Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 01 Oct 2010 (Friday) 11:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Which macro: EF 100mm f/2.8L or 100mm/2.8

 
JayJay
Member
Avatar
75 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: France
     
Oct 01, 2010 11:16 |  #1

I'm trying to decide between which of the Canon macro 100mm lenses to choose.

The L is almost double the price but has IS and better quality. I want to use this lens to photograph flowers, insect life and jewellery, and as an added bonus, portraits. I'm really tempted to buy the non-L and put the rest towards a secondhand full frame body, but I would be interested to hear what others think.

JayJay


JayJay
Canon bodies: 50D, 5D
Canon lenses: EF 50mm f/1.4, EF L 17-40mm, EF 100mm macro, EF L 300 f4.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,805 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 395
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Oct 01, 2010 11:17 |  #2

If you're shooting portraits as well, you'll benefit from the IS on the L version. Otherwise, they're pretty similar - the L is a tiny bit sharper at f/2.8 and is weather-sealed, but that's just about it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Katalyst
Senior Member
Avatar
811 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: The Netherlands
     
Oct 01, 2010 11:21 |  #3

I had the same problem as you and I went for the non L version, as you said it saves almost half the money and if you're going to shoot portraits I'd use a tripod anyway!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shmoogy
Senior Member
505 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
     
Oct 01, 2010 12:41 |  #4

Katalyst wrote in post #11014642 (external link)
I had the same problem as you and I went for the non L version, as you said it saves almost half the money and if you're going to shoot portraits I'd use a tripod anyway!

I had the same ideas as you and I went for the L version.

Shooting portraits with a tripod is too much work if you're out and about, and being able to shoot at 1/30 shutter speed was worthwhile for me. The IS isn't all that great for macro purposes.

That being said, I don't really enjoy using it for portraiture, so I will toss in a consideration of 100 non-L for macro, and Rokinon 85 1.4 for portraiture, all for cheaper than the L version.


5D Mark II, 35L, 24 TS-E, 50 1.8
Canon 1000D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,884 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Oct 01, 2010 12:46 |  #5

Since I use my 70-200 2.8 IS II for portraits I never use my 100 macro for that purpose. I have owned both the 100mm macros, and ended up keeping my non-L. I didnt like the Hybrid IS system in the 100L. Sounded clunky and I didnt like how it flops around a bit inside the lens barrel when the lens is unmounted. I didnt like the build quality, IMO is was not up to L standards. As mentioned ealier, IS doesnt really help with macro photography if you use a flash, which I always do. I didnt like that I had to buy an additional $40 adapter to use the 100L with my MT-24EX flash. I didnt like that the 100L was not a standard filter size like 58mm or 77mm which ALL my other lenses match. And lastly, since the IQ for macro is very much the same, there was no gain in IQ from the 100L. Needless to say I returned the 100L and kept my non-L.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
17,826 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 1668
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Oct 01, 2010 12:47 |  #6

buy the non L, and with your savings buy a flash...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,884 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Oct 01, 2010 12:48 |  #7

DreDaze wrote in post #11015156 (external link)
buy the non L, and with your savings buy a flash...

+1 to that!


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjx
Goldmember
Avatar
2,667 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Santa Clara, California
     
Oct 01, 2010 15:47 as a reply to  @ ben_r_'s post |  #8

Yeah, you need the flash for bug macro, and other types of macro.

You could also get the 85 1.8 for portraits, and a Kenko extension tube set for macro.

Tamron makes a 60mm f/2 macro which looks pretty nice and is a good portrait length on crop sensors.

Tamron also makes the nice 90mm 2.8 macro. Don't forget Sigma's macro offerings.

I purchased the non L 100mm macro since imo the IS is a waste of money for most macro purposes.


"It doesn't matter what camera you have if your photography has nothing worthwhile to say"
“Photos are everywhere. You just have to know how to look.”

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JayJay
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
75 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: France
     
Oct 02, 2010 06:20 |  #9

many thanks for so much considered advice. I've made my decision now, the Non L it will be, plus the flash. merci!


JayJay
Canon bodies: 50D, 5D
Canon lenses: EF 50mm f/1.4, EF L 17-40mm, EF 100mm macro, EF L 300 f4.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,022 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Oct 02, 2010 09:54 |  #10

I never pulled the trigger on the 100 macro until L and IS. Better IQ, IS to help when I do macro w/o a tripod (which is most of the time), and I appreciate the lighter weight.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,484 views & 0 likes for this thread
Which macro: EF 100mm f/2.8L or 100mm/2.8
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is brotherbear86
775 guests, 292 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.