Is there a difference between the 2 lenses as far a contrast (micro?) and color are concerned?
The more I shoot with my Zeiss 50 MP, the more I'm tuned in to the whole contrast / color thing 
Damn Zeiss! LOL
n1as Goldmember 2,330 posts Likes: 25 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Salem, OR More info | Sep 04, 2010 10:16 | #1 Is there a difference between the 2 lenses as far a contrast (micro?) and color are concerned? - Keith
LOG IN TO REPLY |
40dbaby Senior Member 516 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: socal More info | Sep 04, 2010 12:39 | #2 just sold the 24-105, but had both lenses briefly. the 24-70 had a little more contrast to my eyes, but I did not sell the 24-105 because of this. Only an untrained eye can appreciate the sharpness of a lens...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
malla1962 Cream of the Crop  7,714 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk More info | I have had 2 of each and found both colour and contrast to be better on the 24-70L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Trixster! Senior Member  716 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: York More info | Sep 04, 2010 12:47 | #4 My friend compared his 24/70 to his 24/105 and, in his opinion, the 70 produced better colour and contrast. 5D Mark II | EF 24-70 f/2.8 L | EF 70-200 f/4 L IS | EF 17-40 f/4 L | EF 50 f/1.8 | EF 1.4x II | Nissin Di866 II | flickriver
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word"  More info | Sep 04, 2010 12:59 | #5 n1as wrote in post #10849054  Is there a difference between the 2 lenses as far a contrast (micro?) and color are concerned? The more I shoot with my Zeiss 50 MP, the more I'm tuned in to the whole contrast / color thing Damn Zeiss! LOL no. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mj_photo Member 233 posts Joined Mar 2010 More info | Sep 04, 2010 14:24 | #6 It's too bad that Canon engineers doesn't involve in forums like this, I suppose that is funny to them to see these kind of questions (and answers especially
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 05, 2010 06:13 | #7 |
garyark Member 58 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Arkansas More info | Sep 05, 2010 19:12 | #8 I've used both and the 24-105 has terrific contrast and color saturation. The 24-70 design is getting a bit stale, and is not as sharp as other offerings, including the 24-105. Gary in Arkansas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
District_History_Fan Goldmember 2,286 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2008 More info | Sep 05, 2010 19:23 | #9 garyark wrote in post #10855798 I've used both and the 24-105 has terrific contrast and color saturation. The 24-70 design is getting a bit stale, and is not as sharp as other offerings, including the 24-105. It may be more difficult to get the 24-70 dialed in, but once it is, its plenty sharp. Mine is a razor at 2.8, but it took a trip back to Canon to get there. The 24-70 produces a polished look that has a refinement to it that is difficult to describe. It is truly a pro caliber lens. One weaknesses is the field curvature issue that shows up on the wide end when used on a FF camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Vinz_Evo 791 guests, 175 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
, as they probably use the same optic elements in both lenses.
