Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 21 Oct 2010 (Thursday) 01:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Losing sleep over lenses...too tough of a decision

 
joonavar
Hatchling
Avatar
5 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Sydney, NSW
     
Oct 21, 2010 01:09 |  #1

I would love a little help if possible.
I am aiming to get into portrait work, but not just of single people, but of couples and new couples with babies.
I am utterly stuck as to what lens to choose though, and I am planning on adding a couple of lenses to my collection.

My current setup: Canon 450D, twin kit lens (the standard of which I am sure you are all familiar with), Tamron 60mm f/2.0 macro.
Now, I've used the Tamron for candid portrait shots and it's fabulous...however, the speed of focusing is slow due to it being primarily a macro - I love the DOF it gives me however.

My shortlist is:
Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM
Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM
Canon 70-200 f/2.8L USM

I'm finding it really hard deciding what to go for...or what combination of lenses would be best for me.
I want something that would be good for both indoors and outdoors in the countryside, etc...

would love any constructive feedback.

please be mindful of the crop factor when suggesting which lens I should go for.

thank you!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Maureen ­ Souza
Ms. MODERATOR     Something Spectacular!
Avatar
34,047 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 8751
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Central California
     
Oct 21, 2010 01:13 |  #2

My favorite portrait lenses are the 85/1.2 and the 135mm. That is what I use for all my wedding portraits. The rest of the time I am shooting with my 24-70.


Life is hard...but I just take it one photograph at a time.

5DMK4
7DMK2
Canon Lenses: 50/1.4, 135/2.0, 100-400mm II, 24-70/2.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Maureen ­ Souza
Ms. MODERATOR     Something Spectacular!
Avatar
34,047 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 8751
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Central California
     
Oct 21, 2010 01:15 |  #3

PS.... there are lots of great lenses out there. Buy one and get some sleep. The magic is in your touch, not the gear. I have seen some awesome photos from the lower priced lenses.


Life is hard...but I just take it one photograph at a time.

5DMK4
7DMK2
Canon Lenses: 50/1.4, 135/2.0, 100-400mm II, 24-70/2.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kouasupra
Goldmember
2,800 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 819
Joined May 2008
Location: Fresno/Clovis, CA
     
Oct 21, 2010 01:22 as a reply to  @ Maureen Souza's post |  #4

I've owned all those lens. Here's my input...

50 1.4 = body shots and great with crop body. crop body = 80mm

85 1.8 = head shot, portrait, and great DoF. With crop body your looking at: 136mm

70-200 2.8 is a great lens overall. Very versatile with great bokeh.

Depends on what your shooting and your style is. Good luck and get some sleep.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joonavar
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Avatar
5 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Sydney, NSW
     
Oct 21, 2010 01:50 |  #5

I've been told time and time again that I have a great eye, so I think I'm not far from that magic touch, but making a decision on something I'm not so hot at...especially when it involves pricey items!
I'm also aiming at making a decision soon as I'm planning on purchasing from B & H Photo whilst the Aussie dollar is so good..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roosterslayer
Senior Member
994 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: SF, CA
     
Oct 21, 2010 01:58 |  #6

i used the 50 1.4 and it was my favorite lens. highly recommend it and it goes for good price if you're into the used market. i've heard good things about the 85 as well but since you're using cropped idk how you would feel about the long range. the 70-200 is the best L imo. the range is again not as effective on a crop unless you really need the focal length.

so in the end i think the 50 would be best since its affordable and faster than your tamron.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_TX
Goldmember
1,471 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Texas
     
Oct 21, 2010 11:28 as a reply to  @ roosterslayer's post |  #7

Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM & Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM would be my first two choices for portrait work.

On a crop-body, I think the 70-200 would not be wide enough for the types of setups you described (unless you have a large working area and can move back). However, even moving back will change the image due to zooms adding a "compressed" look. I would definitely hold off on the 70-200 until you have a couple other lenses or have a specific need for this lens.

Both of those above mentioned lenses around f2-2.8 are very sharp and focus is quick with USM.

On a crop-body, a 35-50-85 lens setup would produce the same FOV as the prime lens trifecta for full-frame bodies (50-85-135).


5D4 | 5D3 | 16-35 f4 IS | 24-105 f4 IS | 70-200 f4 IS | 100-400 II | Sigma 20 f/1.4 ART | Sigma 35 f/1.4 ART | EF 1.4x III | EF 2x II | 430EX II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
booja
Goldmember
1,638 posts
Likes: 103
Joined Jan 2008
Location: houston, tx
     
Oct 21, 2010 12:03 |  #8

Buy try and sell. That's what I did. Lenses keep their value so well and there is always a demand as long as you get a good lens.

I've been through about 30+ lenses before I decided on my 5 I have now




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MNUplander
Goldmember
2,534 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 134
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
     
Oct 21, 2010 12:14 |  #9

I wouldnt lose so much sleep over it.

Even 50mm might be pretty tight on a crop if you are trying to do portraits of families together. Might want to consider the Sigma 30 1.4 or Canon 28 1.8 for that and use your 60 for tighter or candid shots...

Out of the ones youve chosen for your uses, Id go with the 50.


Lake Superior and North Shore Landscape Photography (external link)
Buy & Sell Feedback
R6, EF16-35 f4 IS, EF 50 1.2, EF 100 2.8 IS Macro, 150-600C

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
woehlerking
Senior Member
Avatar
456 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Canada EH!
     
Oct 21, 2010 12:20 as a reply to  @ MNUplander's post |  #10

85 1.8
Great lens for the money.


gear
https://photography-on-the.net …p=10063848&post​count=2316

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dengar
Senior Member
987 posts
Joined Mar 2005
     
Oct 22, 2010 14:13 |  #11

For couples with kids I would definitely go with some form of zoom like the 24-70 or Tamron 28-75 if you want to save money.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Oct 22, 2010 14:24 |  #12

Just get everything on my gear list and then you can sleep. Oh, I have 3 new lenses on the way.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaftmaster
Goldmember
Avatar
1,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: above 5000 feet
     
Oct 22, 2010 14:33 |  #13

If you can afford the 70-200mm f/2.8 zoom, then you can afford to buy the 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, and the Sigma 30 f/1.4. Those three primes are a good set for a crop camera. The 50mm is probably the weakest of the three but still gives good results.


Paul

Gear -- Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CountryBoy
"Tired of Goldmember label"
Avatar
5,168 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Okie
     
Oct 22, 2010 14:37 |  #14

gasrocks wrote in post #11146153 (external link)
Just get everything on my gear list and then you can sleep. Oh, I have 3 new lenses on the way.

Would love to have that 300-800m :lol: !


Hi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Oct 22, 2010 15:04 |  #15

Your 60mm is the perfect focal length for portraits on a 1.6x crop. All you need now is something for wider work and group shots, so I would recommend the Sigma 30mm f1.4.

I've got a longer f2.8 zoom and had the 85mm f1.8. You really don't need to go past 70mm on a crop camera for portraits. You can, but it is too long more often than it is a necessity. From your list, the only one I would recommend for your work is the 50mm, and honestly it is not going to give you much over the 60mm you already own.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,304 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Losing sleep over lenses...too tough of a decision
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is monmon
674 guests, 183 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.