Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk
Thread started 13 Jan 2011 (Thursday) 15:33
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Double Exposure

 
Bob ­ Sherwood
Senior Member
275 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Mississippi
Jan 13, 2011 15:33 |  #1

OK, I have done over 1,000 weddings since the early 80's and seen a lot of fads come and go. Back in the medium format days, I always used a Lindhall mat box and the double exposure/montage images were real popular. I'm talking about the ones made by masking off parts of the negative using positive/negative masks...bride looking down on the ceremony, etc. Well, I've been digital since 2003 and no one, until yesterday has even asked for this type of image. I had a bride and her mom come into the studio and of course, mom had these images in her album. I actually used to show a dozen or more "doubles" with each set of proofs. How in the world would I duplicate these images today without spending tons of computer time? Any suggestions.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
TheBurningCrown
Goldmember
TheBurningCrown's Avatar
4,882 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Jan 13, 2011 16:03 |  #2

What I'm gathering is that you want to do a shot where someone in the initial frame is somewhere else in the shot. If you know how to use Photoshop this will take ten seconds.
1.) Take initial shot.
2.) Move positions.
3.) Take second shot.

Layer the shots over each-other in photoshop and use a layer mask to reveal the area of the second shot you want to be visible. As long as the camera didn't move and the exposure settings are the same you should have no problems. If you want to get more complex you can start dealing with shadows and such, but that's only if you feel it's necessary.


-Dave
Gear List & Feedback
flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
fklimek04
Member
120 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Jan 14, 2011 12:19 |  #3

Buy a D3x... just sayin'.


Digital killed the Kodachrome star!
With a list of gear like that, what is your excuse?

LOG IN TO REPLY
beano
Goldmember
beano's Avatar
4,160 posts
Joined May 2006
Berkshire. UK
Jan 15, 2011 06:38 |  #4

I agree with Dave, wouldn't take you long in photoshop... It's what layers are for ya know. ;)

Just tap Photoshop blending tutorials into google.. Here'sexternal link an example.


Scott

flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Calicajun
Goldmember
Calicajun's Avatar
Joined Jan 2008
Quartz Hill, CA
Jan 15, 2011 19:00 as a reply to beano's post |  #5

Beano, thanks for the link, it's just what I was looking to do.:)


Remember, Stressed spelled backward is Desserts.:)
Suggestions welcome.
5DIII, EF 50 1.4, EF 40 f2.8, EF 24-105L IS , EF 70-200 f4L IS, 580EX ll

LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Peacefield's Avatar
4,022 posts
Joined Jul 2008
NJ
Jan 17, 2011 07:28 |  #6

I used to do these, also back in the 80's. It was real obnoxious because it would take one camera completely out of commission for a while. For instance, a common shot was the bride's head looking down on the ceremony. Well, you'd shoot the bride's head with the bottom masked off and could not use that camera again until you were up in the balcony shooting the ceremony with the top masked off. ugh!

Absolutely, there is no reason not to do this in photoshop now.


Robert Wayne Photographyexternal link

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
50,590 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Wellington, New Zealand
Jan 17, 2011 16:02 |  #7

"I'm sorry but we haven't offered that effect for 20 years, but i'd be happy to have our retoucher do it in Photoshop. There's an additional charge for this work.".


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,413 views & 0 likes for this thread
Double Exposure
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0015 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is curmudgeony
1067 guests, 618 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016