Test: Canon 70-300mm (non-L) vs Tamron 70-300 VC USD -- Canon EF and EF-S Lenses in photography-on-the.net forums

Goldmember

2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

More info

Nov 13, 2010 15:10 | #1

Size:

The Tamron is noticeably bigger, heavier and better built. Zoom wheels and all are tight, no wobbles, front barrel doesn't rotate, etc etc. 62mm vs 58mm thread size on Canon's. Around the same length fully extended, but Tamron's hood is longer. Tamron's slightly heavier (1lb 14.3oz vs 1lb 8.9oz).

IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

5D3 and a few lenses.

LIKES 0

HyperYagami
THREAD STARTER

Goldmember

2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

More info

Nov 13, 2010 15:11 | #2

IQ:

IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

5D3 and a few lenses.

LIKES 0

HyperYagami
THREAD STARTER

Goldmember

2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

More info

Nov 13, 2010 15:17 as a reply to @ HyperYagami's post | #3

IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

100% crops (but at the mercy of flickr, might be not anymore).

This is done via mounting the camera on a tripod. Since the Tamron is slightly heavier the framings are not 100% exact. For this test, the exposure are kept constant, i.e., stop down 1/3 stop but also increase shutter speed by 1/3 stop. Tamron is dialed in MA of -5 and Canon is pain in the **** to MA via the method here

, so I leave it at 0. The pics are converted via DPP.

Tamron's CA is more obvious than Canon's, even after stopping down to f/8. Stopping down Tamron's does improve it a little bit as many has pointed out. Due to the CA Canon's seems to have better center sharpness than Tamron's. However once we move to the edges Canon just fall apart.

Notice we get better yellow and red from the Tamron.

5D3 and a few lenses.

LIKES 0

HyperYagami
THREAD STARTER

Goldmember

2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

More info

Nov 13, 2010 15:20 as a reply to @ HyperYagami's post | #4

IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

In general Tamron usually meter the same scene slightly brighter than Canon (more on that later). Combined that with CA, Canon usually looks sharper in the middle (but really not that noticeable until you pixel-peeping).

Notice Tamron usually have better colors and contrast (more on that later).

5D3 and a few lenses.

LIKES 0

HyperYagami
THREAD STARTER

Goldmember

2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

More info

Nov 13, 2010 15:30 as a reply to @ HyperYagami's post | #5

IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

The outdoor shots are done in Av mode, handheld with IS/VC on.

In terms of details they're really about the same, probably due to contrast if any. Bokeh-wise, they're about the same too, with the Canon looks tiny bit slightly busier but my pics are not scientific enough to draw real conclusions.

In terms of color and constast, I really think the Tamron wins. My biggest complain about Canon's has been its dull colors all along, and the tree scene shows we have deeper orange with Tamron than Canon's (on top of totally bury edges with the Canon).

As mentioned, the Tamron consistently chooses lower shutter speed than Canon under Av mode. My theory is, since we have better contrast (deeper black) on the Tamron the camera chooses lower shutter speed for it (which unfortunately makes the CA more obvious). The "top of can" test shows once we meter it at a bright spot, it chooses higher shutter speed than Canon's (because I think it has brighter brights too).

5D3 and a few lenses.

LIKES 0

HyperYagami
THREAD STARTER

Goldmember

2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

More info

Nov 13, 2010 15:42 as a reply to @ HyperYagami's post | #6

IS/VC:

Tamron's is godlike, it really literal freezes the scene. Canon's not bad, but Tamron's better. However sometimes you feel like you have to fight with it to get it out of the little spot you're trying to focus on, so it's really not for really really tiny objects.

Conclusion: I believe the Tamron gives you a better rendered picture. If you don't mind dealing with the CA at the post (Lightroom currently does not have the lens profile for this yet) it does give you better looking pictures.

5D3 and a few lenses.

