Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting
Thread started 10 Feb 2011 (Thursday) 09:37
PREV/NEXT

Kacey 22" Beauty Dish vs. Cheeta Speed Pro 16" Beauty Dish ??

 
m.shalaby
Goldmember
3,441 posts
Joined Dec 2009
MORE INFO

22" Kacey: - $279 solution with bracket
http://www.kaceyenterp​rises.com/?page_id=461external link

16" Cheeta: $129 solution with bracket
http://www.cheetahstan​d.com ...d-Pro-16%22-Beauty/Detailexternal link

I'm considering both of these for indoor & outdoor shoots with my 430EX. I would get the appropriate shoe mount adapter for each.

As it stand, the Cheeta is about 1/2 the price total with mount adapter so I'm leaning toward that, but beauty dishes are new to me so looking for input. 16" vs. 22" ?

What do you recommend and why?

Feb 10, 2011 09:37



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
m.shalaby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,441 posts
Joined Dec 2009
MORE INFO

just to add, the Cheeta adds a sock diffuser as well in the price, while the Kacey is extra.

from my research, it seems the Cheeta is a bargain... also considering i have a Qbox 24 on the way, perhaps having a smaller 16" light modifier would be nice for versitility.

but at the same time, i'm wondering if i'm missing something here... if there's a big difference i'm not 'in the know' about....

any input guys?

Feb 10, 2011 10:06



LOG IN TO REPLY
KurtGoss
Senior Member
453 posts
Joined Sep 2010
MORE INFO
banned

16" vs 22" is a major difference in size, if you put them next to each other it is surprising how much there is a difference.

Feb 10, 2011 10:12 as a reply to m.shalaby's post 6 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
TMR Design's Avatar
23,881 posts

Joined Feb 2006

Huntington Station, NY
MORE INFO

That 6" difference in diameter is significant. If you're just using it as a reflector for fill or accents then it's no big deal but if you're using it as your main light source then the difference is huge, both in terms of quality of light and coverage.

The smaller dish will require that you use it closer than the 22" to achieve the same quality of light and if you want soft light you really must add the sock and work it VERY close to your subject.

The 16" dish is nice but I don't particularly care for it as a main light source.

Feb 10, 2011 10:29 as a reply to KurtGoss's post 16 minutes earlier.

Please call me Robert or Rob, not TMR
Gear List & Feedback | The Lighting Academyexternal link
"Art is the elimination of the unnecessary." - Pablo Picasso

LOG IN TO REPLY
m.shalaby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,441 posts
Joined Dec 2009
MORE INFO

yeah, size is the ovbious difference.

I should note, I have a QBox 24 in transit to me right now... and I believe the 22" Kacey will yield a similar look being its a white dish - do you think it will be a little redundant?

while the Cheeta is silver coated, so it should yield a more contrasty higher efficient light.

If you had the QBox 24 already, which would you go with?

Feb 10, 2011 10:30 as a reply to KurtGoss's post 17 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
TMR Design's Avatar
23,881 posts

Joined Feb 2006

Huntington Station, NY
MORE INFO

I own a Cheetah Qbox24 and a Speedotron 22" beauty dish. They are very different animals.

The dish is shallow, the qbox is deep. The dish, even with a white interior has no other diffusion and less travel for the light to further diffuse. The qbox can have up to 2 layers of diffusion. That and the depth of the box contribute to a very soft, diffused light.

I don't consider a 22" beauty dish and a 24" softbox to be at all redundant.

Feb 10, 2011 10:44 as a reply to m.shalaby's post 14 minutes earlier.

Please call me Robert or Rob, not TMR
Gear List & Feedback | The Lighting Academyexternal link
"Art is the elimination of the unnecessary." - Pablo Picasso

LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
16,714 posts
Joined Nov 2007

Bay Area, CA
MORE INFO

I have kacey dish (dual speedlite option) and QBox, like Robert mentioned two different things. But I would just play with QBox24" right now and then add dish later.

Feb 10, 2011 10:53

5dmk3, Sigma Art 35mm f1.4, 35L, 85L II, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2

LOG IN TO REPLY
m.shalaby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,441 posts
Joined Dec 2009
MORE INFO

Gotcha, thanks for the input guys.

