Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 09 Sep 2005 (Friday) 09:41
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

To all prospective 5D purchasers

 
Redbird_xo
Senior Member
Redbird_xo's Avatar
542 posts

Joined Jan 2005
MORE INFO

What is your number one reason to consider buying a 5D.

1. Sensor: 35.8 x 23.9mm CMOS sensor with essentially the same pixel density with the 1DMK2.
2. Viewfinder: Pentaprism, 0.71x magnification, 20mm eyepoint, 3 types of interchangeable focusing screens, etc. (Yes, just like the 1-series. True?)
3. Focusing system: 9-point AF (plus 6 invisible Assist AF points).
4. LCD monitor: 2.5" TFT, approx. 230k pixel.
5. Metering modes: The usual plus center spot metering (approx. 3.5% viewfinder at center).
6. ISO speed: 100-1600 (in 1/3-stop increments) plus the 50 and 3200 expansion by custom function.
7. Shutter release: Soft touch electromagnetic release.
8. File format: Folder creation & selection is possible.
9. Others. Please specify.

1. does it for me.

Sep 09, 2005 09:41



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
cosworth's Avatar
10,929 posts

Joined Jul 2005

Duncan, BC, Canada
MORE INFO

Sensor size. Nothing else. A 70-200 length should mean 70-200 etc.

In a couple years we'll have no complaints about sensor size...thus I shy away from EF-S lenses.

Sep 09, 2005 09:45

people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

LOG IN TO REPLY
BillMarks
Senior Member
525 posts
Joined Sep 2005
MORE INFO

1 is the number one reason for me too. But if it didn't have 2, 5 and 6 I probably wouldn't be seriously considering it.

Sep 09, 2005 10:00



LOG IN TO REPLY
RJCONKLIN
Member
105 posts
Joined Oct 2003
MORE INFO

low noise at high iso

Sep 09, 2005 10:15 as a reply to BillMarks's post 15 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Joined Jan 2003

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
MORE INFO

cosworth wrote:
Sensor size. Nothing else. A 70-200 length should mean 70-200 etc.

Hehe, shouldn't that read "A 17-40 lens should mean 17-40 mm"?
Most people don't exactly mind if their 70-200/2.8 'behaves' like a 100-300/2.8 :lol:

Best regards,
Andy

Sep 09, 2005 10:24 as a reply to cosworth's post 39 minutes earlier.

some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

LOG IN TO REPLY
CorruptedPhotographer
Goldmember
CorruptedPhotographer's Avatar
1,799 posts

Joined Jul 2005

AbuDhabi, United Arab Emirates
MORE INFO

cosworth wrote:
Sensor size. Nothing else. A 70-200 length should mean 70-200 etc.

In a couple years we'll have no complaints about sensor size...thus I shy away from EF-S lenses.

you got it baby

Sep 09, 2005 14:50 as a reply to cosworth's post 5 hours earlier.

Gear List
Member since 2005 ^_^

LOG IN TO REPLY
mebailey
Goldmember
1,957 posts
Joined Jul 2005

USA
MORE INFO

Number 1 does it for me. I can finally get my wide angles back.

Sep 09, 2005 14:50 as a reply to Andy_T's post 4 hours earlier.

My Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
ssim's Avatar
10,884 posts

Joined Apr 2003

southern Alberta, Canada
MORE INFO

Basically I am a camera junkie. I probably didn't need to order it but for those occasions where my wide angles just aren't wide enough, this will partially fix it.

Most of the other things on your list I have in my 1DMKII.

Sep 09, 2005 15:29 as a reply to mebailey's post 39 minutes earlier.

My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Galleryexternal link | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

LOG IN TO REPLY
karusel
Goldmember
karusel's Avatar
1,452 posts

Joined Nov 2003

Location: Location:
MORE INFO

While I really like 1. I don't much fancy 3. Also, I'll rather buy the 1.3x 1D MKII when it's price drops a bit more. I'm not that much of a pixel guy, right now 6 million of them are perfectly sufficient, as I don't like cropping my photos much.

Sep 09, 2005 15:36

5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Johnny ­ Thunder
Caution, Cant keep clothes on
Johnny Thunder's Avatar
790 posts

Joined Jun 2005

Temecua, Ca
MORE INFO

#1 for me, with #2 and #6 being Mighty fine as well, and truth be told, #4 is pretty nice.

-Johnny

Sep 09, 2005 15:39

T2i gripped with kit lenshttp://75.126.234.18/f​orum/showthread.php?t=​400860external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
cosworth's Avatar
10,929 posts

Joined Jul 2005

Duncan, BC, Canada
MORE INFO

hmmm. buy a 20D now then sell it at a loss a couple years from now go get full frame... or buy a full frame 5D now, get the extended warranty and shoot with it as long as I did with my AE-1? Will technology just jump leaps an bounds again and again or will camera design/technology plateau for a bit and stabilize like we did from classic 35mm (ae1 MF stuff) to EOS and then EOS to EOS DLSR.

Go buy the camera you like...

Sep 09, 2005 17:12

people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pekka
El General Moderator
Pekka's Avatar
16,409 posts
GALLERY: 26 photos

Joined Mar 2001

Hellsinki, Finland
MORE INFO

I was interested in 5D as a wide angle 2nd camera but it has too compromised a feature set to be truly "captive". And I have realised that for me a 1D series body is a requirement for practical reasons. But as I am sometimes in need of _very_ wide FoV, 5D would be a solution...

PS. If I had the money I would buy all Canons :)

Sep 09, 2005 19:21

The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
AMASS 1.33 Changelog (installed here now)

LOG IN TO REPLY
HrcRacing
Goldmember
HrcRacing's Avatar
2,019 posts

Joined Aug 2005

NE Florida, USA
MORE INFO

Number one makes me want it but number $3,200.00 :shock: makes me think I'll just stick with my 10D.:lol:

Sep 09, 2005 21:30 as a reply to Pekka's post 2 hours earlier.

Robert

Canon 40D | Canon EOS Elan 7

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Moderator

Cocker Spaniel Mod

Jon's Avatar
68,812 posts

Joined Jun 2004

Bethesda, MD USA
MORE INFO

How's this for rationalization?
I figure that by getting a FF body, I'll save the $500-$800 I'd otherwise have to spend on a 10-?? lens since I'll be able to use my current Sigma 15-30 as an ultra-wide! So a 5D will really only cost me between $2400-$2700, and I won't have that other lens to haul around.

Sep 12, 2005 13:17

Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

LOG IN TO REPLY
BlueTit
Senior Member
BlueTit's Avatar
714 posts

Joined Apr 2005

Dublin, Ireland
MORE INFO

Jon I love your logic, that's the way I go about justifying purchases that I really should not make. Number 1 and 5 do it for me. However I am interested in the new N too and cant decide which I would get the most use from, as they are both a lot of money I am treating them as the same price for comparison purposes, the debate goes on ... internally.

Sep 12, 2005 13:34

Daragh
Gear:


Some Photos: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/bluetitexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

16,358 views & 0 likes for this thread
To all prospective 5D purchasers
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00101 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is whakapu
609 guests, 626 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015