Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon
Thread started 03 Dec 2010 (Friday) 10:43
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Pictures look better on camera than computer

 
jencol06
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Dec 03, 2010 10:43 |  #1

Hello All! I just purchased a Canon Powershot A3100 IS. When I take a picture and then view it on the camera's LCD screen, it is great- really great. However, when I transfer it to my computer, it looks very grainy and the colors are not as sharp/saturated - they look faded.

I know there are ways to decrease "grainyness" (have already tried lowering ISO), but if my pictures were actually grainy, wouldn't they show up that way on the camera's screen as well?
OR is it common for the picture to look better on the camera than it does on a computer?

Thanks for any help you can give me :)




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
gjl711
I have been itching the new mellow Chet
gjl711's Avatar
49,682 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Deep in the heart of Texas
Dec 03, 2010 10:46 |  #2

Remember, when viewing a picture on the LCD review screen, you are seeing just a fraction of the data in the image and also it is very small so any flaws are well hidden. You can adjust your monitor so that it displays the image properly, but the grain (noise) is in the image and either has to be accepted or post processed out.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
I have been itching the new mellow Chet
gjl711's Avatar
49,682 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Deep in the heart of Texas
Dec 03, 2010 10:46 |  #3

BTW, welcome to the forum


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,627 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Dec 03, 2010 10:49 |  #4

Welcome. And its pretty much as simple as that. The small screen on your camera is lacking in enough detail that everything looks good on it. Also the brightness on small screens can hide a great deal of under or over exposure because the camera screen is dependent on the brightness of the room you are working in.




LOG IN TO REPLY
jencol06
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Dec 03, 2010 10:53 |  #5

Thank you Thank you Thank you!!! I have been researching this question for an hour and could not find the answer.

Now onto researching and trying all the ways to make my photos look better...luckily there are many many posts on that already :)

Thanks again!




LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
I have been itching the new mellow Chet
gjl711's Avatar
49,682 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Deep in the heart of Texas
Dec 03, 2010 11:13 |  #6

For the noise issue, shoot at the lowest ISO you can. The lower the ISO, the less the noise. So it's a balancing act between ISo, the shutter speed and the aperture. Once the picture is taken there are programs, like Noise Ninja, that to an excellent job removing noise from an image.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

LOG IN TO REPLY
jencol06
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Dec 03, 2010 11:18 |  #7

thanks for the tips!




LOG IN TO REPLY
stevewf1
Senior Member
stevewf1's Avatar
688 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Indianapolis
Dec 05, 2010 21:27 |  #8

Reminds me of my slide film days. I'd get a box of Kodachrome slides back and in my eagerness to (finally) see my photos, I'd just hold the slide up to a light. Wow! Looks good! However, when I projected them up to a larger size --- not so good...


Steve

LOG IN TO REPLY
TejasRamakrishnan
Junior Member
26 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Behind a camera!
Mar 13, 2011 06:15 |  #9

Can you show some of the pictures to let us know what the setup where...? If you are getting a lot of grains, then it might need to be taken at lower ISOs, as many guys here told you.
Now, the screen does have this issue as it is of low resolution, a higher resolution images look better in terms of noise suppression... Still, i have not experienced such an evident difference in quality between the LCD and my monitor.....

Try taking the same shots at a lower ISO and check the results....


Camera - Canon PowerShot A3100 IS.
Putting up money and waiting for the release of EOS 600D in India to buy the 550D at a lower price.
Some punks on POTN here, made my interest in the 60D into a decision to get it.... So, 60D, see you soon.

LOG IN TO REPLY
elogical
Goldmember
elogical's Avatar
1,217 posts
Joined Aug 2010
St Paul, Minnesota
Mar 13, 2011 14:25 |  #10

That camera shouldn't be too terrible with the noise unless you're pretty high in the ISO or shooting someplace dark. A lot of times it's good to just accept that some noise ("grain") in the pictures is better than having it blurry from too slow of a shutter speed or having it be too dark from under-exposing. Some of it can be taken out in editing fairly easily as well.


Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
Sal24
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Mar 28, 2011 23:30 |  #11

Funny, I just came to the forum looking for information on the S95 LCD. The pictures have so much punch and color compared to my Dell ST2410 that I was wondering if the small screen was just deceiving me... It almost has me wondering if the S95 LCD is an IPS panel or some better tech than my Dell TN panel LCD. Maybe an overly bright and saturated small screen has the subtle effect of making the pictures look better than we think... because something inside me wants my computer to display pictures with the same bright and colorful look as the S95's little lcd.

Sal




LOG IN TO REPLY
M.Quick
Senior Member
M.Quick's Avatar
441 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Europe
Apr 23, 2011 15:12 |  #12

Size the image on your computer screen down to the size as your s95 LCD and see what a difference it makes... To solve this problem, get a smaller computer screen :D


My "cheap" pro-setup;
Canon EOS 450D | Canon 50mm f1.8 II | Canon EF 70-200L f2.8 IS USM | YN-468 v2
8GB SDHC Class10 | BG-E5 + 4xLP-E5 | RC-4 | Canon E1 | Lowepro Exchange Messenger bag

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

5,031 views & 0 likes for this thread
Pictures look better on camera than computer
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00087 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is nathanferguson
753 guests, 648 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015