Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
Thread started 16 Apr 2009 (Thursday) 21:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 1Ds mark 4

 
waving_odd
Member
86 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Aug 23, 2010 14:55 |  #886

waving_odd wrote in post #10772220 (external link)
no announcement til mid 2011

Got a reply from the CR Guy on the PR post:

"...Bad rumor, it comes from a Calumet employee... folks that have zero clue about what's coming, especially that far into the future. I try not to post them all..."


5D II₧₧₧TS 24 f/3.5L II₧₧₧16-35 f/2.8L II
7D₧₧₧₧₧50 f/1.2L₧₧₧₧24-70 f/2.8L
60D₧₧₧₧_85 f/1.2L II₧₧_70-200 f/2.8L IS
40D___Macro 100 f/2.8L IS_______________
Next: 1D X | 5D III | 35 f/1.4L II | 24-70 f/2.8L II/IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snowboarder
Senior Member
400 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2008
     
Aug 23, 2010 15:43 as a reply to  @ waving_odd's post |  #887

I hope they really made an effort to improve the basic ISO dynamic range.
This is a 1Ds model, not usually used for ISO 10 million...
I want more range in ISO 100-400, that's all I use, ever.
Better shadows mostly. That's all really, 39MP sounds great to me.


You're welcome to visit my website: lenticulartravel.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mastamarek
Goldmember
Avatar
1,882 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
     
Aug 23, 2010 15:47 as a reply to  @ post 9093803 |  #888

39mpx is a 18+mpx jump from the older model. lol. thats almost a double ^_^ not gonna happen. 1Ds4 is gonna have 29.7 (or .9 or .1 lol) with Digic4s and 32mpx with digicV. 29mpx sounds about right. Canon has never made a bigger jump in mpx anyways.


[Facebook® (external link)]
[imassmedia.pl (external link)]
[Flickr (external link)]
[My Blog (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Aug 23, 2010 16:08 as a reply to  @ post 9093803 |  #889

As I've already stated, less than 32MP and I'm not going to play. I'll take my ball home and sulk. If 39MP means I wait another 6 months, then its a price worth paying.

Maybe I need to wait another 3 years, until the 1Ds mk 5 arrives. Again, if need be I can wait. I don't have to buy anything.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mastamarek
Goldmember
Avatar
1,882 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
     
Aug 23, 2010 16:14 |  #890

Lowner wrote in post #10773724 (external link)
As I've already stated, less than 32MP and I'm not going to play. I'll take my ball home and sulk. If 39MP means I wait another 6 months, then its a price worth paying.

Maybe I need to wait another 3 years, until the 1Ds mk 5 arrives. Again, if need be I can wait. I don't have to buy anything.

something tells me that if you can wait that long, you dont actually need that camera at all ^_^ lol. 39mpx is medium format territory from a couple of years ago. Lets be realistic in this thread. 29mpx sounds very nice and it'll have improved DR if to believe canon. I'll gladly take 2mpx less and have much better DR and IQ then only go for the mpx. also 32 vs 29.7 is just ... I don't even think if you re gonna notice the difference.


[Facebook® (external link)]
[imassmedia.pl (external link)]
[Flickr (external link)]
[My Blog (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamJL
Goldmember
Avatar
4,365 posts
Likes: 13
Joined May 2006
Location: 'Straya
     
Aug 23, 2010 20:04 |  #891

Lowner wrote in post #10773724 (external link)
As I've already stated, less than 32MP and I'm not going to play. I'll take my ball home and sulk. If 39MP means I wait another 6 months, then its a price worth paying.

You? Sulk? Never!! :p


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 65
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Aug 23, 2010 20:10 |  #892

Mastamarek wrote in post #10773757 (external link)
something tells me that if you can wait that long, you dont actually need that camera at all ^_^ lol. 39mpx is medium format territory from a couple of years ago. Lets be realistic in this thread. 29mpx sounds very nice and it'll have improved DR if to believe canon. I'll gladly take 2mpx less and have much better DR and IQ then only go for the mpx. also 32 vs 29.7 is just ... I don't even think if you re gonna notice the difference.

