Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 11 Jul 2010 (Sunday) 06:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Posterization in FireFox

 
Full-Frame
Member
Avatar
141 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Jul 11, 2010 06:47 |  #1

I have a strange issue with posterization when viewing images on my Zenfolio pages in Firefox.

Here is an example of one of the images:

http://www.martinneep.​com/portraits/hccb0d8d​#hccb0d8d (external link)

If I look to the right of his shoulder, there is some rather unpleasant posterization.

The strange thing is, if I right click and choose 'share this image' and copy one of the URLs directly into the Firefox address bar, the resultant image displays normally!

e.g. http://www.martinneep.​com/img/s5/v4/p2146338​69-4.jpg (external link)


Viewing my Zenfolio pages in IE shows no posterization whatsoever. At first I thought this might have been my montitor, so I recently purchased a brand new BenQ, which displays exactly the same trait!

What is causing this issue, I'm desperately trying to get to the bottom of it!


My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Full-Frame
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
141 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Jul 11, 2010 06:58 |  #2

Ok, switching off my spyder Elite calibration makes it worse! However, I've just viewed my images on another PC, using the same version of Firefox, and the posterization is not there!

So if it's not the monitor, Firefox or my calibration, what can it be?

I've recently also upgraded to Windows 7, but this has made no difference. Exactly the same posterization was present in Vista?????


My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jul 11, 2010 07:19 |  #3

Those links show pretty small images, too small for my ability to perceive what you're talking about. Can you show an enlarged image, or even better, a selected portion of this image that is enlarged enough so that we can see the problem?

It sounds from what you are saying that different photo site use a different process to "shrink" a photo to a good viewing size. In general, it's good to know what size your site resizes to and match that. But, if the exact same image shows different characteristics when "shared", then I agree something is off...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jul 11, 2010 13:54 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #4

Do you have the latest version of Firefox? And do you have it set for full color management?

In the URL box, type in about:config
Click the "I'll be careful" button
Scroll down to the line for gfx.color_management.m​ode and set it to 1.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Full-Frame
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
141 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Jul 15, 2010 06:24 as a reply to  @ ChasP505's post |  #5

Yes, I have the latest version of Firefox. I have followed your steps and set colour management to 1, but the problem still exists.

As this issue has remained through all versions of firefox, and has been apparent in both Vista and Windows7, would it be wrong to assume that this is a graphics card problem?


My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frank_The_Tank
Member
Avatar
45 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
     
Jul 15, 2010 06:55 as a reply to  @ Full-Frame's post |  #6

You will also need to specify the monitor profile within the browser. I have installed the color management addon for firefox, where I then have the option to choose the spyder profile for my monitor. I'm pretty certain you can follow the steps outlined above and specify the path to the ICC profile, however.

ie: gfx.color_management.d​isplay_profile;C:\WIND​OWS\system32\spool\dri​vers\color\SyncMaster 2333HD(Digital)-1.icm

The reason that IE is not demonstrating the fault is most likely because it's not a color managed browser.


Flickrhttp://www.flickr.com/​photos/franhams/ (external link)
Canon EOS-550D (Gripped) + Canon EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 + Canon EF 75-300mm f4-5.6 III + Canon EF 50mm f1.8 II + Canon EF-S 10-22mm f3.5-4.5 USM + Canon EF 35mm f2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Jul 15, 2010 10:02 |  #7

Frank_The_Tank wrote in post #10540419 (external link)
You will also need to specify the monitor profile within the browser. I have installed the color management addon for firefox, where I then have the option to choose the spyder profile for my monitor. I'm pretty certain you can follow the steps outlined above and specify the path to the ICC profile, however.

ie: gfx.color_management.d​isplay_profile;C:\WIND​OWS\system32\spool\dri​vers\color\SyncMaster 2333HD(Digital)-1.icm

The reason that IE is not demonstrating the fault is most likely because it's not a color managed browser.

You actually don't need to if its specified as the default for the OS. It will be automatically used.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jul 15, 2010 11:48 |  #8

Someone recenty posted this blog about jpeg compresstion but they also mentioned artifacts popping up in Firefox. This was the first I had heard about it, and may be related to other issues, but you might want to check it out for any informations. He mentions it at the end of his presentation and it comes up during the comments as well:

http://regex.info …room-goodies/jpeg-quality (external link)


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Full-Frame
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
141 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Jul 15, 2010 14:08 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #9

I'm so determined to get to the bottom of this!

I've been looking at other people's Zenfolio pages and they are showing the same artifacts on my monitor.


My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Full-Frame
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
141 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Jul 15, 2010 14:41 as a reply to  @ Full-Frame's post |  #10

Attached is a screen capture, does anyone else see the uneven tones in the background? It's more apparent if you look down on the monitor from above.

Here is the link for the original... (external link)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jul 15, 2010 14:53 |  #11

If by uneven tones do you mean areas that are not black, as in they are not actually black?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Full-Frame
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
141 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Jul 15, 2010 15:15 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #12

If by uneven tones do you mean areas that are not black, as in they are not actually black?

No, in the transition between the black areas and the lighter areas there is some purple / green coloured banding and pixelation.


My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Jul 15, 2010 15:34 |  #13

Looks like the way you processed the photo. See if its in the native RAW file with no adjustments.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jul 15, 2010 18:43 |  #14

Full-Frame wrote in post #10543102 (external link)
No, in the transition between the black areas and the lighter areas there is some purple / green coloured banding and pixelation.

Hmm, this is a straight grayscale image with no duotone or split tone stuff going on, right? I don't see this you are talking about -- it may be an issue with your monitor. But I'm working from a small laptop at the moment and my eyes ain't what they used to be...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
57hardtop
Senior Member
Avatar
760 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
     
Jul 15, 2010 22:55 |  #15

I've now looked at this on 3 different monitors (all in Firefox), and I don't see anything wrong :confused:


Roger
Gear list and feedback
http://retouching-on-the.net/forums/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,140 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Posterization in FireFox
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2569 guests, 77 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.