LIKES 0

HyperYagami
THREAD STARTER

Goldmember

2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

More info

Nov 13, 2010 15:51 as a reply to @ HyperYagami's post | #7

Flickr sucks, so feel free to grab the ZIP file:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=4W9XZBFJ

5D3 and a few lenses.

LIKES 0

wombatHorror

Goldmember

1,937 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: NJ

More info

Nov 13, 2010 16:03 | #8

HyperYagami wrote in post #11278283

the center CA aberration from the tamron is longitudinal though which is a beast to correct though

were those all at 300mm?

i found the 70-300 IS to have good color and contrast on the wide side and then poor contrat and color at 300mm.

LIKES 0

HyperYagami
THREAD STARTER

Goldmember

2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

More info

Nov 13, 2010 16:07 | #9

wombatHorror wrote in post #11278395

were those all at 300mm?

shoe, can on wood pole, and 12 cans pics aren't, the rest are 300mm.

Oh OK, well to me I'll trade a little CA for better colors.

5D3 and a few lenses.

LIKES 0

arctic-char

Member

115 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Australia, not that thing north of Ethiopia

More info

Nov 13, 2010 16:35 | #10

Thanks for posting HyperYagami. I have the 70-300 IS and am looking for something that will perform better at the long end. From your comparison I don't see enough of an improvement (if any) to warrant changing to the Tamron. I may have to look at the new 70-300 L or even 100-400. Will wait for some reviews of the new 70-300L.

LIKES 0

HyperYagami
THREAD STARTER

Goldmember

2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

More info

Nov 13, 2010 16:43 | #11

arctic-char wrote in post #11278523

To me the biggest improvements are edge details and better colors. I'm sure the L version is even better but it's more $$$ and lot bigger too.

Everyone feel me to hit me with more questions.

5D3 and a few lenses.

LIKES 0

PNPhotography

Senior Member

769 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 40
Joined Sep 2007
Location: central PA

More info

Nov 13, 2010 17:16 | #12

Nice test!! What's the price on these two lenses?
Paul

6D|7D|7DMKII|Nikon D750|Nikon 85 F1.8|Nikon D5500|G15| Gripped|300F4|35F2IS|85 F1.8|135L F2|200L F2.8|17-55 F2.8|70-200L F2.8 MKII|430EX|
https://www.facebook.com …2755174446/?ref=bookmarks

LIKES 0

HyperYagami
THREAD STARTER

Goldmember

2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

More info

Nov 13, 2010 17:31 | #13

canon rookie wrote in post #11278670

Nice test!! What's the price on these two lenses?
Paul

right now the tamron has $50 rebate with base price $450.

you can get a used 70-300 canon for around that price or a little less, new is $520-ish.

5D3 and a few lenses.

LIKES 0

Staiden

Member

36 posts
Joined Nov 2010

More info

Nov 13, 2010 21:03 | #14

I just bought the canon version of this lens. Its the first lens I have ever bought. I'm pretty happy with it. Thank you for the compareison of these lenses.

Canon Rebel XS.
My online gallery: http://www.deetzphotography.net

LIKES 0

HyperYagami
THREAD STARTER

Goldmember

2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

More info

Nov 13, 2010 21:35 | #15

Staiden wrote in post #11279608

I just bought the canon version of this lens. Its the first lens I have ever bought. I'm pretty happy with it. Thank you for the compareison of these lenses.

Canon's by no mean bad. In fact I believe it does a slightly better job focusing in low light than the Tamron's (by a hair).

5D3 and a few lenses.

LIKES 0

AAA

	x 1600
	y 1600

Jump to forum... • Rules • Index • New posts • RTAT • 'Best of' • Gallery • Gear • Reviews • Member list • Polls • Image rules • Search • Password reset

Not a member yet?

Register to forums

Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

THEME: Paper White | Darker
MARGINS: (this page: defaults)

Latest registered member is Nidge
613 guests, 414 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.