher__michael/51228​04819/] (external link)
star trails attempt two (external link) by christopher__michael (external link), on Flickr

www.christophermorriso​n.com.auexternal link
Canon 5D Classic w/ grip | 50mm f/1.8 | 85 f/1.8 | 430EX II + YN460II

LOG IN TO REPLY
C.Michael
Senior Member
C.Michael's Avatar
754 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Adelaide, South Australia
Oct 28, 2010 08:55 |  #34

luigis wrote in post #11180763 (external link)
Another one:

QUOTED IMAGE

Nikon 14-24 F2.8 on 5dII, 10 stacked shots each 1 minute.

how do you have no star movement with exposures of 1 minutes?

Amazing photo!


www.christophermorriso​n.com.auexternal link
Canon 5D Classic w/ grip | 50mm f/1.8 | 85 f/1.8 | 430EX II + YN460II

LOG IN TO REPLY
jsigone
Senior Member
416 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Oct 28, 2010 08:57 |  #35

real nice image luigis!!! I wish my sky is as dark as yours.


Here's one of mine with Canon 85mm F1.8 on 1000D (XS)
8x150sec @ F2.8

IMAGE: http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e359/jsigone/Astro/ngc7000wide85mmFinal.jpg

My Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mtbdudex
Goldmember
mtbdudex's Avatar
Joined Nov 2009
SE Michigan
Oct 28, 2010 09:52 |  #36

Sorarse wrote in post #11180719external link
The aim of the thread was to try and encourage people to have a go at shooting the night sky, even if they don't own a telescope.

100% agree, I don't own a 'scope (yet), and have been documenting my endeavors in this thread Top 10 in 2010 to shoot (Astronomy, non telescope)

I'll post some of those "neat" captures into this thread, with lessons learned as sharing.

Frankly, I knew NOTHING 10 months ago and with lots of peoples help in this forum my knowledge of the night sky has increased, along with the re-awakening of my "awe" of our place in the universe. Something I had as a child, "lost" as an adult over the years, and now have re-gained it.


Mike R, P.E. ...iMac 27"(i7), iPad2, iPhone5s, 24" iMac, AppleTV(160), MacBook
Canon: 70D, T1i + lens:70-200 L f2.8 IS II / TC 1.4x 2x / 15-85 / f1.4 50 / UWA 11-16 Tokina
FEISOL tripod CT-3441S + CB-40D Ball Head, iOptron EQ tracker
My top 10 in Astrophotography. . .DIY acoustic panels (external link) . . APOD Aug-5-2011 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
ichigosa
Member
142 posts
Joined Feb 2010
south africa
Oct 28, 2010 10:34 |  #37

C.Michael wrote in post #11180787external link
how do you have no star movement with exposures of 1 minutes?

Amazing photo!

the stars dont really move much in 1 min. the effect is just emphasized at longer focal legnths.. I'm sure that shot at 100% would show a the movement.

By the way, are photos stacked with DSS allowed?


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/imaginethesky/external link
www.imaginethesky.comexternal link - my blog
Equipment: Canon EOS 30D, 17 - 85mm USM, 50mm f1.8, 70 - 300 IS USM, 430 EX Speedlight

LOG IN TO REPLY
luigis
Goldmember
luigis's Avatar
1,399 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Oct 28, 2010 10:41 |  #38

ichigosa wrote in post #11181299external link
the stars dont really move much in 1 min. the effect is just emphasized at longer focal legnths.. I'm sure that shot at 100% would show a the movement.

By the way, are photos stacked with DSS allowed?

The stars don't move because I was using the Astrotrac mount, it really works, it holds at 100% without any problem.At 1 minute even at 14mm the corners would show trails.


www.luisargerich.comexternal link
Landscape Photography & Astrophotography
Follow me on Twitterexternal link
My Awesome Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,397 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jun 2007
Texas USA
Oct 28, 2010 10:43 |  #39

luigis wrote in post #11180763 (external link)
Another one:

QUOTED IMAGE

Nikon 14-24 F2.8 on 5dII, 10 stacked shots each 1 minute.

Luigis , this is a fantastic shot !! That lens seems to produce some great images . This is one shot you should increase in size and wall hang it and also you should send this to http://antwrp.gsfc.nas​a.gov/apod/astropix.ht​ml (external link)

a shot like this with the MW and the SMC and LMC is worthy of posting !




LOG IN TO REPLY
archer1960
Goldmember
archer1960's Avatar
Joined Jul 2010
Oct 28, 2010 10:56 |  #40

C.Michael wrote in post #11180787external link
how do you have no star movement with exposures of 1 minutes?

Amazing photo!

14 - 24mm focal length, that's how. No exif to see what the fl used for this shot was, though.


Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.

