That came out nice, Mosephus! We see you used a desaturation brush, but obviously more was done, maybe if we could see what you did with the Basic panel settings we could get a good idea of things.
Thanks for the contribution!
Jun 26, 2010 22:45 | #2416 That came out nice, Mosephus! We see you used a desaturation brush, but obviously more was done, maybe if we could see what you did with the Basic panel settings we could get a good idea of things. Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mosephus Senior Member ![]() 774 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Duncanville, TX More info | Well, I must have been tired, the settings for the brush were for another project.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 27, 2010 01:10 | #2418 Hey, thanks for the more detailed explanation -- it is the sharing of knowledge that has made this thread pretty special for a whole lot of people -- believe it or not, your image inspires people, and your sharing of your process gives people a clue at what they can do! Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mosephus Senior Member ![]() 774 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Duncanville, TX More info | Jun 27, 2010 01:13 | #2419 Here is another I enjoyed, the pic isn't much to look at but, it is a good example of what you can get away with, with RAW. Hopefully this will make up for the lack of info for the last one. Work Final image minus one dust spot. (maybe 2 ![]()
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 27, 2010 01:20 | #2420 Wow, nice conversion, and what a great layout of the work you did! Three cheers! Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sf1 Goldmember ![]() 2,021 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Calgary, Canada More info | Jun 27, 2010 06:06 | #2421 ok...so the light did not fire on this one, but it was such a nice shot I really wanted to recover it. Everything done here is within Aperture 3, including adding the watermark.
Canon 5DII, Canon 1D Mark II N
LOG IN TO REPLY |
elithrar Member ![]() 131 posts Joined Jun 2010 More info | Jun 27, 2010 11:37 | #2422 sf1 wrote in post #10433877 ![]() ok...so the light did not fire on this one, but it was such a nice shot I really wanted to recover it. Everything done here is within Aperture 3, including adding the watermark. Great recovery job — very well done!
FUJI X100
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pallopelle Member 96 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Jun 27, 2010 13:03 | #2423 PS Raw 5.6
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smacafee Member ![]() 248 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: SF Bay Area More info | Jun 29, 2010 01:32 | #2424 ^ nice one pallopelle
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffreyO Member ![]() 182 posts Likes: 4 Joined Feb 2010 More info | This is a reject but still uses the changes made. I'm showing this because I have a question. As you can see in the after picture, there is some very dark ghosting or something going on around the edge of the flower and I can't figure it out. I reduced all of the items that were changed and nothing really did it. The one that made the most difference was the lower shadow level (which is under the RAW tab). It seems to be everything together. All I can do is make the green parts so dark that it blends right in. XSi with grip, Sigma 18-55 f/3.5-5.6, Sigma 28-70 f/2.8, Canon 100 f/2.8 macro, old but great Canon 300 f/4 L, 430 EX II, Quantaray 900W, broken tripods, White Lightnings, many accessories--former pro film, quit, now back into it for fun
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 09, 2010 00:44 | #2426 That's a pretty cool flower and conversion! Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChristopherMadison Senior Member 527 posts Likes: 17 Joined Mar 2009 Location: New Jersey More info |
cfibanez Senior Member ![]() 859 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Stockholm, Sweden More info | Jul 09, 2010 02:55 | #2428 Here is one classic Pompei shot with Vesuvius in the back. Midday sun, crowds all over the place, too bright ski, poor contrast.
Cropping (in Camera Raw) allows focusing on the center temple and eliminates the worst part of the crowd.
Here is the Raw conversion: mainly tone curve for added contrast, graduated filter to pull back the ski and adjustment brush to bring back top of the building and columns that were too dark after the grad filter.
Here are the histograms before (left) and after (right):
One final clone tool in Photoshop (not Raw, I know ... sorry Tony!):
5D4 | 7D2 | 11-24/4.0 L | 16-35/2.8 L III | 24/1.4 L II | 24-105/4.0 L IS | 40/2.8 STM | 85/1.2 L II | 100/2.8 L macro IS | 70-200/2.8 L IS II | 100-400 L IS II | 400/4.0 DO L II | 580EXII | EF 1.4x III | Gitzo monopod GM2541 | Gitzo tripod GT2541 | Really Right Stuff ball head & plates | B+W & Singh-Ray filters
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 09, 2010 08:47 | #2429 Nicely done, cfibanez -- it shows how working with the Raw developing is not about "saving" an image but about enhancing and making the best of the light we are given! Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jhoag Senior Member ![]() More info | Very nicely done - I just saw this a moment ago on the 24-105L thread, and never even noticed. I just thought it was a nice shot of Pompeii, without any people in it, and how lucky (or patient) that was. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is qanik2 466 guests, 152 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |