Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 29 Nov 2010 (Monday) 13:50
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Tokina AT-X 16-28mm F2.8

 
thenextguy
Goldmember
thenextguy's Avatar
Joined Feb 2010
Las Vegas, NV
May 13, 2011 18:33 |  #91

Jonathan Taylor wrote in post #12405224external link
haven't shot anything to show the incredible DoF yet, but shot this last night during my friend's indie film production.
(5DII, 16mm @2.8 around ISO6400)

Is that guy on the left out of focus? Or is that what the edges look like?


Steve -- Website (external link) -- Flickr (external link) -- Tumblr (external link) -- Instagram (external link) -- 500px (external link) (New!)
Canon 5Ds R | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 35 F2 IS | 50mm f/1.4 | 70-200L f/2.8 II

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Jonathan ­ Taylor
Senior Member
699 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Sterling, Virginia
May 13, 2011 19:08 |  #92

thenextguy wrote in post #12405248external link
Is that guy on the left out of focus? Or is that what the edges look like?

He's a good chunk out of focus. It was shot at 2.8 and focused on the guy in the window. The edges on this lens are nice and sharp, when in focus. Beats my experiences with the 16-35L by a longshot.


5DII, 7D, 20-35 2.8L, 35L, 40 Pancake, 50 1.4, 85 1.8, 135 2.0L, 300 f/4L IS, 580EXII, Alien Bees, Bags & Bags & More Bags.
A man is drowning. You can save him, or photograph him. Which lens do you use?
www.Jonathan-Taylor-Photography.comexternal link- www.Facebook.com/Jonat​hanTaylorPhotography -external linkwww.ModelMayhem.com/Jo​nathanTaylorexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mookalafalas
Goldmember
Mookalafalas's Avatar
4,906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jul 2010
Southern Taiwan
May 13, 2011 20:42 |  #93

Or could he have moved some? Must have been fairly slow shutter speed...


Call me Al Gear Flickrexternal link
You don’t have to have a great lens to take great pictures—but it sure helps. –Ben Long

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jonathan ­ Taylor
Senior Member
699 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Sterling, Virginia
May 13, 2011 20:53 |  #94

Mookalafalas wrote in post #12405708external link
Or could he have moved some? Must have been fairly slow shutter speed...

1/125th


5DII, 7D, 20-35 2.8L, 35L, 40 Pancake, 50 1.4, 85 1.8, 135 2.0L, 300 f/4L IS, 580EXII, Alien Bees, Bags & Bags & More Bags.
A man is drowning. You can save him, or photograph him. Which lens do you use?
www.Jonathan-Taylor-Photography.comexternal link- www.Facebook.com/Jonat​hanTaylorPhotography -external linkwww.ModelMayhem.com/Jo​nathanTaylorexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Marloon
Goldmember
4,323 posts
Joined May 2008
Vancouver, BC.
May 13, 2011 23:26 |  #95

I wish that tokina did a better job with this lens. They did a phenomenal job with the 11-16, why could they do the same for this lens! Sigh...


I'm MARLON

Former Canon Platinum CPS member

5DII • 24L • 35L • 50L • 85L • 135L • 200LIS

Wordpress Blogexternal linkYoutube Channelexternal linkTwitterexternal linkGear Listexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mookalafalas
Goldmember
Mookalafalas's Avatar
4,906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jul 2010
Southern Taiwan
May 13, 2011 23:38 |  #96

As far as I can tell, the jury is still out on this one. The photozone review is actually very positive, except for the QC complaints, but then that isn't that unusual for a newer product. I already went the 17-40 route myself, but feel some regret...


Call me Al Gear Flickrexternal link
You don’t have to have a great lens to take great pictures—but it sure helps. –Ben Long

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jonathan ­ Taylor
Senior Member
699 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Sterling, Virginia
May 15, 2011 14:48 |  #97

Mookalafalas wrote in post #12406515 (external link)
I already went the 17-40 route myself, but feel some regret...

You should. This lens (well, my copy at least) is effing PHENOMENAL. Put it to the test yesterday at it's first wedding. It blows my other lenses out of the water for sharpness and saturation wide open. A little hazy around contrasting edges, but no chromatic aberration whatsoever. Unfortunately, photobucket does not do it's true colors justice.

Canon 5D Mark II, Tokina 16-28. ISO 320, 1/640, 28mm f/2.8:

IMAGE: http://i858.photobucket.com/albums/ab142/JonathanTaylorPhoto/IMG_0216editWM.jpg?t=1305488840

5DII, 7D, 20-35 2.8L, 35L, 40 Pancake, 50 1.4, 85 1.8, 135 2.0L, 300 f/4L IS, 580EXII, Alien Bees, Bags & Bags & More Bags.
A man is drowning. You can save him, or photograph him. Which lens do you use?
www.Jonathan-Taylor-Photography.comexternal link- www.Facebook.com/Jonat​hanTaylorPhotography -external linkwww.ModelMayhem.com/Jo​nathanTaylorexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
agphotography
Goldmember
agphotography's Avatar
3,726 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Orange County, CA
May 21, 2011 01:10 |  #98

So do we have an answer yet? If one owns a decent copy of the 16-35L mkI would it be in any way beneficial to trade it in for this Tokina? (say loss of filters wasn't important)


-Abram-
www.goglanianphoto.comexternal link
500pxexternal link / Flickrexternal link
Tumblrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
atlrus
Senior Member
atlrus's Avatar
531 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Michigan
May 22, 2011 20:01 |  #99

I would love to get some fresh info on this lens, too...


