Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 14 Oct 2010 (Thursday) 10:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Magnesium vs. Plastic Body Construction

 
Yusef
Senior Member
677 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Oct 25, 2010 14:48 |  #121

Plastic degrades over time becoming brittle and weak.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Oct 25, 2010 15:14 |  #122

Yusef wrote in post #11162423 (external link)
Plastic degrades over time becoming brittle and weak.

How many lifetimes are we talking before a 550D turns brittle?


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,351 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1356
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Oct 25, 2010 15:22 |  #123

tkbslc wrote in post #11162333 (external link)
I don't see how that is a knock to modern camera construction. If put a small hammer in my camera bag ($5 at the hardware store) then I can also hammer in a nail and then take a picture with my 30D. Why would I want to hammer in a nail with a camera when a $5 tool does the job better?

I was agreeing with the point I'd quoted that the electronics in a DSLR probably can't stand impact that would leave the case undamaged...which mechanical cameras could do.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Oct 25, 2010 15:34 |  #124

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #11161095 (external link)
Plastics may be better in a lot of cases, but it is certainly more affordable and easier to cast.
I think the largest part of the reason Canon could afford to drop the launch price of the 60D was this one change. Magnesium alloys are far more costly than the plastics, whether it is superior or inferior,. it is more costly to produce.

Bingo! We have a winner!

But back to the original question:

ABS plastic is much more resistant to impact damage than magnesium. Canon says so. And if we look at a dozen or so threads in this forum on the lines of "Waaah! I dropped my camera!" we'll see pictures of magnesium bodied cameras badly cracked. I can't find it right now but there was a good picture of a cracked 5D a while back.

Magnesium is light and brittle. ABS is heavier and resilient.

They make motorcycle helmets from ABS plastic. They never make them from magnesium.

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave ­ kadolph
"Fix the cigarette lighter"
Avatar
6,140 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Mar 2007
Location: West Michigan--166.33 miles to the Cook County courthouse
     
Oct 25, 2010 16:18 |  #125

tkbslc wrote in post #11161993 (external link)
Somehow, carbon fiber is accepted as high quality, but other composites are considered "cheap", regardless of actual properties.

This one I don't understand either--as carbon fiber shatters on impact :confused:


Middle age is when you can finally afford the things that a young man could truly enjoy.
Tools of the trade

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tharmsen
Goldmember
Avatar
1,737 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NW Indiana
     
Oct 25, 2010 16:35 |  #126

Yusef wrote in post #11162423 (external link)
Plastic degrades over time becoming brittle and weak.

Modern plastics are exceptionally durable.

It's not 1970 anymore. :)




Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tharmsen
Goldmember
Avatar
1,737 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NW Indiana
     
Oct 25, 2010 16:37 |  #127

If you question the durability of plastic bodied cameras, I suggest you watch these videos.

http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=D1tTBncIsm8 (external link)
http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=FWzsXeXCwuc (external link)




Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Oct 25, 2010 18:09 |  #128

tharmsen wrote in post #11163134 (external link)
If you question the durability of plastic bodied cameras, I suggest you watch these videos.

http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=D1tTBncIsm8 (external link)
http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=FWzsXeXCwuc (external link)

:lol::lol::lol:

Fun videos!


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
enrigonz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,637 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Miami, FL
     
Oct 25, 2010 18:49 |  #129

tharmsen wrote in post #11163125 (external link)
Modern plastics are exceptionally durable.

It's not 1970 anymore. :)

It's a very good remark, "not 1970 anymore", it's hard for some that grew up in the 60s or 70s to think high strength plastic is better than metal of any kind.

I'm in the civil engineering field, we use HDPE (High-density polyethylene) which is a is a polyethylene thermoplastic made from petroleum, we also use a very high strength grade of PVC pipe which is also another type of plastic. Yeah I know is not the same but this is an industry where everything was either ductile iron pipe or some other high strength concrete pipe design for very high pressures in either water mains or force mains. It took people a very long time to realize that plastic was better for many applications plus it made it easier to handle and in some cases such as with PVC much cheaper to build.

It's hard fact to swallow for some but high strength plastic is just as good as many metals out there. I personally never had a problem with it, and I don't think magnesium is any better than a good high grade, high strength plastic.


Canon Stuff :) |Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
biggusdickus
Member
38 posts
Joined Feb 2010
     
Oct 25, 2010 19:04 |  #130

I don't think plastic vs. magnesium really matters. Ergonomically, I found my old Pentax K10D to be equal to or better than the mg-body 40D. It had full weather-sealing and was leagues ahead of the Rebel Xti, Xsi series.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Destractions
Senior Member
Avatar
391 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Victoria BC
     
Oct 25, 2010 19:45 |  #131

Anyone else notice the disappearance of the OP?


The unholy trinity:
EF 70-200mm F4 \ & Tamron-F 2X TC
EFS 17-55mm f/2.8
EFS 10-22mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kmyers1us
Junior Member
Avatar
23 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Oct 25, 2010 19:57 |  #132

Destractions wrote in post #11164146 (external link)
Anyone else notice the disappearance of the OP?

It seems OP started a forest fire. Fun to debate the issue though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamJL
Goldmember
Avatar
4,365 posts
Likes: 13
Joined May 2006
Location: 'Straya
     
Oct 25, 2010 20:12 |  #133

Very interesting debate indeed.

I agree with whoever mentioned earlier about there being a psychological edge to magnesium. As someone above mentioned, growing up, we never think of plastic as being strong. Most plastics people encounter in their day to day lives that we are aware of (big distinction between knowing something's plastic and not knowing!) wouldn't inspire confidence in protecting a camera body. Plastics are so varied in their application, so it's hard to think of something that you chuck a couple of oranges in at the supermarket is related to something used on ultra high tech machines.

I don't doubt that plastics have come a long way in a short time. Magnesium alloys to me feels better in my hands. That's not a very scientific point I know, but a lot of people make decisions on what feels right rather than what is technically superior.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Oct 25, 2010 20:25 |  #134

Destractions wrote in post #11164146 (external link)
Anyone else notice the disappearance of the OP?

Ummmm, he was "disappeared". Best not to speak of it further. Shudder.

:shock:


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Oct 25, 2010 20:38 as a reply to  @ number six's post |  #135

AdamJL wrote in post #11164326 (external link)
I don't doubt that plastics have come a long way in a short time. Magnesium alloys to me feels better in my hands. That's not a very scientific point I know, but a lot of people make decisions on what feels right rather than what is technically superior.

Even the feel is changing.

I'm an amateur machinist, just as I'm an amateur photographer. (Except that I've actually made money with my lathe, milling machine and welder.) Amateur because I have no interest in destroying my love for a hobby by trying to turn it into a business.

A few years ago I had occasion to machine some pieces from Delrin stock. (Generic name is Acetal.)

Amazing stuff. Machines beautifully to a nice finish on the first pass. Easy to achieve tolerances of .001". Stable stuff, too. Untouched by most nasty chemicals.

As enrigonz observes, HDPE is also a very useful material. Excellent for making patterns, for example - you can cut and machine it to precise dimensions with hand tools.

And, of course, PVC is ubiquitous these days in piping. The high-strength stuff is available too, and cheap. No problems with rust!

(Yeah, I'm a gearhead.)

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

57,068 views & 0 likes for this thread, 98 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Magnesium vs. Plastic Body Construction
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SierraLima
1203 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.