Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 18 Nov 2010 (Thursday) 23:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

my 70 - 200 2.8 L IS USM II fell off my 5D

 
mchova
Member
153 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Nov 28, 2010 20:32 |  #91

Thanks for the heads-up! I tried this out on my 5D and I can get ALL my lenses off my 5D by barely pressing the release button (seems to be less than 1/3 of the way). Can you let me know what they fixed on the body? It has never happened to me under normal conditions, but I could see how it would very easily. On my 50D, I have to completely press the release button for the same lenses to be in a situation where they would fall off. Mine was also in the shop recently, and I asked Canon to go over it…


5D III | 50D | Canon 15 | 16-35 L | TS-E 17 L | 24-70 L | Canon 50 L | Canon 85 1.4 | Sigma 50-500 | 70-200 2.8 IS L | 1.4 & 2x Extender II | 430 EXII | Pixma Pro9000 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GCM
Member
Avatar
89 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Kilmarnock, Scotland
     
Dec 14, 2010 13:40 as a reply to  @ mchova's post |  #92

My wife and I have 2 7D's with the same problem the lens loosen off, it does not matter whether it is the 300mm, 500mm or teleconverter that is fitted to the body, it has also happened with a sigma lens. It has never happened with any other Canon cameras we have had only the 7D's. Canon DO have a problem, but will never admit it, especially in the U.K.


Gordon

Canon 40D, Canon 18-55 kit lens, Sigma 18-200 OS, EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

http://www.mccalls.me.​uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,630 posts
Gallery: 1863 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 9441
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
     
Dec 14, 2010 13:45 |  #93

GCM wrote in post #11451738 (external link)
My wife and I have 2 7D's with the same problem the lens loosen off, it does not matter whether it is the 300mm, 500mm or teleconverter that is fitted to the body, it has also happened with a sigma lens. It has never happened with any other Canon cameras we have had only the 7D's. Canon DO have a problem, but will never admit it, especially in the U.K.

I'm assuming you've contacted Canon U.K. about your issues and they somehow refused to examine/service/repair​?

Because I would have to think your cameras are still under warranty and if they are, it's best to take care of the problem now, than to have a lens separation catastrophe.

BUT if you haven't attempted to send the cameras in to Canon for service/repair... then that would be quite a bold statement to say that Canon "will never admit it" when you didn't even address it to them.


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link) | Instagram (external link) | YouTube (external link)
My Reviews | "The Mighty One" (external link) | "EF 85mm f/1.4 L IS Review" (external link)
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Poe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,956 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Modesto, CA
     
Dec 14, 2010 19:24 |  #94

Now that I have read this thread, I'm keeping a tight grip on my new baby!



Nikon D750, D7200 | Nikon-Nikkor 14-24G, 60G Micro, 70-300E | SIGMA 35A, 105 OS, 24-105 OS | ZEISS Distagon 2.0/25 Classic, Apo-Distagon 1.4/55 Otus, Apo-Planar 1.4/85 Otus, Makro-Planar 2/100 Classic, Apo-Sonnar 2/135 Classic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nitehawk55
Senior Member
856 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Ontario Canada
     
Dec 14, 2010 20:39 as a reply to  @ Poe's post |  #95

I'll keep an eye on my 7D but I check that it's locked each time I put on a lens and I can't understand how they could come loose as my release button is pretty stiff .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,630 posts
Gallery: 1863 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 9441
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
     
Dec 14, 2010 22:59 |  #96

nitehawk55 wrote in post #11453880 (external link)
I'll keep an eye on my 7D but I check that it's locked each time I put on a lens and I can't understand how they could come loose as my release button is pretty stiff .

Apparently according to less than a handful of posters in this thread, it's possible there's some variation that are considered within the tolerances of factory specs.

I personally can't see that happening on mine because the release button needs to be fully pressed before the lock disengages.


