Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 13 Dec 2010 (Monday) 18:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Exposure and Contrast

Adam ­ Jones
1,649 posts
Likes: 60
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Davis, CA
Dec 13, 2010 18:57 |  #1

Hello Critique Corner! It's been awhile, but here I am, humbly crawling back to you for more of your sage advice. :oops::lol:

My first question the first photo too flat? I do my work on a very contrasty IPS monitor and my photos always lose a little pop when I view them on a TN screen.

Secondly, which of these photos looks like the more properly exposed one to you? Which is more pleasing to the eye, and are the two necessarily always going to be the same? I feel like I've been struggling to find that second-nature feel for perfect exposure and contrast for awhile now. Your thoughts and opinions are always appreciated!



Anthony | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link) | www.purplecollarphoto.​com (external link)

1,216 posts
Likes: 148
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Dec 13, 2010 19:10 |  #2

Both look fine to me. The second looks a little my saturated. But remember, if you learn the "selection" tool in your photo software, you can make things "pop" by only saturating some parts, and DEsaturating others... as I did with your Cutie below.

my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Dec 13, 2010 19:16 as a reply to  @ kjonnnn's post |  #3

First one looks better to me. Better contrast/color and more detail in the little guy's chest. The second one looks a bit overexposed for a final image.

- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
3,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Dec 13, 2010 19:24 |  #4

To my eye / monitor / squishbrain, the first looks best and is definitely sufficiently contrasty as to, as you say, 'pop.' The second seems just a smidgen overexposed though not by much.

christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.com (external link)| Blog (external link)

Senior Member
514 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Rails of the Lehigh Valley Line and Trenton Sub
Dec 13, 2010 19:35 |  #5

Agree that the 1st is the best. The 2nd is just a little too hot.

FLICKR (external link)​ (external link)

50D | OM-2n | OM-4T | Hasselblad 500C/M | Yashica GSN | Yashica A | NO2. Brownie Model F

1,557 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: WNY
Dec 17, 2010 06:16 |  #6

They also appear oversharpened to me.

gear list

sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,277 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Exposure and Contrast
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
3563 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.