kevinll Member 46 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: The Netherlands More info | Aug 31, 2010 10:20 | #1 I found these ones on a Japanese website..  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Canon EOS 50D | Sigma 17-70mm OS HSM | EF 50mm 1.4 USM | EF 70-200mm 4L | Sigma 300mm f/4 APO HSM |Canon 430EX | Lowepro Fastpack 200 |Billingham Hadley Pro
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robertwsimpson Goldmember  2,471 posts Likes: 60 Joined Jun 2010 Location: West Palm Beach, FL USA More info | Aug 31, 2010 10:21 | #2 It looks HUGE in the tiny hands of an Asian.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
one more.. !  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Canon EOS 50D | Sigma 17-70mm OS HSM | EF 50mm 1.4 USM | EF 70-200mm 4L | Sigma 300mm f/4 APO HSM |Canon 430EX | Lowepro Fastpack 200 |Billingham Hadley Pro
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Headshotzx Goldmember  4,488 posts Likes: 133 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Singapore More info | Aug 31, 2010 10:23 | #4 |
KayakPhotos Goldmember  More info | Aug 31, 2010 10:28 | #5 |
jacobsen1 Cream of the Crop  9,629 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Mt View, RI More info | Aug 31, 2010 10:32 | #6 weird with the black first bit of the barrel... And I'm not sure if it's small hands playing into it but it looks quite thick (look how small the rear cap looks in the first shot)? My Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
another one  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Canon EOS 50D | Sigma 17-70mm OS HSM | EF 50mm 1.4 USM | EF 70-200mm 4L | Sigma 300mm f/4 APO HSM |Canon 430EX | Lowepro Fastpack 200 |Billingham Hadley Pro
LOG IN TO REPLY |
krb Cream of the Crop  8,818 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together More info | Aug 31, 2010 10:41 | #8 jacobsen1 wrote in post #10822977  weird with the black first bit of the barrel... They did that on the new super-teles too. I think I read something about issues with the white paint chipping in that area from attaching and removing the hood. -- Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,586 posts Likes: 26 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Aug 31, 2010 11:04 | #9 Seems kind of ugly to have a white lens this short. Doesn't fit with their tradition. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Makes you wonder if the lens hood will be able to be reveresed on the 70-300. R6 | M50 | 10-22 | 15-85is | Σ18-35 | Rokinon 14 2.8 | 85 1.8 | 55-250is STM | RF 24-105is L | 100-400 II L | Σ150-600 C | 1.4X III | 430ex |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jacobsen1 Cream of the Crop 9,629 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Mt View, RI More info | Aug 31, 2010 11:10 | #11 ct1co2 wrote in post #10823182 Makes you wonder if the lens hood will be able to be reveresed on the 70-300. canon loooooves hoods wider than they need to be so I'll say it should be able to be flipped. Look at the shot of it on the 5Dii, the hood threads are still out. My Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,586 posts Likes: 26 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Aug 31, 2010 11:14 | #12 What's with Canon's non-petal hood love, too? Would not be surprised to see this have an ugly straight round one like the 70-200 f4's. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrLA Senior Member  727 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2007 More info | Aug 31, 2010 11:15 | #13 looks like it's the previous 70-300 IS in new white shell. Body: Canon 5Dc, (Coming soon <<<6Dc, maybe I shall wait for 6Diic with TouchScreen!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop  18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Aug 31, 2010 11:17 | #14 I guess I'll ring in since the nay sayers of this lens are many. Looks good to me honestly. It doesn't look like the old one painted white to me. It looks fatter and shorter to me. Looking forward to this lens! Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
malla1962 Cream of the Crop  7,714 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk More info | Aug 31, 2010 11:57 | #15 themadman wrote in post #10823238 I guess I'll ring in since the nay sayers of this lens are many. Looks good to me honestly. It doesn't look like the old one painted white to me. It looks fatter and shorter to me. Looking forward to this lens! I think the only thing this has in common with the old one is the words 70-300.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is KMT916 857 guests, 263 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
I don't know if they are already posted here .
