Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 11 Dec 2010 (Saturday) 02:17
Prev/next
Poll"which one would you choose"
EF 50 f/1.4 USM
21
21.6%
EF 85 f/1.8 USM
52
53.6%
50mm f/1.4 EX HSM
24
24.7%

97 voters, 97 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

portrait lens?

 
Andy ­ R
Goldmember
Andy R's Avatar
Joined Dec 2008
So Cal
Dec 11, 2010 02:17 |  #1

So im thinking about getting my GF a new lens for portraits, and occasional weddings...she uses my tammy 28-75 but i think a fast prime would be better, now what would be better to have on a xxD body?
i ask because im not much of a portrait photog so i dont know whats concidered to far or just right...

50mm or 85mm?

im looking at the ef50 1.4, sig 50 1.4, and the 85 1.8...

what do you perfer and why?
thanks in advance


5Dii ~ SL1
Rok 14mm ~ 24 STM ~ 24-70L f4 IS ~ 50 f1.8 STM ~ 70-200 f4 IS ~ 1.4xii & 2xii

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
5DamienMkII
Member
180 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Dec 11, 2010 04:44 |  #2

50 f1.4 has excellent bokeh abilities and a good working distance on a crop. As a present you would have to go canon even if the sigma is arguably better... it might look like you went cheap.


5DII 7D
24mm f1.4L 85mm f1.2L 100mm f2.8L 16-35mm f2.8L 24-105 f4 ISL 70-200 f2.8 ISL

LOG IN TO REPLY
E.o.s
Member
E.o.s's Avatar
113 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Dec 11, 2010 05:35 as a reply to 5DamienMkII's post |  #3

Considering the fact you have 1.6 crop body EF 50 1.4 will give 80mm coverage which is nice for potrait on the other hand 85 1.8 on crop will give 136mm coverage which i think too long for indoors and will force you to step back to fill frame so get a 50mm F1.4 its the sharpest prime out there!


1D Mark 4,5D Mark2, 70-200 F 2.8 II L,70-200 F4 IS L 85 F1.2 L 24-70 F2.8 L 50 F1.4 + Talent

LOG IN TO REPLY
jrscls
Goldmember
Joined Mar 2008
Pittsburgh, PA
Dec 11, 2010 07:06 |  #4

Also consider the Canon (or possibly Tamron) 60mm macro.


Fujifilm X-T2, Power Vertical Grip, XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR, XF 23mm f/1.4 R, XF 35mm f/2 R WR, XF 56mm f/1.2 R, XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR, Flashpoint R2 Strobes/Flashes

LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
JeffreyG's Avatar
15,187 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Joined Jan 2007
Detroit, MI
Dec 11, 2010 07:50 |  #5

5DamienMkII wrote in post #11432560external link
50 f1.4 has excellent bokeh abilities

That's about the first time I've ever heard the 50/1.4 described as having good bokeh.

Most people would suggest that the 50/1.4 is one of Canon's worst lenses for bokeh (along with the 24-105L). The 50/1.4 generates strong bright ring highlights and will generate doubling effects with repeating lines.

The lens is still a reasonable choice as a portrait lens on 1.6X...the focal length is about right and the 'bad' bokeh of the 50/1.4 is one of those things that does not show up very often. I used the lens for ~2.5 years and I never had a shot where I though the bokeh was even objectionable let alone ruined the shot.

85mm is considered 'long' by some on 1.6X for portraits, but not by me. I have always liked 135mm on FF for portrait work and so I think the 85/1.8 would be nice on 1.6X.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII

LOG IN TO REPLY
jb1911
Senior Member
jb1911's Avatar
492 posts
Joined May 2010
Chicago area
Dec 11, 2010 09:22 |  #6

The 60mm f2.8 macro is a great lens for portraits. Very sharp.


7D/BG-E7 - 580EXII - EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM - EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM - EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - in a Domke F-2RW
http://www.banpuppymil​ls.com/ (external link)
I like to keep a bottle of liquor handy in case I see a snake, which I also keep handy. ~ W C Fields ~

LOG IN TO REPLY
Chet
For $20, I'll be your friend.
Chet's Avatar
41,689 posts
Gallery: 89 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Dec 11, 2010 09:32 |  #7

On a crop body the 50/1.4 is excellent. If you had full frame I would had recommended the 85. I have been using the 50 for years with excellent results.


Curator of the Bob's Pickle Emporium experience. -As always, One location to serve you better!
~Feel good today and donate to this great forum~ LINK
My Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
Joe ­ Ravenstein
Goldmember
2,338 posts
Joined Mar 2010
E Tx
Dec 11, 2010 09:32 |  #8

Having arrived here after a long time with film cameras. My portrait lens was the 135mm minolta lens the closest equivalent in digital with a crop body is the 85 mm which wonder of all wonders ends up being my favorite lens for portrait use. Not having an 85mm prime as of yet I use the Canon 55-250 for most of my portrature work. Considering getting my 60d with an 85mm lens.


