Thinking about jumping over to Canon for your inexpensive prime lenses. Don't think there is any difference in camera brands but the Canon lenses are way less costly than the Nikon. I literally can't afford to shoot Nikon any more.
So, I'm thinking about either 2 MKII's or 1 MKIII and maybe a 40d as a backup camera. I currently am shooting D1 football and HS sports but when the season ends, I'm done with that. I know the MKIII has the microfocus adjustment and that's probably a pretty big deal.
Your thoughts are welcome.
Currently have in Nikon:
D700, D300, D2h, 28-70(borrowed), Sigma 70-200, 35-70 (broken), 50 1.4 and 300 2.8.
I hate zooms but can't afford the new primes that Nikon has introduced. I can sell all my Nikon stuff and have enough for a couple of good cameras, sack full of glass and money left over for some more lighting.
I hate these tell me what I should do threads but...