Gear: Sold :cry:

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Tee Why's Avatar
10,596 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Pasadena, CA
May 22, 2011 21:58 |  #100

Looks like a second batch came in. Most stores didn't have them in stock till a few days ago and it looks like everyone has it for sale now. Maybe the second batch may have better QC, but seeing from the lack of talk/buzz about this lens, I suspect demand is not that high.

I like the lens but for me, it's a bit too much at $850. I'd personally would go for it at $700 but I may have to wait for the price to drop to that level if it does.

I guess time will tell.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
imposterjeff
Goldmember
1,543 posts
Joined May 2008
odessa tx
May 23, 2011 09:05 |  #101

i think thi may be my next lens i need a wide and whn i had a mid zoom i still went for my 50 all the time so


5Dmkii bge6 x2
Σ 35 ART | Σ 50 ART | Σ 85mm | 135mm f/2L
Leica m6ttl | voigtlander 50mm f/1.5 | pentax 6x7 | 105MM F2.4

LOG IN TO REPLY
Red_Dog
Member
128 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Chesapeake, VA
May 28, 2011 19:52 as a reply to imposterjeff's post |  #102

I finally got to use my 16-28 a LOT today, and I'm VERY happy with the results. I'll post some examples once I get the set processed. Since there was a lot of questions about flaring, I did a couple of shots upward with the sun in the frame to post SOOC.

I will say, while the lens will flare from time to time, it's fairly unobtrusive and only really looks iffy when the lens is backed all the way off to 16mm. The first shot is at 21mm, shot into a midday sun, and I'm quite happy with the flaring:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


At 16mm, however, it builds up strongly in the opposite corner and doesn't look as good. It's cloneable in this example so I'm not that upset, especially since I was deliberately trying to make the lens flare:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Overall, I couldn't be happier with this lens. It did wonderful for me today and I have no regrets about my purchase.

Madman with a D800
5px
external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
dpayne1
Member
48 posts
Joined Nov 2008
San Diego, CA
Jun 11, 2011 08:23 |  #103

I just got the tokina from B&H this week - I have a used (From KEH) 16-35mm II that I have not been thrilled with - could be my copy - I don't know. So, I setup the tripod and took back to back shots with both lenses - cropped to 90%, 16mm, ISO 100, f2.8 and then f4.0 for both. I used manual focus and focused on the infinity symbol of the subject. the canon is first @2.8 then 4.0 followed by the tokina.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://dl.dropbox.com ...1608/Canon16-35LII2.8.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://dl.dropbox.com ...1608/Canon16-35LII4.0.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://dl.dropbox.com .../tokina16-28ATXpro2.8.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://dl.dropbox.com .../tokina16-28ATXpro4.0.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


The tokina isn't perfect (big, heavy) but it's staying and the 16-35 is going. The lens in the picture is better than both the UWA zooms btw.



LOG IN TO REPLY
Red_Dog
Member
128 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Chesapeake, VA
Jun 11, 2011 09:21 |  #104

A few recent examples from mine, these are all processed...

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm6.static.fl​ickr.com ...17290234_af64494b71​_b.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

20110609_1D2_0061 (external link) by reddogphotography (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm3.static.fl​ickr.com ...17289200_062c5ed958​_b.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

20110609_1D2_0051-Edit (external link) by reddogphotography (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm3.static.fl​ickr.com ...16722909_1b16b51cc7​_b.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

20110609_1D2_0027 (external link) by reddogphotography (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm4.static.fl​ickr.com ...17287316_db81d3cd1d​_b.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

20110609_1D2_0012 (external link) by reddogphotography (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm3.static.fl​ickr.com ...17286778_a936065ec9​_b.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

20110609_1D2_0008 (external link) by reddogphotography (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm3.static.fl​ickr.com ...16720217_11362e1bff​_b.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

20110609_1D2_0006 (external link) by reddogphotography (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm4.static.fl​ickr.com ...10802582_c19483f4c0​_b.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

20110514_1D2_0032-Edit (external link) by reddogphotography (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2671/5772585569_6c8b9a7b0b_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com ...s/reddogphoto/57725​85569/] (external link)
20110528_1D2_0485 (external link) by reddogphotography (external link), on Flickr

Madman with a D800
5px
external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
bohdank's Avatar
14,060 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Montreal, Canada
Jun 11, 2011 10:31 |  #105

I'm still tempted to give it another try (my first one was defective) but B&H never seems to have in stock.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographerexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

131,890 views & 6 likes for this thread
Tokina AT-X 16-28mm F2.8
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00108 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.09s
Latest registered member is BPG
776 guests, 499 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016