Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 27 Nov 2010 (Saturday) 16:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

60D High ISO Performance!

 
conradcjc
Member
33 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2010
Location: New Jersey
     
Nov 27, 2010 16:42 |  #1

I am looking into buying the 60D. I keep going back and forth between 60D and 7D. I realize the 7D is a better camera. How much better is it really? I don't really need the 19 AF points even though that is a nice option. I am not too concerned about the 100% viewfinder even though that isn't bad either. I was wondering how the image quality compares to this camera at normal ISO and high ISO. It is a lot cheaper then the 7D and the savings could be used towards L-Glass. I have been doing a lot of reading and most people say it's the lens that makes the camera. What do you think?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
hieu1004
Goldmember
Avatar
3,579 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Seattle
     
Nov 27, 2010 16:44 |  #2

Pure IQ and low light shots are similar. If you don't need the FPS, better AF, MA - then get the 60D and put the savings into a nice lens.


-Hieu
Gear | Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yourdoinitwrong
Goldmember
Avatar
2,394 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Indiana
     
Nov 27, 2010 16:55 as a reply to  @ hieu1004's post |  #3

For all intents and purposes the 60D and 7D share the same sensor. The only difference I have been able to find anywhere is that the 7D has twice as many output channels. This would have no effect on IQ. So to me it looks like the 60D would be the better choice for you since a lot of the features that make the 7D cost more are not things that are important to you. The 60D should perform the same at high ISO as the 7D.


5D4 w/BG-E20, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 35 f/1.4L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L IS Macro, Sigma 50 f/1.4
Full List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
conradcjc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
33 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2010
Location: New Jersey
     
Nov 27, 2010 17:08 |  #4

What you say makes sense to me. I just wanted to hear it from others. I stopped out at Best Buy earlier today and handled the 60D. The camera feels great for not having a metal body. I think it is damn solid.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yourdoinitwrong
Goldmember
Avatar
2,394 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Indiana
     
Nov 27, 2010 17:19 |  #5

conradcjc wrote in post #11354951 (external link)
What you say makes sense to me. I just wanted to hear it from others. I stopped out at Best Buy earlier today and handled the 60D. The camera feels great for not having a metal body. I think it is damn solid.

I saw one the other day at Best Buy for the first time as well and I would have to say that I was pretty surprised. It feels much better in hand than the spec sheet would imply and all of the worries about it having a "plastic" body I think were blown way out of proportion. Of course that will happen with speculation before anyone actually uses one. The 60D felt very solid and there were no squeaks, creaks, or rattles on a body that I'm sure had been handled by many people. I think it's a camera that should serve you very well.


5D4 w/BG-E20, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 35 f/1.4L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L IS Macro, Sigma 50 f/1.4
Full List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kcbrown
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Nov 27, 2010 18:02 |  #6

The 60D should be a slightly better low-ISO camera than the 7D as well (in terms of image quality), since the 7D has a problem with unbalanced green channels (quite possibly because it has dual read channels in the sensor). That imbalance causes vertical banding in the deep shadows, which means you can't recover details in the shadows as well with the 7D as you presumably can with the 60D.

The T2i doesn't have that problem, which is why I presume the 60D doesn't, either.

It's a subtle thing that you probably won't notice, and ACR 6.1 generally does a reasonably nice job of dealing with it (it's still visible but it's not nearly as objectionable there as it had been), but it may be something else to consider, particularly if you like to make use of the full dynamic range of the camera.


"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aero.nz
Member
Avatar
213 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Nov 27, 2010 18:25 |  #7

I've been very impressed with the high iso performance of my 60D.

iso1600 is very usable, and 3200 to get the shot is still ok! Coming from a 400D were iso400 was a stretch its a real luxury.


6D| EF 17-40mm F4L USM | EF 24-105mm F4L IS USM | 430 ex | Manfrotto 190Pro+804 head
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lannes
Goldmember
Avatar
4,370 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Nov 27, 2010 18:48 |  #8

aero.nz wrote in post #11355293 (external link)
I've been very impressed with the high iso performance of my 60D.

iso1600 is very usable, and 3200 to get the shot is still ok! Coming from a 400D were iso400 was a stretch its a real luxury.

Try using the noise reduction on Ligthroom 3.2, you be surprised how well the iso 3200 shots clean up.


1Dx, 1DM4, 5DM2, 7D, EOS-M, 8-15L, 17-40L, 24 TSE II, 24-105L, 50L, 85L II, 100L, 135L, 200L f/2.8, 300L f/4, 70-200L II, 70-300L, 400Lf/5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Combatmedic870
Goldmember
Avatar
1,739 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Salem ,OR
     
Nov 27, 2010 20:40 |  #9

lannes wrote in post #11355367 (external link)
Try using the noise reduction on Ligthroom 3.2, you be surprised how well the iso 3200 shots clean up.

