![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,469
|
I've personally shot weddings, people, shows, etc. Ranging from $100 to $5000 per session/event.
I use to work an IT job full time, photography part-time. But recently went full-time photography since I was making more part-time compared to my full time job! I was just wondering, which field of photography usually makes photographers the most money? I know it depends a lot on who is taking the pictures, for who it is, etc.. but there should be one that stands out the most. From my experience, I've made the most from shows. your thoughts on this subject? thanks Last edited by MLphoto : 30th of October 2010 (Sat) at 20:48. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
The one that you can deliver the top results in. It's going to be different for different people.
__________________
www.LensArtwork.com www.flickr.com/photos/lensartwork www.MeltedRubber.com My website, Flickr, and blogs |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
|
Here's an arena of photography that is pretty cool. A page showing one 84 image photo stitch they put together
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/re...gatefold-image I'm guessing that this travel and outdoors for broadcast and magazines is a comfortable income niche for photography. Anyone know where the benchmark is to move from rags to riches in that field.
__________________
Canon 5D Mk II | 60D | Canon 24-105 L | 50 1.4 | 135 L | Tamron 17-50 2.8 VC | Tokina 16-28 2.8 | Sigma 85 1.4 for fun Coast Redwoods ... and work Portland Tree Last edited by mdvaden : 30th of October 2010 (Sat) at 23:54. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Retirement
__________________
mark iin; mark iid(S); 7d; G10: Canon 17-40, nifty 50, Canon 24-70L, Canon 10-22, Canon 70-200/2.8 L II, 300 2.8, 400/5.6, L 135, Canon 85/1.8: Canon 100 macro, tubes, Canon 1.4 tele conv. =======>>> play W.A.I.N. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!"
|
According to the book "Best Business Practices for Photographers" the highest paying field within photography is Advertising and Commercial, followed by Stock (not microstock) followed by Corporate and then Architectural.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Stupidest Question Award 2008
|
High-end photographers can make 100-200k a year. (That's what I'm aiming for!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Sadly I bet some Paparazzi are on that list. Not most, but some.
__________________
Taylor Galleries: Flickr Photoshop.com 60D - ELPH 100HS - 15-85 - 30 1.4 - 50-135 2.8 - 55-250 IS |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
A lame title from the TF
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fairport NY
Posts: 957
|
I wonder what Pete Souza the White House Photographer makes...
__________________
1DX, Gripped 60D,10-22mm, 18-135mm, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 24-70L, TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II, 100mm f2.8 Macro, 50mm f/1.4, 60mm 2/2.8 Macro, 580ex, 430EXII, Pocketwizards, Softbox, Tamron 1.4X TC, Canon 2x TC, GT3541LS, BH-55 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 105
|
Stock should no longer be in second. I know many former stock shooters who have quit that side of the business in the last two years because the market has been over saturated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 11,512
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 100
|
The shots of supermodel Kate Moss taking cocaine sold for £150,000 - this is going back a few years. I know the going rate for the first pictures of Brad and Angelina's baby was rumoured to be $1m.
Like most fields though the paparazzi market has been saturated. I was speaking to a guy who co-runs an agency and he said his rates have dropped by 50% in the last year. Top end commercial and advertising guys still make six figure salaries. But you need a lot of experience, talent and an impressive portfolio to even get a sniff at that. I think though money shouldn't be a driving factor for a professional photographer. It's a major one, granted, but your passion is the key to commissions and a long term career. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
IN any field, only the top few make the really big bucks. Photography is likely no different. The top 1% in any segment make a ton, the next 24% make an honest living, and the rest struggle it out.
__________________
Taylor Galleries: Flickr Photoshop.com 60D - ELPH 100HS - 15-85 - 30 1.4 - 50-135 2.8 - 55-250 IS |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
|
Generally speaking its commercial/advertising.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nashvegas
Posts: 965
|
From my experience as a photo assistant commercial, advertising, and celebrity photographers make the most. They tend to take shots that garner higher usage fees, also they tend to have bigger productions which cost more to produce....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,500
|
I think that's true, like you say generally. Back in the day I knew a couple of wedding/portrait photographers who were very wealthy, they had a stable of 10 or more photographers working for them and several portrait studio locations each. It may be a model that isn't viable anymore but it sure worked for them.
__________________
"Try to go out empty and let your images fill you up." Jay Maisel |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| This forum makes me spend money! Which one? | Kai | Weddings and Other Family Events | 16 | 13th of August 2007 (Mon) 15:42 |
| Poll on what makes a good photog. Luck, Money or Skill | arkturas | The POTN Lounge | 38 | 31st of December 2006 (Sun) 00:20 |
| anyone who makes money off their photography... | brighterthansunshine | The Business of Photography | 13 | 10th of November 2006 (Fri) 08:32 |
| Money makes the world go around.. | Stav_98 | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 22 | 9th of November 2005 (Wed) 03:02 |
| Money makes the world go a-round... | sunshinewashere | People | 3 | 8th of October 2005 (Sat) 10:14 |