Canon 60D,18-55mm,55-250mm,50mm compact macro, AF ext tubes. Sigma 8-16mm uwa, 18-250mm, 85mm F1.4, 150-500mm

LOG IN TO REPLY
vpnd
Goldmember
vpnd's Avatar
1,483 posts
Joined Oct 2007
nd
Dec 11, 2010 09:53 |  #9

50 macro is usually overlooked for bokeh. the focus is slow, but it's sharp and priced right.


Canon "Snappy".... Thanks Mom and Dad!
"I don't like to play dress up, or pet my gear. I like to shoot stuff and then print it and put it on my wall."

LOG IN TO REPLY
enrigonz
Goldmember
enrigonz's Avatar
1,637 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Miami, FL
Dec 11, 2010 10:02 |  #10

on a crop body, go with the 50 which is a full frame 80mm equivalent, also the Tamy 28-75mm is at my top list for portraits so she already has a great lens for that....


Canon Stuff :) |Flickrexternal link | Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Stuart ­ Leslie
Senior Member
Stuart Leslie's Avatar
611 posts
Joined Sep 2008
New York
Dec 11, 2010 10:58 as a reply to enrigonz's post |  #11

Agree with most others... when I was shooting portraits on my 40D, my 85 was too long in most indoor spaces I use for anything other than face/upper body. Used my 17-55 mostly for those so I would recommend the 50mm length. With my 5D on the other hand, the 85 is a great length and the 70-200 even better!


Gear: Canon 5D III, 5D and 7D | 300 f/2.8L IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 85 f/1.8 | 17-55 f/2.8 [COLOR=navy]| 24-105 f/4L | 10-22 | Zeiss 35 f/2 | TS-E 24II | Alienbees
SmugMug Galleryexternal link
Model Mayhemexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeff81
Goldmember
Jeff81's Avatar
1,689 posts
Joined Dec 2008
SoCal
Dec 11, 2010 11:46 |  #12

JeffreyG wrote in post #11432928external link
That's about the first time I've ever heard the 50/1.4 described as having good bokeh.

Most people would suggest that the 50/1.4 is one of Canon's worst lenses for bokeh (along with the 24-105L). The 50/1.4 generates strong bright ring highlights and will generate doubling effects with repeating lines.

The lens is still a reasonable choice as a portrait lens on 1.6X...the focal length is about right and the 'bad' bokeh of the 50/1.4 is one of those things that does not show up very often. I used the lens for ~2.5 years and I never had a shot where I though the bokeh was even objectionable let alone ruined the shot.

85mm is considered 'long' by some on 1.6X for portraits, but not by me. I have always liked 135mm on FF for portrait work and so I think the 85/1.8 would be nice on 1.6X.

+1. I think that's a great focal length for portraits as well.


6D | Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Sigma 50 f/1.4 Art, Canon 85 f/1.8
flickr (external link)
Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
JelleVerherstraeten
Goldmember
JelleVerherstraeten's Avatar
2,440 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Antwerp, Belgium
Dec 11, 2010 15:43 |  #13

I would say 50mm on crop.


-Jelle l Gear l Website (external link) l

LOG IN TO REPLY
shutterpat
Cream of the Crop
shutterpat's Avatar
10,089 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Joined Sep 2010
Orange, CA.
Dec 11, 2010 15:50 |  #14

Andy R wrote in post #11432321external link
So im thinking about getting my GF a new lens for portraits, and occasional weddings...she uses my tammy 28-75 but i think a fast prime would be better, now what would be better to have on a xxD body?
i ask because im not much of a portrait photog so i dont know whats concidered to far or just right...

50mm or 85mm?

im looking at the ef50 1.4, sig 50 1.4, and the 85 1.8...

what do you perfer and why?
thanks in advance

since you already have the 70-200 (more versatile to use) forget about the 85 instead consider the 50 1.2 if you have the $...anyways, goodluck on your choices.


Follow me --> https://www.instagram.​com/shutterpat/ (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
themadman
Cream of the Crop
themadman's Avatar
18,871 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Northern California
Dec 11, 2010 16:05 |  #15

The Sigma 50 1.4 is an excellent lens, very suitable for portraits on a crop, I would highly recommend this lens.


Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.​comexternal link | Gear List and Feedback | CPS Member | Have you Pre-Ordered Your 3Dx Yet? | HorusBennu Discussion | In honor of Uncle Steve, thanks for everything! 10-5-2011

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

3,340 views & 0 likes for this thread
portrait lens?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00192 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.06s
Latest registered member is jphays
979 guests, 493 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017