Those look completely out of focus too.
Anke "that rump shot is just adorable" UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009 ![]() 30,454 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK More info | May 23, 2010 23:25 | #17 MLphoto wrote in post #10234213 ![]() here are some random photos from today to show you an example, full resoltuon straight from the camera: http://img203.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=img4060rc.jpg ![]() so basically this isn't exactly the best lens for what I'm shooting mounted on a 1.6 crop body? maybe something like a 35mm would be better. No part of these images is remotely in focus. You weren't shooting MF were you? Can you do a test shoot on a newspaper for instance and focus on the large type so we can see if the lens focuses ok? Has it worked ok before? Anke
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crn3371 Cream of the Crop ![]() 7,198 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: SoCal, USA More info | May 23, 2010 23:29 | #18 Shot #1, maybe the nose of the car is in focus, but hard to tell. Shot #2 is entirely out of focus. Shot #3 shows the effects of narrow dof when shooting at f1.8. The front of the car is in focus, the rear isn't. Also, the more separation you can put between your subject and the background, the better the bokeh.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
krb Cream of the Crop ![]() 8,818 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together More info | May 23, 2010 23:30 | #19 MLphoto wrote in post #10234213 ![]() here are some random photos from today to show you an example, full resoltuon straight from the camera: http://img203.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=img4060rc.jpg ![]() so basically this isn't exactly the best lens for what I'm shooting mounted on a 1.6 crop body? maybe something like a 35mm would be better. You may or may not want a lens that is wider, but the focal length is not the issue with these shots. -- Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid ![]() More info | May 23, 2010 23:30 | #20 crn3371 wrote in post #10234277 ![]() Shot #1, maybe the nose of the car is in focus, but hard to tell. Shot #2 is entirely out of focus. Shot #3 shows the effects of narrow dof when shooting at f1.8. The front of the car is in focus, the rear isn't. Also, the more separation you can put between your subject and the background, the better the bokeh.
Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | And as a followup, AI Servo should only be used for moving subjects...for shots like this focus will jump to whatever is under your active focus point. My bet is that you were using AI Servo and the "focus/recompose" method of feing your shots. - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 23, 2010 23:39 | #22 I guess I'll shoot at a lower aperature next time, thats all I needed to know thanks http://flickr.com/marcel-lech-photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid ![]() More info | May 23, 2010 23:44 | #23 MLphoto wrote in post #10234314 ![]() I guess I'll shoot at a lower aperature next time, thats all I needed to know thanks ![]() it's not a DOF problem...there's nothing in focus in any of your shots... Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rx7speed Goldmember 1,204 posts Joined Jun 2008 More info | May 23, 2010 23:49 | #24 to the OP you have a couple things. first is none of your shots even look like they made it in focus. with that it doesn't matter what you do if the focus isn't down. this should be visable through the viewfinder that the images aren't focused before you take the picture. the 50 1.8 is kinda of hit and miss at times with focus it seems though not always Snydremark wrote in post #10234290 ![]() And as a followup, AI Servo should only be used for moving subjects...for shots like this focus will jump to whatever is under your active focus point. My bet is that you were using AI Servo and the "focus/recompose" method of feing your shots. This would lead to your focus shifting behind the cars, which at 1.8 would be utterly OOF. some of us us ai-focus all the time without problem even if we have to do the focus and recompose method. that's what the af-on button or the * button is for with disabling focus on half press of the shutter digital: 7d 70-200L 2.8 IS MKII, 17-55 2.8 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 44 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | May 23, 2010 23:50 | #25 DreDaze wrote in post #10234346 ![]() it's not a DOF problem...there's nothing in focus in any of your shots... yeah it won't hurt to stop down your aperture...but you'd still have bad shots coming out with the same settings...
Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | May 24, 2010 00:02 | #26 MLphoto wrote in post #10234314 ![]() I guess I'll shoot at a lower aperature next time, thats all I needed to know thanks ![]() And One Shot AF - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jimmyneyugn Member ![]() 134 posts Joined May 2009 Location: orange county, ca More info | May 24, 2010 00:08 | #27 this is a very informative thread.. i've learned a lot! i have shot (still) cars before with a 50 1.8 and didn't really have that much problem.. then again.. i think it's cuz i had the shutter open for a while. Exposure: 8.0 sec Aperture: 14.0 Focal Length: 50mm ISO: 100 Exposure: 13.0 sec Aperture: 14.0 Focal Length: 50mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 44 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | May 24, 2010 00:11 | #28 Also you used f14 for plenty of DOF - not f1.8 Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TCOMC Member 225 posts Joined Jan 2010 More info | May 24, 2010 00:25 | #29 jimmyneyugn wrote in post #10234426 ![]() this is a very informative thread.. i've learned a lot! i have shot (still) cars before with a 50 1.8 and didn't really have that much problem.. then again.. i think it's cuz i had the shutter open for a while. Exposure: 8.0 sec Aperture: 14.0 Focal Length: 50mm It's always nice to see a Miata.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argar Senior Member ![]() 840 posts Likes: 7 Joined Apr 2010 Location: Rhode Island More info | May 24, 2010 00:34 | #30 If you still belive that your AF doesnt work correctly.... if the lens it's still under warranty send to Canon for checking.... it's free ....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is austenhunterphoto 1573 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |