stax Senior Member  731 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Oakland More info | Apr 25, 2010 21:27 | #1 On full frame, is 17-40 and 35L redundant or can you justify having both in the kit. http://www.flickr.com/photos/staxnet/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tongsy Member 120 posts Joined Jan 2010 More info | Apr 25, 2010 21:31 | #2 the 35L wouldn't be redundant if you needed the large aperture vs the 17-40s f4 Feedback 1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 25, 2010 21:39 | #3 tongsy wrote in post #10065010  the 35L wouldn't be redundant if you needed the large aperture vs the 17-40s f4 OK. That's what I am thinking. If I go FF, I definitely want to go wider than 35, which is the widest EF focal length that I currently own. Thus, I am looking at purchasing the 17-40. http://www.flickr.com/photos/staxnet/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mxracer535 Goldmember  1,140 posts Likes: 7 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Denver, CO More info | Apr 25, 2010 22:57 | #4 I have both, and both have completely different uses...definitely not redundant NADA...sold off my gear and bought a motorcycle. I might be back shooting someday...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 26, 2010 01:07 | #5 mxracer535 wrote in post #10065437 I have both, and both have completely different uses...definitely not redundant Yeah,I'm not going to get the 35's shallow DOF and low light capabilities with the 17-40. I use the 35 so much, I guess I am a little worried the 17-40 will sit in the bag. Then again, I do use the 10-22 quite a bit on the crop. http://www.flickr.com/photos/staxnet/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jam.radonc Goldmember  1,187 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Dublin More info | Apr 26, 2010 01:18 | #6 I have both the 24L II and the 17-40L and I use them regularly. Heck I'm even thinking about the 35L... Jam
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mxracer535 Goldmember 1,140 posts Likes: 7 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Denver, CO More info | Apr 26, 2010 01:55 | #7 stax wrote in post #10065918 Yeah,I'm not going to get the 35's shallow DOF and low light capabilities with the 17-40. I use the 35 so much, I guess I am a little worried the 17-40 will sit in the bag. Then again, I do use the 10-22 quite a bit on the crop. Thanks for the reply. I use my 35L for about 95% of time (I love it that much), so the 17-40 doesnt see much action...but it definitely does have its uses and is nice to have in the bag. Jam.radonc wrote in post #10065956 I have both the 24L II and the 17-40L and I use them regularly. Heck I'm even thinking about the 35L...  I REALLY want the 24L, only bought the 17-40 because i can't afford it right now...sad NADA...sold off my gear and bought a motorcycle. I might be back shooting someday...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
magwai Goldmember 1,094 posts Likes: 17 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Guildford, UK More info | i would need an everyday lens like a 24-70 or 24-105 too. i love primes but for people photos in different situations i need to have a zoom.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
THETROOPER Senior Member  737 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: Wales,U.K More info | Apr 26, 2010 04:02 | #9 My 17-40 is welded on my 5DII, awesome. 5DII GRIPPED - 17-40L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is reverse222 658 guests, 111 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
