Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 27 May 2010 (Thursday) 16:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Half of a Grand Teton Panorama

 
Tcon
Member
169 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, CA
     
May 27, 2010 16:29 |  #1

Below is half a pano I took at Grand Teton the two halfs did not stitch very well together. Without having to do copius amounts of work here is the other half. Let me know what you think!

IMAGE: http://www.renekohut.com/potn/TetonPano1b-2.jpg

http://www.renekohut.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
bakedcookies
Senior Member
860 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
May 27, 2010 17:06 |  #2

Stunning! Frame and hang it! Great shot!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gixxer
Goldmember
Avatar
2,035 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Mountains of North Carolina
     
May 27, 2010 18:43 |  #3

Nice shot, I'm not real sure about the processing though. The upper half of the image looks like it has a sepia tone to it? Maybe it would work better if the whole image was processed this way or not at all.


Daniel
flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |ImageCarolina.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
squashed
Goldmember
Avatar
4,178 posts
Gallery: 74 photos
Likes: 2016
Joined Oct 2006
Location: MidEastCali
     
May 27, 2010 22:03 |  #4

Looks powerful !!


Done with Numbers. Own the X and the R
http://www.garyyoungph​otography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
verb1
Member
Avatar
74 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: S.F.
     
May 28, 2010 01:13 |  #5

B&W and a little sharpening brings out the drama.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


My Flickr (external link)
Canon 7D | Canon 24-105L | Canon 10-22 | Canon 100-400L | Canon 50mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DANATTHEROCK
Goldmember
Avatar
1,264 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
May 28, 2010 01:32 |  #6

I love the capture, but agree the two tone look is odd.


Canon 5D Mark II & 50D with 17-40, 24-105, 100-400, 50 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8 macro, and 1.4TC

FEISOL CT-3442 (ARL) tripod w/ Photo Clam 40-NS ballhead:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tcon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
169 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, CA
     
May 28, 2010 13:20 |  #7

Alright, I took the advice and went into photoshop fixed the stitch, and went -32 Vibrance and +4 Saturation. So below you will find the full panorama in colour and b/w.

Here is the colour version:

IMAGE: http://www.renekohut.com/potn/TetonPano1Full.jpg

Here is the black and white:
IMAGE: http://www.renekohut.com/potn/TetonPano1Full-BW.jpg

Let me know what you think!

http://www.renekohut.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Conor ­ McDonald
Member
173 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Northern Ireland
     
May 28, 2010 13:25 |  #8

Last b&w is by far the best. I just dont think the two tone works




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigBlueDodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,726 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Lonestar State
     
May 28, 2010 13:28 |  #9

Tcon wrote in post #10262380 (external link)
Alright, I took the advice and went into photoshop fixed the stitch, and went -32 Vibrance and +4 Saturation. So below you will find the full panorama in colour and b/w.

Here is the colour version:
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND


Here is the black and white:
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND


Let me know what you think!

I'm not a fan of your first picture. I like my mountains to well.....look like mountains. The mountains and sky I'm used to is not purple. I like my grass and trees to be green, and not yellow & purple. The color picture looks completely unnatural to me. I wonder, is your monitor calibrated?

The B&W looks MUCH better without all of the funky colors.


David (aka BigBlueDodge)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tcon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
169 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, CA
     
May 28, 2010 14:04 |  #10

I see that it has a purple tint, but that is how it came out of the camera. I am wondering if it was from a polarizer, though I can't seem to recall if I am using one. I didnt do anything but adjust black, clarity, turned down the vibrance -32, turned up the saturation +4 and left temperature and tint.


http://www.renekohut.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichardA
Senior Member
Avatar
463 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Oklahoma
     
May 29, 2010 09:20 |  #11

I like em all! Love the processing on all......I like that kind of processing though!


Richard
http://www.ra-photography.net (external link)
http://www.herpforum.o​rg/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GJim
Goldmember
Avatar
1,209 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 9
Joined Apr 2010
Location: On the road, Again!
     
May 31, 2010 16:15 |  #12

I much prefer the b/w over the color, in this particular instance. I live very close to the Tetons and they just don't look like your color version.

Nice panorama combo!


G'Jim c):{- ... 50D (Gripped), 7D (Gripped), assorted glass, sundry accouterments.
The beginner clicks the shutter and says "Let's see what I got." ... The experienced photographer thinks "How can I capture what I see?"
My Photography and my Blog: http://www.gjim.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tcon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
169 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, CA
     
May 31, 2010 18:04 |  #13

I agree, I just don't know where the purple tint came from. I do live close to the rockies here in Alberta and am very familiar with them. That same weekend we drove down to yellowstone, the rockies here were blue, VERY blue. To both my eye and the camera. I am thinking it was the very clear skies and maybe high humidity and maybe distance. I have no idea why and am no expert but I have never seen them like that before (this was in the Waterton area).


http://www.renekohut.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigBlueDodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,726 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Lonestar State
     
May 31, 2010 23:31 |  #14

DO you have a calibrated monitor? It is possible that the tinting you see is not showing as strong as on a calibrated monitor (of which mine is). Trying to adjust color on an uncalibrated monitor is a waste of time.

Can you post the originals without any post processing on them?


David (aka BigBlueDodge)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tdragone
Goldmember
Avatar
2,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: San Diego, California
     
Jul 06, 2010 00:19 |  #15

Out of curiosity.. Where did you take this shot from?


-Tom Dragonetti
Spyder Holster + 1Dmk IV, 50D, G11
10-22, 16-35 2.8Lii, , 24-70 2.8Lii, 50mm 1.4,
70-200 2.8Lii IS, 100-400L IS
1.4x TC, 580EX ii, ST-E2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,551 views & 0 likes for this thread
Half of a Grand Teton Panorama
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Dharmadme
1049 guests, 239 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.