jbkalla Goldmember  2,831 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Elizabeth, Colorado, USA More info | Jul 07, 2010 10:21 | #1066 mrmarks wrote in post #10487189  Guys, any post processing ideas for my shot below? Thanks It almost looks like a watercolor. Maybe you could push it a little farther in that direction, though it looks good as it is. It is a little small to tell, however. My eyes aren't as good as they used to be! John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
macobee Goldmember  1,843 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Hong Kong More info | Jul 07, 2010 10:46 | #1067
http://www.flickr.com/photos/marcoveringa/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trefleenor Senior Member 293 posts Joined Mar 2010 More info |
http://www.flickr.com/trefleenor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Collin85 Cream of the Crop  8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Jul 09, 2010 08:05 | #1069 ^ powerful shot! Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PrOxY Member  41 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Southern California More info | Jul 10, 2010 00:19 | #1070 blam wrote in post #8614863 just picked this bad boy up tonight. definitely sharper than the 10-22 i had previously owned  Sorry to resurrect this older post, but I had to send my thanks as this image made me smile! Thanks blam PrOxY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blam Goldmember 1,900 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Edmonton, AB, CAN More info | Jul 10, 2010 01:20 | #1071 lol glad you liked it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Jul 10, 2010 12:36 | #1072 Recently got this image on a front cover of a local magazine. 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mrmarks Senior Member 822 posts Likes: 11 Joined Jan 2010 More info | Jul 10, 2010 14:35 | #1073 dru8p wrote in post #10488100 was this handheld? buildings look a little OOF It's sharp in the original. Probably due to loss of resolution during file size reduction
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tjscott Mostly Lurking  12 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Dallas More info | Jul 10, 2010 14:44 | #1074 I might be crazy but I like the 17-35mm better. I shoot with a 7d and for some reason. My 17-35mm comes out sharper than my 16-35mm II. It might be me. The 16-35mm gets soft on around the edges on my 7d. The 17-35mm does not. ...and you'll see yourself in mine eyes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Collin85 Cream of the Crop 8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Jul 10, 2010 23:57 | #1075 Nice work Julian, well deserved! Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Jul 11, 2010 03:41 | #1076 Collin85 wrote in post #10514139 Nice work Julian, well deserved! Thanks Collin!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
denoir Goldmember  1,152 posts Likes: 5 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Stockholm, Sweden More info | Jul 11, 2010 04:07 | #1077 Lovely shot Julian, great composition and light..but IMO you should have used your Zeiss 21 to really bring out the detail of the rocks in the foreground. Luka C.D| My photos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Jul 11, 2010 04:47 | #1078 denoir wrote in post #10514766 Lovely shot Julian, great composition and light..but IMO you should have used your Zeiss 21 to really bring out the detail of the rocks in the foreground. Thanks Luka. This image was taken way before the Zeiss 21 was released.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
peterbj7 Goldmember 3,123 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: A Caribbean island in Belize and occasionally UK More info | Jul 11, 2010 11:18 | #1079 tjscott wrote in post #10511936 I might be crazy but I like the 17-35mm better Do you mean the 17-40? I've heard lots of people say it's sharper than the 16-35. 5D & 7D (both gripped), 24-105L, 100-400L, 15-85, 50 f1.8, Tamron 28-75, Sigma 12-24, G10, EX-Z55 & U/W housing, A1+10 lenses, tripods, lighting gear, etc. etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jacuff Goldmember  2,581 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Searcy, AR More info | Jul 11, 2010 21:13 | #1080 peterbj7 wrote in post #10515924 Do you mean the 17-40? I've heard lots of people say it's sharper than the 16-35. There is also a 17-35mm f/2.8L. http://www.canon.com …oom/ef_17~35_28l_usm.html Gear, Feedback (eBay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is JTravLog 689 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
