LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


VolleyBall Blues

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner
Thread started 02 Oct 2001 (Tuesday) 19:28   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
mpkirby
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2001
118 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Beach512 wrote:

> Nice shot! I love how you captured that moment and the expression on your sons'
> face is great! We all can relate to that. It is nice to see a "real life" moment shot.
> We can only shoot so many pictures of flowers, fire hydrants, dragonflies, buildings
> at night, etc. before we all cry ENOUGH!! Thanks for sharing this! Hope to see
> more soon.
>
> Dave


I suppose then I am obligated to provide the following image:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.fototime.co​m/93773196495884C/stan​dard.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FOTOTIME


This was at my company picnic. The individual in question had just gotten smashed in the face with a volley ball. I was shooting in continuous shoot mode, and following the ball. Sometimes you get lucky.

Some criticism (easy with this one).

1) Too much motion blur. I should have made it a faster shutter speed (1/200 or higher)

2) Over-exposed on the face. Learn that under-exposed action shots can be recovered in photoshop, but overexposed are toast.

3) I shouldn't have been facing the sun (the original had a "haze" to it...I exposure balanced in qimage). Of course, had I not been facing the sun, I wouldn't have gotten the shot.

Mike

Post #1, Oct 02, 2001 19:28:40




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
philgabe
Member
Joined Sep 2001
95 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Mike:

I don't know if it's my computer screen or the resolution on my laptop, but the volleyball picture seems way oversharpened to me. I was wondering if you tried to save some of the motion blur with additional sharpening? If that's the case I would have left the background unsharpened (or more modestly sharpened) and done additional selective sharpening on the faces.

To help over-exposed areas, you could try the following technique (it may not work if the areas are so over-exposed that no information is recorded), but it may work....

1. select the overexposed areas (feather a bit)
2. copy
3. past as new layer
4. use "multiply" mode and play with the opacity.
5. if necessary redo all these steps a second time

To bring back details in areas that are underexposed do same but use the "screen" mode instead of the "multiply".

Otherwise, cool stuff!

Philippe

Post #2, Oct 03, 2001 14:23:30




LOG IN TO REPLY
mpkirby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2001
118 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

You are right. I did apply a sharpening filter to it. Given the background, I probably should have applied it to just the foreground. I'll try excluding the tree from the sharpening filter.

Look for an update in a day or so.

Mike

Post #3, Oct 04, 2001 05:32:24




LOG IN TO REPLY
mpkirby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2001
118 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Here is the updated volleyball picture. I don't think it made a huge difference. Perhaps its the jpeg artifacts (because I was shooting in continuous, I used jpeg, not raw.

It also could be the down-sizing for the monitor. I didn't use any fancy resolution conversion.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.fototime.co​m/8C1D2CE9851B809/stan​dard.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FOTOTIME


Mike

Post #4, Oct 06, 2001 14:59:47




LOG IN TO REPLY
philgabe
Member
Joined Sep 2001
95 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Hey Mike, I really cannot tell the difference either, but then I'm using a rather poor screen (my office laptop IBM 240). This screen just sucks totally to view pictures.

Philippe

Post #5, Oct 11, 2001 12:51:23




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
mpkirby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2001
118 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Hmm. Perhaps on the original it would be easier to tell. In the second one, there was no sharpening on the tree. I use a low sharpening setting in the camera as well.

Mike

Post #6, Oct 12, 2001 05:58:02




LOG IN TO REPLY
gerry
Senior Member
Joined Nov 2001
131 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

nice capture, but i would have cropped a lot tighter

left out those distracting company men in the background.

this picture pleads, crop me!

Post #7, Jan 23, 2002 18:47:40




LOG IN TO REPLY
Leighow
Goldmember
Joined Jan 2002
2,844 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

MIKE

My reaction to the first picture was -- not knowing that you had sharpened -- the weird look of the foreground tree.

I had noticed the same condition on a leafless maple tree that I was viewing at about 15% size. That tree's thin branches looked all broken-up -- as if the sky had moved on the light spots. In fact I thought that the camera had a problem.

But zoom in, and (to my relief) every single branch and branchlet was captured in continuous detail.

I bet that on the 3 ft x 2 ft blow-up, the leaves on the foreground trees are in great shape.

Interesting! Very interesting!!

HOWIE

Post #8, Jan 23, 2002 21:00:23




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,715 views & 0 likes for this thread
VolleyBall Blues
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00099 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
787 guests, 591 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Old Father William

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.