Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 28 May 2010 (Friday) 16:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

70-300mm IS vs. 70-200mm f/4L

 
Rayne
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
     
May 28, 2010 17:54 as a reply to  @ post 10263708 |  #16

For what its worth, I have a 70-300mm and am planning on selling it for a 70-200L. I've never been completely happy with the sharpness of my 70-300.


Gear List | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
That_Fox
"In the Witless Protection Program"
Avatar
1,386 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Southern California
     
May 28, 2010 17:54 |  #17

hsmoscout wrote in post #10263734 (external link)
So you think the sharpness is worth the hassle of the TC, the weight, the size

Yes, it is more than worth it. The loss of IS is the only unfortunate factor, but with wildlife photography you'd want to keep the shutter speed high anyway to prevent subject movement.

hsmoscout wrote in post #10263734 (external link)
and the awkward stares from random strangers that I've heard come with big white L lenses?

This is the most comical part of owning a white lens. The ridiculously stupid things people say to you :lol:

Click here for comedy :p


Apparently I've been dubbed Foxy.
Alamy (external link), website (external link) and gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Boxmannn
Member
99 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Bear, DE
     
May 28, 2010 18:20 |  #18

DavidTK wrote in post #10263615 (external link)
Tough call, but even as a happy former owner of a 70-300, I'd go with the 70-200 IS. I did like the fact that the 70-300 was small and the IS was pretty good, but the focus was slow at times. I was able to get some pretty good pictures from it (see my thread below), but there were plenty of times I found the sharpness lacking. If that's your main priority, I say go with the 70-200 and crop or buy an extender.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=750950

+1 . When the focus was on it was great. Liked the color, range, and form factor, but sometimes the focus was maddingly slow and inconsistant. One day it was great, other days in slightly different light it was terrible. My .02


https://photography-on-the.net …?p=1193134&post​count=1656Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phreeky
Goldmember
3,515 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Australia
     
May 28, 2010 19:53 |  #19

Most 70-300 copies seem to be very good up to about 200mm and then taper off towards 300mm, but are good again at 300mm @ F/8. The softening is a slight halo sort of look that a lot of 100-400 copies seem to exhibit @ 400mm also.

I think the longer lenses get judged much more harshly because when people want reach they also tend to want more and more, and will crop their shots heavily too.

In summary if you're an extreme pixel peeper I think the 70-300 will disappoint. It's for taking photos, not for gear critics.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,316 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 415
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
May 28, 2010 20:26 |  #20

shaftmaster wrote in post #10263762 (external link)
Is the 70-300 IS that much smaller? I own the 70-200 f/4L IS and I used to own the 75-300 IS and they seemed about the same size to me, but the 70-200 is probably heavier due to the better construction.

Size is really not a factor. Get the 70-200 4L

Here are some advantages the 70-200 has over the 70-300:

1) True "Ring Type" USM which provides full time manual focus.
2) Non rotating front element.
3) Internal focusing (lens length always stays the same)
4) Constant f4 aperture
5) Compatible with a 1.4 teleconverter
6) Focus distance scale
7) Better Build

IMAGE: http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y17/msowsun/photo%20stuff/Telephoto-Zoom-Lens-Comparison-5.jpg
IMAGE: http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y17/msowsun/photo%20stuff/Telephoto-Zoom-Lens-Comparison-6.jpg

Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phreeky
Goldmember
3,515 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Australia
     
May 28, 2010 21:17 |  #21

The 70-300 IS is still lighter (much lighter and smaller when the TC is factored in), has IS, and an extra 100mm built-in. Also certainly cheaper than a 70-200 with a TC.

It's a tough choice. Cheaper versatility versus more expensive better IQ. IMO it depends what you're using it for. My 70-300 IS is mostly for airshows these days and I wouldn't use a 70-200 in its place.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Meanderthal
Senior Member
Avatar
532 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Canada, btw Ottawa-Toronto
     
May 28, 2010 21:32 |  #22

As a happy two-camera family, we have both the 70-300 and the 70-200IS. We agree with the 7 points above. However, different tools for different purposes. For no-fuss snapshots in daylight of family, pets, walking on woodland trails, the 70-300 is very fine. It is light, has good reach, and is durable enough for normal use. The 70-200 is a delight for more creative and demanding shots, especially for prints larger than 8'' x 10". When both are available, I sometimes reach for one, other times for the other, depending on my mood. When viewed on screen, friends and family have never commented on the difference in the results. Be happy.


http://spitzhaven.zenf​olio.com/ (external link)Photo gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
john ­ stakes
Senior Member
424 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
May 28, 2010 22:00 |  #23

All very good info here. Just ask yourself if you want the best quality pictures, or if you want "convenient-good enough sometimes" pictures.


Canon 50D, T2i, 70-200 2.8L, kit lenses
My real name is Curtis. John Stakes is my old DBA.
[URL]Blogger[URL="http://www.cnote​vp.blogspot.com"]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hsmoscout
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,166 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Camera Addicts Anonymous
     
May 29, 2010 10:26 as a reply to  @ john stakes's post |  #24

Well, I think all these comments make the choice pretty obvious. I'll order the 70-200mm tonight and soon I will be a proud L owner. :D


My Gear
˙ʇsod uı ʇı xıɟ

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neonlazer
Senior Member
343 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
May 31, 2010 11:01 |  #25

hsmoscout wrote in post #10266840 (external link)
Well, I think all these comments make the choice pretty obvious. I'll order the 70-200mm tonight and soon I will be a proud L owner. :D

Ditto! I will guarrantee you will enjoy it :cool:


Flickr (external link)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,809 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
70-300mm IS vs. 70-200mm f/4L
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Dave In Hawaii
1337 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.