Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography
Thread started 19 Nov 2010 (Friday) 12:20
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

How can I cost effectively ship large framed prints to buyers?

 
camdencooper
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Nov 19, 2010 12:20 |  #1

I'd like to sell my framed/matted prints on eBay this holiday season but I can't figure out how to ship the prints to buyers without it costing a fortune in shipping fees. Most of my photos are either 16x20" or 11x14" and when I've shipped these in the past it usually has cost between $35.00 and $60.00 using standard shipping methods through UPS. I've checked with FedEx and USPS and their prices have been more or less the same.

What I can't understand is how other sellers are able to charge so much less for shipping and still make a profit; I've looked through other eBay auctions for similarly sized framed prints and the majority of them charge a flat rate of only $9.99 or around that price. If I could fit my prints into the flat rate boxes offered by UPS/FedEx then I could lower the shipping cost dramatically, but none of them are the right dimensions to hold my prints. Instead, in order to ship them I'll have to look through my attic for a spare box big enough to put the framed print in and then an even larger box to put that box inside (with layers of bubble wrap between) so that the glass doesn't break during the shipment and the *minimum* cost of sending the package usually ends up being about 40 or 50 dollars (more if the buyer is further away geographically).

I can't expect people to purchase my prints if I'm charging $30 - 60 more in shipping than other sellers and I can't add the shipping cost into my purchase price and offer "free shipping" either since that would raise my item's prices up significantly higher than those of other sellers as well. So what's the secret here? How can I sell and ship my framed photos at a reasonable price and still make a profit?




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
cdifoto's Avatar
34,039 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Nov 19, 2010 13:53 |  #2

Have you considered selling them without frames? You could then roll them. I thnk those folks who are charging $10 to ship their framed prints either build the loss into their sale price or simply aren't actually shipping any...ie they haven't sold any so they have no idea how much of a loss they'd be taking.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it hereexternal link. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Cream of the Crop
RDKirk's Avatar
11,881 posts
Joined May 2004
USA
Nov 19, 2010 15:59 as a reply to cdifoto's post |  #3

Shipping prints that size be cheaper, but be sure that your overboxing isn't inching past the point that the total size (length+width+girth, or however they're doing it) trips the cost substantially higher. Those sellers either use acrylic (eliminating double boxing and saving both weight and packaging) or the package the glass separately from the frame (which eliminates the need for double-boxing).




LOG IN TO REPLY
GJim
Goldmember
GJim's Avatar
1,198 posts
Joined Apr 2010
On the road, Again!
Nov 19, 2010 18:51 |  #4

Imagekind.com shows the following US shipping costs for a 18x24 matted/framed print:

~~~
Prints and Framed Artwork
FedEx is our preferred carrier for prints. Choose a shipping method from the following:

Ground Domestic
3-5 Business Days
$13.99
2nd Day Domestic
$17.99
Next Day Domestic
$39.99
~~~

Of course, that means that you have to sell the prints through their web-site, and you may/may-not be satisfied with their matting/framing.


G'Jim c):{- ... 50D (Gripped), 7D (Gripped), assorted glass, sundry accouterments.
The beginner clicks the shutter and says "Let's see what I got." ... The experienced photographer thinks "How can I capture what I see?"
My Photography and my Blog: http://www.gjim.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Moderator
PhotosGuy's Avatar
72,106 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Joined Feb 2004
Middle of Michigan
Nov 21, 2010 10:13 |  #5

Since you used a descriptive title, the forum has done a mini-search for you. Look at the links at the very bottom left hand corner of this page.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1280 pixels on any side.

LOG IN TO REPLY
mikekelley
"Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!"
mikekelley's Avatar
7,317 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Los Angeles, CA
Nov 21, 2010 13:50 |  #6

Can you drop ship? I know MPIX and others will drop ship for considerably less than what I could get away with.


Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photographyexternal link
How To Photograph Real Estate and Architecture
My Fine Art Galleries
My articles at Fstoppers.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
8,728 posts
Joined Apr 2006
North Carolina
Nov 22, 2010 06:51 |  #7

camdencooper wrote in post #11312934external link
I'd like to sell my framed/matted prints on eBay this holiday season but I can't figure out how to ship the prints to buyers without it costing a fortune in shipping fees.

In answer to your original question, you can't - at least in my experience. That's why I stopped offering framed/matted prints on the website.

When the quantity of pieces is high enough, I personally deliver F/M'ed pieces anywhere in my state*, but for the distant single-print purchaser, I no longer offer it. Shipping costs are high, and dangers horrendous if you frame with glass. And when you add the cost of shipping a F/M print to your price, it makes it appear too high. Not to mention the time spend packing, etc. is a PITA.

Many of those shipping at lower prices have negotiated contract deals. Adorama is a good example. When I get a 24x36 printed by them, they ship to me (tube) for $4.95. When I take that exact same tube, re-address it and ship to the customer, I can get it no lower than about $12 (UPS) or $15 (USPS), and even higher depending upon the zone.

What I now do is ship prints in tubes as suggested, but in addition, I include a hints/tips sheet on matting and framing that helps the purchaser get it done at a good price.

(* - It's excellent PR, too ;) )


Website (external link) |

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

19,471 views & 0 likes for this thread
How can I cost effectively ship large framed prints to buyers?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00082 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is Chelshutson
951 guests, 678 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016