I take it you like the Kacey better than the Cheeta overall than due to size, silver vs. white aside?

Feb 10, 2011 11:02 as a reply to bobbyz's post 8 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
16,714 posts
Joined Nov 2007

Bay Area, CA
MORE INFO

Kacey is better build, can support dual speedlites and bigger.

Feb 10, 2011 11:44

5dmk3, Sigma Art 35mm f1.4, 35L, 85L II, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2

LOG IN TO REPLY
m.shalaby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,441 posts
Joined Dec 2009
MORE INFO

you guys are saying the Qbox and B-Dish are "two totally different things". What are the exact differences? i know, i know... noob question

i know you'll get round catch lights vs. square in eyes, but other then that ??

Feb 10, 2011 12:17 as a reply to bobbyz's post 32 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
16,714 posts
Joined Nov 2007

Bay Area, CA
MORE INFO

Honestly I would try some reading on what the beauty dish does. Look at some beauty dish shots vs softbox.

Here is one the sites which will show comparison. Select beauty dish on one and softbox on other.

http://www.hensel.eu ...?no_cache=1&lcat=7&​rcat=9external link

Feb 10, 2011 14:26

5dmk3, Sigma Art 35mm f1.4, 35L, 85L II, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
m.shalaby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,441 posts
Joined Dec 2009
MORE INFO

bobbyz wrote in post #11816876external link
Honestly I would try some reading on what the beauty dish does. Look at some beauty dish shots vs softbox.

Here is one the sites which will show comparison. Select beauty dish on one and softbox on other.

http://www.hensel.eu ...?no_cache=1&lcat=7&​rcat=9external link

excellent! thanks!

i really like the lighting a beauty dish provides...

so I guess i'm back to my original question comparing the Cheeta vs. the Kacey.

The Cheeta comes with a white sock diffuser. Do you think this will give the 'white dish look' ?

Feb 10, 2011 15:35



LOG IN TO REPLY
m.shalaby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,441 posts
Joined Dec 2009
MORE INFO

m.shalaby wrote in post #11817320external link
excellent! thanks!

i really like the lighting a beauty dish provides...

so I guess i'm back to my original question comparing the Cheeta vs. the Kacey.

The Cheeta comes with a white sock diffuser. Do you think this will give the 'white dish look' ?

anyone on this last question^ ?

Feb 11, 2011 08:15



LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
16,714 posts
Joined Nov 2007

Bay Area, CA
MORE INFO

I haven't used sock on my dish but I would assume it will give more a look of the softbox. Generally you want the use the dish pretty close so 22" is better in that regard than 16".

Feb 11, 2011 08:23

5dmk3, Sigma Art 35mm f1.4, 35L, 85L II, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2

LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
TMR Design's Avatar
23,881 posts

Joined Feb 2006

Huntington Station, NY
MORE INFO

If you're still comparing the 16" to the 22" they're still very different. I might be alone here but I just don't find that any modification to the 16" dish gives 1. The look I like, or 2. The look of the 22" dish.

As I mentioned earlier, versatility of the 22" is much greater and you're not forced to work so close to the subject.

If you use the very loose rule of thumb that says the optimal distance for a modifier is between 1 and 1.5 times the diameter, or longest edge in the case of a softbox.

That puts the 16" dish between 16" and 24". That's pretty close and you'll be framing very tightly.

Using the rule of thumb with a 22" dish puts you between 22" and 33". I find that to be a much better working distance. Many people use the 22" dish at about 3 feet from the subject and it's a great look.

So, if you're dead set on getting the 16" dish then the diffusion sock helps but won't get you the same look at the 22" unless you're super close.

Feb 11, 2011 08:25 as a reply to m.shalaby's post 10 minutes earlier.

Please call me Robert or Rob, not TMR
Gear List & Feedback | The Lighting Academyexternal link
"Art is the elimination of the unnecessary." - Pablo Picasso

LOG IN TO REPLY

8,383 views & 0 likes for this thread
Kacey 22" Beauty Dish vs. Cheeta Speed Pro 16" Beauty Dish ??
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00213 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is MrVMeldrew
698 guests, 677 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014