 | IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING! HTTP response: 403 | MIME changed to 'text/html' |
ocabj Goldmember  1,120 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Riverside, CA (USA) More info | Aug 03, 2010 20:59 | #16
Jonathan Ocab - https://www.ocabj.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dlintz Senior Member  613 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Midwest More info | One version takes great pictures, the other version takes AWESOME pictures. Not too tough to figure it out. Doug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
k-lo Goldmember  1,316 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Lost in SN's Canon vs Nikon Thread More info | Aug 04, 2010 00:54 | #18 the person holding a mark I has a smile on this face. the person holding a mark II has a grin. -=Karlo=- 1D III, 5D Mark II, 17-40 4 L, 35 1.4 L 24-70 2.8 L, 135mm 2.0 L, 85mm 1.2 L II, 300mm f 2.8 L, 580EX II, and a crapload of Elinchrom Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
996gt2 Goldmember  1,045 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2008 Location: Cincinnati More info | Aug 04, 2010 01:12 | #19 Is this a troll post or is the OP seriously asking this question? Because the Mark II has "II" painted on the lens body while the Mark I does not. Buy/Sell Feedback
LOG IN TO REPLY |
malla1962 Cream of the Crop  7,714 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk More info | Aug 04, 2010 01:28 | #20 dlintz wrote in post #10657999  One version takes great pictures, the other version takes AWESOME pictures. Not too tough to figure it out.  d. Very true.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jericobot Cream of the Crop  5,128 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 Location: preppingforthetrumpets More info | the similarities? both of which I don't have α7ii + (batis 25 f2 / zeiss 55 f1,8 / macro 90 f2,8)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 04, 2010 09:13 | #22 996gt2 wrote in post #10658593 Is this a troll post or is the OP seriously asking this question? Because the Mark II has "II" painted on the lens body while the Mark I does not. This is not a troll post, I just want to make sure, I haven't see I or II in person.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fidens Member 64 posts Joined Dec 2009 More info | Aug 04, 2010 11:20 | #24 When you look through the Mk II at 2.8 you can see through space and time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kinghong1970 Goldmember  2,093 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 Location: NYC/NJ More info | Aug 04, 2010 12:16 | #25 1) different hood shape with locking button on Mk2 Albert the Clumsy Ape
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 04, 2010 12:49 | #26 kinghong1970 wrote in post #10661027 1) different hood shape with locking button on Mk2 2) different hood material and less prone to scuff on Mk2 3) "II" printed on the silver ring near the front element 4) wider width of focus ring on Mk2 5) "70-200" printed on side of window thingamagijgy on the Mk2 whereas on top on the Mk1 6) lens tapers down smoothly in Mk2 whereas Mk1 tapers down straight 7) "image stabilizer" text placement is different and you can see through space and time... Thank you .......
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ecub Goldmember 1,487 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Southwest suburbs of Chicago More info | Aug 04, 2010 14:18 | #27 If you still can't tell, then I'll sell you uhmm, a brand new, unopened "Mark II" for $2100. I'll even buy it directly and have it shipped to your place. - Ed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikejet Senior Member 573 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: West Covina More info | Will that new hood fit the Mark I? Gear: S95 - Canon 50D - Canon 50mm 1.4 - BG-E2N Grip - R4 Rstrap - 200DG
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is slotpulsa 800 guests, 209 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
... yet 