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link) | Instagram (external link) | YouTube (external link)
My Reviews | "The Mighty One" (external link) | "EF 85mm f/1.4 L IS Review" (external link)
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MKII
Goldmember
Avatar
1,502 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: greece
     
Dec 16, 2010 14:31 |  #97

there is no way that a lens will fall of the camera without be a users fault...ive tested the lenses so many times by pulling them ,pushing them ect ect...it was a users fault or its just a misleading rumor to blame canon for something that doesnt really exist..!!!


Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.co​m/JohnDomPhotography (external link)
http://JohnDomPhoto.Co​m (external link) - http://JohnDomWeddings​.Com (external link)

GEAR LIST


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anders ­ Östberg
Goldmember
Avatar
3,395 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Sweden
     
Dec 16, 2010 14:46 |  #98

Even though I basically think it's most likely user error or an accident I don't agree with your "there's no way" opinion ...
... everything mechanical can fail or have iffy functionality
https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=11316225&po​stcount=25


Anders Östberg - Mostly Canon gear - My photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MKII
Goldmember
Avatar
1,502 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: greece
     
Dec 16, 2010 14:58 |  #99

Come on my friend...you know its so damn hard to happen...you must push the release button to unlock the lens...Dont mention the entenders...it may be easier there...but in the camera-lens connection...no way..!!!


Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.co​m/JohnDomPhotography (external link)
http://JohnDomPhoto.Co​m (external link) - http://JohnDomWeddings​.Com (external link)

GEAR LIST


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anders ­ Östberg
Goldmember
Avatar
3,395 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Sweden
     
Dec 16, 2010 15:08 |  #100

Why would a similar locking mechanism in the camera be 100% fool-proof if it can fail in a TC?
Some of them are bound to fail or be unreliable, even if it's a very small percentage.


Anders Östberg - Mostly Canon gear - My photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
big_g
Goldmember
1,064 posts
Gallery: 418 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2221
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Lincolnshire UK, Live in Scotland
     
Dec 16, 2010 15:42 as a reply to  @ Anders Östberg's post |  #101

This is a really interesting thread.

Firstly, even if the 5D was at fault, canon would probably not be obliged to fix the lens as the camera is out of warranty. They cannot be responsible for mounting extremely expensive new equipment on an old, potentially defective body.

Second, as loads of other people have pointed out, it this was a real problem it would be all over the forum. The Sigma focussing issue turn up most days, soft 24 70s are reported more than weekly, 7D focussing problems threads are very popular and these are not massive issues (or probably not even real "issues"). Given that there are tens (hundreds?) of thousand of 5Ds out there i'm sure we would have heard about this a lot more.

Third, when you are a left hander, as I am, it is pretty much impossible to hold the camera any different to a right hander as the button positions are fixed. When you hold a pen it doesn't matter where you place our fingers as long as you are comfortable. The strange contortions are to stop the ink smudging. When there are fixed contact points the method of operation is pretty much fixed.

Finally, whilst I do feel sorry for the OP, she let herself down a bit with the sexist rubbish. I hadn't paid any attention to her gender as I am sure most people hadn't. No one had said she was stupid or incompetent just that the problem may have been user error. We all make errors no matter how experienced or skilful we are. I make errors every day and just accept they were errors no matter how expensive. At the end of the day it was not an incredibly expensive repair and a good lesson learnt for all of us


Very lucky to have a lot of nice toys :)
Flickr Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Poe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,956 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Modesto, CA
     
Dec 16, 2010 16:06 |  #102

big_g wrote in post #11464634 (external link)
This is a really interesting thread.

Firstly, even if the 5D was at fault, canon would probably not be obliged to fix the lens as the camera is out of warranty. They cannot be responsible for mounting extremely expensive new equipment on an old, potentially defective body.