Plus one. You won't be able to tell the difference between 30 and 32 MP. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 65
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Aug 23, 2010 20:11 |  #893

snowboarder wrote in post #10773573 (external link)
I hope they really made an effort to improve the basic ISO dynamic range.
This is a 1Ds model, not usually used for ISO 10 million...
I want more range in ISO 100-400, that's all I use, ever.
Better shadows mostly. That's all really, 39MP sounds great to me.

I'll take 14 stops of DR anyday. :):cool:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RobDickinson
Goldmember
4,003 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 1052
Joined Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
     
Aug 23, 2010 20:18 as a reply to  @ post 9093803 |  #894

1Ds4 like the 1Ds3 will be optimised for low ISO quality and detail I'm sure.

~30mp, mebe they will cut the AA filter or make it realy weak.


www.HeroWorkshops.com (external link) - www.rjd.co.nz (external link) - www.zarphag.com (external link)
Gear: A7r, 6D, Irix 15mmf2.4 , canon 16-35f4L, Canon 24mm TS-E f3.5 mk2, Sigma 50mm art, 70-200f2.8L, 400L. Lee filters, iOptron IPano, Emotimo TB3, Markins, Feisol, Novoflex, Sirui. etc.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 65
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Aug 23, 2010 20:43 |  #895

RobDickinson wrote in post #10775085 (external link)
1Ds4 like the 1Ds3 will be optimised for low ISO quality and detail I'm sure.

~30mp, mebe they will cut the AA filter or make it realy weak.

I have a feeling Canon will remove the AA filter too. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snowboarder
Senior Member
400 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2008
     
Aug 23, 2010 21:05 |  #896

Mastamarek wrote in post #10773597 (external link)
39mpx is a 18+mpx jump from the older model. lol. thats almost a double ^_^ not gonna happen.

no, it's not "a double".
from 5616 x 3744 to 7650 x 5100 is not such a huge jump at these resolutions.
Bumping a few pixels on each side makes no sense. Even from the marketing pov.
What's the point of going from 5616 x 3744 to let's say 6500 x 4300? Barely noticeable...


You're welcome to visit my website: lenticulartravel.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RobDickinson
Goldmember
4,003 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 1052
Joined Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
     
Aug 23, 2010 21:13 as a reply to  @ post 9093803 |  #897

^ yep - remember this body will have to be the top of the line for canon for 3 years and its supposed to push the low end MF market too.

Canon went from 10mp (40D) to 18mp(7D) in what 2 years..


www.HeroWorkshops.com (external link) - www.rjd.co.nz (external link) - www.zarphag.com (external link)
Gear: A7r, 6D, Irix 15mmf2.4 , canon 16-35f4L, Canon 24mm TS-E f3.5 mk2, Sigma 50mm art, 70-200f2.8L, 400L. Lee filters, iOptron IPano, Emotimo TB3, Markins, Feisol, Novoflex, Sirui. etc.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 65
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Aug 23, 2010 21:26 |  #898

snowboarder wrote in post #10775376 (external link)
no, it's not "a double".
from 5616 x 3744 to 7650 x 5100 is not such a huge jump at these resolutions.
Bumping a few pixels on each side makes no sense. Even from the marketing pov.
What's the point of going from 5616 x 3744 to let's say 6500 x 4300? Barely noticeable...

If you want higher resolution go Digital MF instead. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 65
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Aug 23, 2010 21:26 |  #899

RobDickinson wrote in post #10775427 (external link)
^ yep - remember this body will have to be the top of the line for canon for 3 years and its supposed to push the low end MF market too.

Canon went from 10mp (40D) to 18mp(7D) in what 2 years..

We all know this doesn't last long in the digital game. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jorkata
Member
213 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Aug 23, 2010 21:44 |  #900

Mastamarek wrote in post #10773597 (external link)
39mpx is a 18+mpx jump from the older model. lol. thats almost a double ^_^ not gonna happen.

It's gonna happen for sure. 40+ mp is even more likely at this time.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

517,096 views & 0 likes for this thread, 254 members have posted to it.
Canon 1Ds mark 4
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is droneworx
786 guests, 151 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.