LOG IN TO REPLY
luigis
Goldmember
luigis's Avatar
1,399 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Oct 28, 2010 10:59 |  #41

Ty Ron, I was lucky to be south enough to get the LMC, SMC and the MW in the same frame.
The Nikon 14-24 is great for night shots I wonder how the Samyang 14mm F2.8 works for similar shots.


www.luisargerich.comexternal link
Landscape Photography & Astrophotography
Follow me on Twitterexternal link
My Awesome Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
ichigosa
Member
142 posts
Joined Feb 2010
south africa
Oct 28, 2010 11:06 |  #42

another moon and venus, but hey.

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4148/5123648768_a2bcae0a9e_z.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/imaginethesky/external link
www.imaginethesky.comexternal link - my blog
Equipment: Canon EOS 30D, 17 - 85mm USM, 50mm f1.8, 70 - 300 IS USM, 430 EX Speedlight

LOG IN TO REPLY
drevilsmom
Goldmember
drevilsmom's Avatar
1,100 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Miami, FL
Oct 28, 2010 11:15 |  #43

I wanna play!

ISS passing over our hay barn

IMAGE: http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s254/drevilsmom/ISS-filtered.jpg

Orion and Sirius startrails over same hay barn.
IMAGE: http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s254/drevilsmom/orionandbarn2.jpg

Me holding the moon.
IMAGE: http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s254/drevilsmom/moon_filtered.jpg

Our farm. And you can definitely tell I'm not using my scope with my camera here, LOL!
IMAGE: http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s254/drevilsmom/nicesky.jpg

Elizabeth

40D and modded 20D| 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | nifty fifty | assortment of pentax lenses with adapter
CG-5GT | AT102ED

LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,397 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jun 2007
Texas USA
Oct 28, 2010 11:28 |  #44

Sorarse wrote in post #11180719external link
The aim of the thread was to try and encourage people to have a go at shooting the night sky, even if they don't own a telescope.

I'm not going to ban shots that were taken through a standard camera lens, even if the camera was piggy-backed on a scope, but I would ask posters of any such images to mention that they were taken with the aid of a tracking mount, so as not to give false hope/expectations to people without such kit.

p.s. I'm surprised we haven't had any star trail images yet.

Thats really a good suggestion and i have really enjoyed images with camera/lens only equip . Like Badger and Luigis have some great images but most of all i wish i had their cameras and lens :D ! Meanwhile i have to stick to a XSi which properly used still produces some great images . Luigis equip cost more than my scope and all the accessories i have for it including my cameras and lens :eek: . But i'm sure he uses it professionally my guess .

I think it's the topic name and some comments made that may have been a little touchy for some here including me . When you interpret it the way you did in this post it sounds very acceptable but someone stated earlier " Yeah Who needs a telescope? " . Sounds like ppl with right camera and lens can do anything that someone with a telescope can do but thats very arguable cause a camera/lens on a tracking device or still tripod is still limited to a point . Same as different scopes and sizes are limited to their use also . Truth is there has really been very little moon images for example posted here that really can meet the qualities of a moon image taken with a telescope as to say just a lens . Can't remember who but someone here has posted a moon image taken with a Big-Ma 150-500.. and a tele added and it produce a fantastic image but my Sig 135-400mm APO only produces a fair image .

The whole purpose of the Astronomy section here at POTN is to make ppl aware of astronomy images also taken with a Canon camera and help ppl understand that cameras are not limited to daytime images or night time images with lots of light pollution around only . However where just a camera/lens is used what makes the big difference is you cannot observe the nightskies looking through a view finder or using live-view . You can't look at a distance galaxie and see any structure or detail . Maybe with a hugh lens that cost an arm and leg you might see the bright center of the Andromeda galaxie slightly or the brightest nebulaes like the Orion neb or the Lagoon M8 but not much detail at all .

Other words you cannot observe DeepSpace without some type of telescope . Just remember that all images that have been produced here since me and a few others like Steve (Nighthound) help get this section started , we have already done all these images in the past that new imagers here are doing now , just some have better equip than what we started with or have now . And i don't think anyone will disagree that this is an exciting section of different images that most ppl enjoy some way or other and thats why i agree with you about posting pictures here without a telescope use . I'd like to see some good night time horizon shots taken just after sunset also . They make great shots as long as they don't look like daytime shots :( . Like this one below and with this i'll quieten down :oops: .




LOG IN TO REPLY
drevilsmom
Goldmember
drevilsmom's Avatar
1,100 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Miami, FL
Oct 28, 2010 11:49 |  #45

Nice shot, Ron!


Elizabeth

40D and modded 20D| 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | nifty fifty | assortment of pentax lenses with adapter
CG-5GT | AT102ED

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

555,295 views & 470 likes for this thread
You don't need a telescope
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00223 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.05s
Latest registered member is kodds
896 guests, 313 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016