Like the title says.. I'm in a debate over waiting and spending the cash on a 70-200 IS USM f/2.8L mark I or II
While yes it's supposed to be a much better model but is it really all that much better than the mark I? Also there is the issue of the massive price difference between the 2 models.
Mark I = 1900 new
Mark II = 2300 new
400 is a lot of money and I'm curious as to whether or not the updates are really worth the 400 dollar price difference on the lens. What do you guys think? Has anyone on here had both and/or used both?
It's going to be a little while before I buy it though, I will need to sell my 91 MR2 first and I'll probably use the money from that to fund the new lens purchase. This way it's not money that I would of been missing as it is and I'll be saving money not paying for insurance on one less vehicle....