I used my 70-200 with converters a lot untill I got my 300. The 70-200 does not get much use nowadays. The 300 is hand holdable for birding but for sports I use a monopod.
Aug 05, 2010 22:05 | #16 I used my 70-200 with converters a lot untill I got my 300. The 70-200 does not get much use nowadays. The 300 is hand holdable for birding but for sports I use a monopod. Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Justin_Thyme Senior Member 984 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Central NJ More info | Aug 05, 2010 22:57 | #17 newworld666 wrote in post #10667892  For outdoor sports .. I love 300L2.8 .. unfortunately it's a bit slow for indoor sport  .. but zoom is not much better for indoorHuh? 2.8 is 2.8 whether it be 70-200 of 300. Ive shot a 300 2.8 wide open under he crappiest lights ever seen and got far better results than even thinkable with a 70-200 2.8 with a TC that just knocked you back to f4.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 19,434 posts Likes: 1614 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Aug 05, 2010 23:13 | #18 Or you can pick 200mm f1.8 or the newer 200mm f2. 5dmk3, 35L, 85L II, 300mm f2.8 IS I, 400mm f5.6
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MTStringer Goldmember  4,650 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2006 Location: Channelview, Tx More info | Aug 05, 2010 23:53 | #19 Shooting high school basketball, I have sat side by side with shooters that work for the various media and they usually carry the 85 f/1.8 and 70-200 f/2.8. Occasionally, they will bring the 300 f/2.8 for shooting the far end of the court. I have seen the 200 f/1.8 a couple of times.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
newworld666 Goldmember  2,306 posts Likes: 19 Joined Jan 2009 Location: on earth More info | Aug 06, 2010 01:03 | #20 Justin_Thyme wrote in post #10670712 Huh? 2.8 is 2.8 whether it be 70-200 of 300. Ive shot a 300 2.8 wide open under he crappiest lights ever seen and got far better results than even thinkable with a 70-200 2.8 with a TC that just knocked you back to f4. That statement made no sense, no offense intended.  The only thing you are going to get that is faster for indoor sports at a shorter FL is a 135L of an 85 1.8 of which I prefer the 135?Unfortunately, for quadbike races and dog agility, indoor halls used for such events are really terrific, nothing less than 4000iso can be used @f2.8, (if you don't do any panning of course)... Marc
LOG IN TO REPLY |
malla1962 Cream of the Crop  7,714 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk More info | Aug 06, 2010 02:29 | #21 eigga wrote in post #10668535 300 2.8 or the 300 f/4 for budget.....never liked the 1.4 on my 70-200. Works great on the 300 and 400 though The 1.4 was ok on my 70-200 mk1 but stunning on the mk2, but I must admit theres nothing like the 300f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 07, 2010 01:31 | #22 i'm leaning towards the 300mm 4L.....i can't justify spending that much for just a hobby....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is tnt2112 1058 guests, 361 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
. 
or a 200L2.0
