two bodies, 3 lenses.
mikekelley "Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!" ![]() 7,317 posts Likes: 15 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Jul 18, 2010 16:14 | #46 two bodies, 3 lenses. Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 18, 2010 18:48 | #47 Camera Nerd wrote in post #10555430 ![]() Do you still have all those primes, it is impressive. impressive if you actually used them and it is impressive that you actually acquired that many primes, what pulled you away from zooms. Did they have any fast zooms f4 or f 2.8 zooms 34 years ago. Yes, I used all of them. Canon 80D, 60D, Canon 10-22EFs, 15-85EFS IS, Sigma 18-300, Sigma 135/1.8ART, Sigma 30mm f/1.4DC, Canon 60mm EFs Macro, Rokinon 8mm fisheye, 550EX flash, Olympus TG2 underwater P&S
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PrimePerspective Member ![]() 43 posts Joined Jun 2010 More info | Jul 21, 2010 18:03 | #48 Camera Nerd wrote in post #10554961 ![]() I see that you want the sigma 70-200 2.8 OS (stabilization) in your signature. Why? I heard its going to be priced at about 1600 bucks and for 1700-1800 you can get the canon IS version or for 1200-1300 you can get the canon non IS. I had used a friends sigma 70-200 2.8 for about 3 months before i got a 70-200 2.8 and IMHO the canon 70-200 2.8 (non is) blows away the sigma 70-200 2.8 (non os). but that can all change if the new sigma has changed optics, but sigma is know for its notoriously bad quality control. Just my input. I didnt mean the OS the lower one, wahaha, I wasnt paying attention. And as for the canon 70-200 IS if I had the money for that I would definitely use that one -BJ
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Camera Nerd Senior Member 935 posts Joined Nov 2009 More info | Jul 21, 2010 23:02 | #49 PrimePerspective wrote in post #10579483 ![]() I didnt mean the OS the lower one, wahaha, I wasnt paying attention. And as for the canon 70-200 IS if I had the money for that I would definitely use that one ![]() Oh okay, i would definitely get the sigma 70-200 2.8 over a canon f4L (non is), but you should really save up for the canon as it noticeably more accurate and auto focusing. canon 7d, canon 5d classic, 24-70 2.8 L, 70-200 2.8 (non-is) L, .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rivest Cream of the Crop ![]() 6,678 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Canada. More info | Jul 21, 2010 23:07 | #50 I'm leaving for Cuba tomorrow morning, I'm bringing all my gear. Hi, I'm David.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
minimalfear Member ![]() 192 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2008 More info | Jul 21, 2010 23:21 | #51 Alaska was won with a 450D 17-55, 100-400, EX580 Ô¿Ô
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Camera Nerd Senior Member 935 posts Joined Nov 2009 More info | Jul 21, 2010 23:26 | #52 Rivest wrote in post #10580948 ![]() I'm leaving for Cuba tomorrow morning, I'm bringing all my gear. T2i, 70-200 F4, 10-20, 18-55, 50, 430Ex II, tripod, and a lot of memory cards ![]() bring back some cigars canon 7d, canon 5d classic, 24-70 2.8 L, 70-200 2.8 (non-is) L, .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rivest Cream of the Crop ![]() 6,678 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Canada. More info | Jul 21, 2010 23:37 | #53 ^^ Will picture some for you Hi, I'm David.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
newworld666 Goldmember ![]() 2,306 posts Likes: 19 Joined Jan 2009 Location: on earth More info | Jul 22, 2010 00:02 | #54 ... on vacation, I need to be 24 hours ready indoor/outdoor, various situations and I must be able to carry with one R strap and pockets .. Marc
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DeaconG Goldmember ![]() 1,474 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Port St. John, FL More info | Jul 22, 2010 00:46 | #55 Um...ALL of it? It's not like I'm carrying to shoot the Olympics or the World Cup, but you never know... Gripped 5D Mark II & 50D|70-200 2.8 IS L|24-105 L|17-55|10-22|28 1.8|Σ 150-500|Σ 120-300 EX DG|Σ 50 1.4 EX|Σ APO 2X TC|580EXII|various other bits and pieces
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sebr Goldmember ![]() 4,628 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sweden/France More info | Jul 22, 2010 01:30 | #56 I have been carrying 2 bodies + 5 lenses, but I am now trying to travel light and bring what I need. We are now in Indonesia visiting some relatives. Not expecting any special shot opportunity, so I took 5D2, 35L, 135L, 1.4x and 580EXii. Sebastien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cham_001 Senior Member ![]() 879 posts Likes: 58 Joined Feb 2009 Location: based between Ruse, Bulgaria & Recife-Brazil More info | Jul 22, 2010 01:38 | #57 Stuff taken: "... with a clear perspective - the confusion is clearer ..."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MOkoFOko nut impotent and avoiding Geoff ![]() 19,889 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Michigan More info | Jul 22, 2010 02:23 | #58 If I couldn't bring it as a carry-on, I wouldn't bring it at all. The idea of putting expensive glass in check-in luggage... does not sit well with me. If it's not stolen, it ends up being broken.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 22, 2010 22:27 | #59 ![]() So far, here in NYC, I've been using the 16-35 90% of the time, Zeiss 35 and 24-105 the rest. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pleb1024 Senior Member ![]() 313 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Ex Christchurch, New Zealand. Now Atlanta, GA, USA More info | My Yellowstone trip that I just got back from: 7DMkII | 7D | 450D | Canon 18-55 IS | Canon 55-250 | Canon 100-400L MkII | Canon 100-400L | Canon 24-105L | Canon 50mm 1.8 | Canon 1.4x TC II | Tokina 11-16
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is tayson 888 guests, 269 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |