Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 03 Jan 2011 (Monday) 14:12
PREV/NEXT

Sigma 18-200 vs Tamron 18-270

 
BabelFish
Junior Member
28 posts
Joined Jan 2011
MORE INFO

I am buying my first DSLR this week. I decided on the Canon T2i and there are bundle packages that I can get with it. I am trying to decide which second lens I should go with. Each lens will end up costing me about the same extra to get. I could get the Canon 55-250mm for less if I decided to not go with either of these.

I can't really tell you what I am going to shoot since I am fairly new with this but I plan on shooting just about everything :). I plan on using it for day to day activities with the family.

The camera already comes with the 18-55 which I plan on using most of the time except for when we are out doing activities where a zoom would really be handy (like little league or something). I thought the 18-whatever would be nice since it would give me the most flexibility without having to monkey around with changing lens (don't want to miss anything at the games).

So which lens do you think would be better for me to get as a second lens?

Sigma 18-200 (+220)
Tamron 18-270 (+300)
or just stay with the Canon 55-250? (+0)

is the extra cost worth the initial investment for these other lenses? Thanks in advance for your help.

Jan 03, 2011 14:12



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,908 posts

Joined Jun 2005
MORE INFO

Welcome to POTN. Have a great stay.

Stick with the 55-250 IS if you have the 18-55 IS already.

If you really want an all-in-one, then get the Tamron 18-270 VC.

Jan 03, 2011 14:17



LOG IN TO REPLY
BabelFish
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
28 posts
Joined Jan 2011
MORE INFO

why would I not want an all-in-one?

Jan 03, 2011 14:21



LOG IN TO REPLY
kumicho
Senior Member
kumicho's Avatar
399 posts

Joined Jan 2007

Lawn Guyland
MORE INFO

BabelFish wrote in post #11565304external link
why would I not want an all-in-one?

In general asking one lens to do everything won't give you the same quality as splitting those duties up amongst 2 or more lenses. If you're going to be keeping/using your 18-55mm for most "walkaround" duties but want something with more range (and are willing to drop ~$600), look at the Canon 70-200mm f4 L? That way you have your everyday lens covered, and you can switch to the longer one when you go out. Plus the 70-200mm f4 is an incredible lens...

The main advantages of the "all-in-one" are that they easier to use (instead of having to switch lenses), cheaper (often than 2 separate lenses), and are usually adequate at a lot of things. Sort of the "jack of all trades, master of none" lens.

Jan 03, 2011 14:41

Canon 400d
Tamron 17-50 f/2.8
Canon 100mm f/2.0
Canon EOS M
Canon 22mm f/2.0

LOG IN TO REPLY
BabelFish
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
28 posts
Joined Jan 2011
MORE INFO

kumicho wrote in post #11565429external link
In general asking one lens to do everything won't give you the same quality as splitting those duties up amongst 2 or more lenses. If you're going to be keeping/using your 18-55mm for most "walkaround" duties but want something with more range (and are willing to drop ~$600), look at the Canon 70-200mm f4 L? That way you have your everyday lens covered, and you can switch to the longer one when you go out. Plus the 70-200mm f4 is an incredible lens...

The main advantages of the "all-in-one" are that they easier to use (instead of having to switch lenses), cheaper (often than 2 separate lenses), and are usually adequate at a lot of things. Sort of the "jack of all trades, master of none" lens.

that is more than I was wanting to invest... so you also would recommend the 55-250 (instead of the 70-200)? how much of a difference are we talking when going from an 18-270 vs a 55-250 in terms of quality of the pictures?

Jan 03, 2011 14:55



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,908 posts

Joined Jun 2005
MORE INFO

BabelFish wrote in post #11565525external link
that is more than I was wanting to invest... so you also would recommend the 55-250 (instead of the 70-200)? how much of a difference are we talking when going from an 18-270 vs a 55-250 in terms of quality of the pictures?

Spend some time looking at my test here http://www.pbase.com/l​ightrules/superzoomtes​texternal link . Be sure to memorize the letter designations for the lenses you are interested in.

In short, the superzoom is very good, but the 55-250 IS is better, especially at the borders.

Jan 03, 2011 15:19



LOG IN TO REPLY
Canonball24
Member
Canonball24's Avatar
56 posts

Joined Jan 2011

Maine
MORE INFO

I have a Tamron 18-250 and just with the top range of 250 is still really good for what I shoot.Most of the time I don't have to shoot over that range because I live in the city where there are mostly houses close together and busy roads and streets.I guess it is depending on where you live or are going to travel.If I were you I would get the Tamron because I love mine.

Jan 03, 2011 15:31

http://www.wix.com .../wwwsmittysphotogra​phycomexternal link
gear:canon EOS 10D,Tamaron 18-250mm,canon 50mm,vivitar flash,Canon Rebel 35mm:)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
Cream of the Crop
15,678 posts
GALLERY: 7 photos
Joined Mar 2009

Issaquah, WA USA
MORE INFO

LightRules wrote in post #11565284external link
Welcome to POTN. Have a great stay.

Stick with the 55-250 IS if you have the 18-55 IS already.

If you really want an all-in-one, then get the Tamron 18-270 VC.

This is pretty much it. I shot with the 18-270 when I first got started but that was because I picked up my body without any lenses.

The 18-270 is a fine lens for getting started with, but it would be cheaper by far to simply add the 55-250 if you already have an 18-55.

The new piezio drive 18-270 is on its way and I'll curious to see how it compares to the previous version.

Jan 03, 2011 15:39

- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlifeexternal link (7D MkII, 7D, 40D, Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS, Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro, Tamron 18-270 DiII PZD, 580EX II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

LOG IN TO REPLY
ps_n_dslr
Senior Member
408 posts
Joined Oct 2010
MORE INFO

55-250 IS - is a dream - very affordable zoom.
But I see your point- I had an XSi w/ 18-55IS and craved the reach of a simple walkabout (which I thought for me was around ~100 on a crop body). So I upgraded to the 18-135 IS.
I did consider the 18-200 IS from canon and the 18-270 VC from Tamron but chose the 18-135 based on the extra $200 that I would need to put for those two. I didn't choose the 28-135 which I now find to be a better lens than the 18-135 (usm + fTM) because 28 is too narrow for home use.
If money is not an issue - 18-270 VC would get my vote.
don't forget to sell your 18-55 and 55-250 - might be able to help recover some moolah

Jan 03, 2011 15:53



LOG IN TO REPLY
BabelFish
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
28 posts
Joined Jan 2011
MORE INFO

what is a good website to find lenses used?

Jan 03, 2011 16:21 as a reply to ps_n_dslr's post 27 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
Cream of the Crop
15,678 posts
GALLERY: 7 photos
Joined Mar 2009

Issaquah, WA USA
MORE INFO

I've heard lots of good stuff about www.keh.comexternal link, but haven't ordered from them myself.

Jan 03, 2011 16:56

- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlifeexternal link (7D MkII, 7D, 40D, Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS, Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro, Tamron 18-270 DiII PZD, 580EX II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,860 views & 0 likes for this thread
Sigma 18-200 vs Tamron 18-270
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00079 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
Latest registered member is sl1cksta
693 guests, 564 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014