You will be surprised by how much a ISO6400 shot cleans up! 6400 was usable when i had my 7D. No reason why it wouldnt be on the 60D...If what someone said ^^^ is true about the banding, ISO6400 should be even more usable and even better to process. Ive printed 8x10's using ISO6400...they looked great, with plenty of detail. The truth is in the prints...not viewing at 100% on a monitor(not saying that you do/anyone does).


Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
Olympus XZ-1
,Ryan
Sometimes, I think Photography is worse than Crack.:oops:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RobDickinson
Goldmember
3,976 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 992
Joined Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
     
Nov 27, 2010 20:46 |  #10

This is a 7D ISO 3200 shot no noise reduction:

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i27.photobucket​.com …robdickinson/me​rlin-2.jpg (external link)


Now it looks a bit ropey at 100% but who prints at 100% and ISO 3200 with no NR?

Also an ISo 6400 shot, topaz nr:
PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i27.photobucket​.com …bdickinson/IMG_​0597-1.jpg (external link)


I dont think this would print out great over A4, probably make a great 7x5 ot 10x8 print.

www.HeroWorkshops.com (external link) - www.rjd.co.nz (external link) - www.zarphag.com (external link)
Gear: A7r, 6D, Irix 15mmf2.4 , canon 16-35f4L, Canon 24mm TS-E f3.5 mk2, Sigma 50mm art, 70-200f2.8L, 400L. Lee filters, iOptron IPano, Emotimo TB3, Markins, Feisol, Novoflex, Sirui. etc.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Sheehy
Goldmember
2,290 posts
Likes: 244
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 27, 2010 20:59 |  #11

kcbrown wrote in post #11355202 (external link)
The 60D should be a slightly better low-ISO camera than the 7D as well (in terms of image quality), since the 7D has a problem with unbalanced green channels (quite possibly because it has dual read channels in the sensor). That imbalance causes vertical banding in the deep shadows, which means you can't recover details in the shadows as well with the 7D as you presumably can with the 60D.

The vertical banding in the shadows is independent of the color sensitivity differences in the two green channels and the gain differences of odd and even lines. These are 3 distinct issues in the 7D.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Combatmedic870
Goldmember
Avatar
1,739 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Salem ,OR
     
Nov 28, 2010 01:33 |  #12

John Sheehy wrote in post #11355869 (external link)
The vertical banding in the shadows is independent of the color sensitivity differences in the two green channels and the gain differences of odd and even lines. These are 3 distinct issues in the 7D.

I agree I hated the banding in the 7D. Couldnt push them files at high ISO at all really.


Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
Olympus XZ-1
,Ryan
Sometimes, I think Photography is worse than Crack.:oops:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
themadman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
18,871 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Northern California
     
Nov 28, 2010 01:40 |  #13

If you have no need for crazy af performance, flash commander, MA, and the other wealth of features the 7D has over the 60D, then I am sure the 60D is for you!


Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.​com (external link) | Gear List and Feedback | CPS Member | Have you Pre-Ordered Your 3Dx Yet? | HorusBennu Discussion | In honor of Uncle Steve, thanks for everything! 10-5-2011

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Spacemunkie
Goldmember
Avatar
1,530 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 119
Joined Apr 2008
     
Nov 28, 2010 01:48 |  #14

The 60D has the flash commander doo-hickey as well.

If I was buying again now that the 60D is available I wouldn't buy the 7D knowing what I do now about both cameras...


Scott/Spacemunkie:My photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
themadman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
18,871 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Northern California
     
Nov 28, 2010 01:58 |  #15

Spacemunkie wrote in post #11356777 (external link)
The 60D has the flash commander doo-hickey as well.

If I was buying again now that the 60D is available I wouldn't buy the 7D knowing what I do now about both cameras...

7D FTW! =P

The EOS 60D features a built-in Speedlite transmitter allowing the camera to trigger other compatible Speedlite flash units. However, the 60D cannot control other EX flash units through its pop-up flash. This feature helps when line-of-sight is not available.


Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.​com (external link) | Gear List and Feedback | CPS Member | Have you Pre-Ordered Your 3Dx Yet? | HorusBennu Discussion | In honor of Uncle Steve, thanks for everything! 10-5-2011

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

8,516 views & 0 likes for this thread
60D High ISO Performance!
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is DouglasAZ
700 guests, 381 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.