Second, as loads of other people have pointed out, it this was a real problem it would be all over the forum. The Sigma focussing issue turn up most days, soft 24 70s are reported more than weekly, 7D focussing problems threads are very popular and these are not massive issues (or probably not even real "issues"). Given that there are tens (hundreds?) of thousand of 5Ds out there i'm sure we would have heard about this a lot more.

Third, when you are a left hander, as I am, it is pretty much impossible to hold the camera any different to a right hander as the button positions are fixed. When you hold a pen it doesn't matter where you place our fingers as long as you are comfortable. The strange contortions are to stop the ink smudging. When there are fixed contact points the method of operation is pretty much fixed.

Finally, whilst I do feel sorry for the OP, she let herself down a bit with the sexist rubbish. I hadn't paid any attention to her gender as I am sure most people hadn't. No one had said she was stupid or incompetent just that the problem may have been user error. We all make errors no matter how experienced or skilful we are. I make errors every day and just accept they were errors no matter how expensive. At the end of the day it was not an incredibly expensive repair and a good lesson learnt for all of us

Well said. +1e12



Nikon D750, D7200 | Nikon-Nikkor 14-24G, 60G Micro, 70-300E | SIGMA 35A, 105 OS, 24-105 OS | ZEISS Distagon 2.0/25 Classic, Apo-Distagon 1.4/55 Otus, Apo-Planar 1.4/85 Otus, Makro-Planar 2/100 Classic, Apo-Sonnar 2/135 Classic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
big_g
Goldmember
1,064 posts
Gallery: 418 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2221
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Lincolnshire UK, Live in Scotland
     
Dec 16, 2010 16:14 as a reply to  @ Poe's post |  #103

Thanks ;)


Very lucky to have a lot of nice toys :)
Flickr Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MKII
Goldmember
Avatar
1,502 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: greece
     
Dec 17, 2010 03:19 |  #104

big_g wrote in post #11464634 (external link)
This is a really interesting thread.

Firstly, even if the 5D was at fault, canon would probably not be obliged to fix the lens as the camera is out of warranty. They cannot be responsible for mounting extremely expensive new equipment on an old, potentially defective body.

Second, as loads of other people have pointed out, it this was a real problem it would be all over the forum. The Sigma focussing issue turn up most days, soft 24 70s are reported more than weekly, 7D focussing problems threads are very popular and these are not massive issues (or probably not even real "issues"). Given that there are tens (hundreds?) of thousand of 5Ds out there i'm sure we would have heard about this a lot more.

Third, when you are a left hander, as I am, it is pretty much impossible to hold the camera any different to a right hander as the button positions are fixed. When you hold a pen it doesn't matter where you place our fingers as long as you are comfortable. The strange contortions are to stop the ink smudging. When there are fixed contact points the method of operation is pretty much fixed.

Finally, whilst I do feel sorry for the OP, she let herself down a bit with the sexist rubbish. I hadn't paid any attention to her gender as I am sure most people hadn't. No one had said she was stupid or incompetent just that the problem may have been user error. We all make errors no matter how experienced or skilful we are. I make errors every day and just accept they were errors no matter how expensive. At the end of the day it was not an incredibly expensive repair and a good lesson learnt for all of us

That was my point too..well said my friend..!!!


Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.co​m/JohnDomPhotography (external link)
http://JohnDomPhoto.Co​m (external link) - http://JohnDomWeddings​.Com (external link)

GEAR LIST


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,316 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 415
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Dec 17, 2010 08:15 |  #105

guitarfish wrote in post #11327935 (external link)
"THERE'S NO WRONG WAY TO HOLD IT."
QUOTED IMAGE

Similar problem..............

IMAGE: http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y17/msowsun/photo%20stuff/Photo2/IMG_5671_1024.jpg


IMAGE: http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y17/msowsun/photo%20stuff/Photo2/IMG_5671crop2.jpg

Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

47,195 views & 12 likes for this thread, 83 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
my 70 - 200 2.8 L IS USM II fell off my 5D
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Grasz
1087 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.