It's all Walmarts fault!
HastyPhoto Senior Member 953 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Philly Burbs More info | Dec 22, 2010 08:03 | #31 It's all Walmarts fault! 60D | EFS 17-55 2.8 IS | Rode VideoMic Pro | Manfrotto 190XPROB
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fnothaft Senior Member 575 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Oakland, CA More info | Subscribing! Keep the good info coming... Body: Canon EOS 5D Mark 2 • Lenses: Bower 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC, Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II, Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, Lensbaby 2.0, Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, Canon EF 135 f/2L USM • Lighting: Canon Speedlite 580EX II • Support: Dolica CX620B104
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikekelley "Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!" 7,317 posts Likes: 16 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Dec 22, 2010 08:40 | #33 re: not obsessing over gear Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 22, 2010 09:16 | #34 I myself am working on a rough business plan. I'm trying to lay out as much of the details as I can and still ease into it. I plan to continue to read up, continue my research, and ask lots of questions. I'm learning by the hour more and more just how dynamic the photography business is. It's truly like selling no other service or product. If I were starting a restaurant, carpet cleaning service, plumbing business, etc. I could very easily do some good market area research, ie. locations, demographics, and pricing structures. It's truly amazing how dynamic it is, but that coupled with the lower risk/love of the hobby is what is drawing me to start a business. http://www.jakegregoirephotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Peacefield Goldmember 4,023 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2008 Location: NJ More info | Dec 22, 2010 09:30 | #35 I had (and still have) a business plan. Not a formal written one, but I've always had a clear picture of how I'd balance costs against revenues, I knew who my target client was, how to price myself and offer products for them, etc. Robert Wayne Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scarlettjax Member 47 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Jacksonville, FL More info | Dec 22, 2010 09:52 | #36 You do have to build up a certain amount of redundancy; for example, having at least one back up body and being prepared to use it . The first year of my part-time business life (I did keep the day job) some of the jobs I did placed more stress on my gear than I anticipated, and mechanical issues cropped up at the most inopportune times. Get a Canon Professional Services membership at the highest level you can afford.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | Dec 22, 2010 10:05 | #37 mikekelley wrote in post #11496448 re: not obsessing over gear i would say that instead of wasting time flipping lenses 8x/year, I'd just buy the gear I need for the job I want to do and cut the extra fluff out. pros know what they need to get the job done....and it's not 4 bodies and 16 lenses. Well said and totally agree. Most of my friends that are also in the biz have gear that works for what they do and works with their vision. I've always believed its better to have the right stuff than all the stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | Heres some things Adams had to say 60 years ago and they are just as true today. Scanned this to lazy to type it. The more you learn about your vision the more in tune with you get with the equipment you need and you find that you don't need everything. Most of us usually don't need to cover every focal length. If you really learn to see in the true sense of the word as it pertains photography you start finding things that work better for that vision no mater what that may be and you tend to weed out the stuff thats not necessary. You will find that if you don't buy everything you have more money to buy what fits best for your vision. What limits a photographer is a lack of vision and in many cases has little to do with equipment as long as he has equipment that matches the way he sees.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Dec 22, 2010 11:18 | #39 airfrogusmc wrote in post #11497178 Most of us usually don't need to cover every focal length. No doubt. I'm at the point where I can and will easily do a 2-3 hour portrait session with nothing but the 135. It's beautifully liberating. The key is in moving my fat American ass. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | Dec 22, 2010 11:27 | #40 cdifoto wrote in post #11497207 No doubt. I'm at the point where I can and will easily do a 2-3 hour portrait session with nothing but the 135. It's beautifully liberating. The key is in moving my fat American ass.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Dec 22, 2010 11:30 | #41 Bahahaha! Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | Dec 22, 2010 11:38 | #42 cdifoto wrote in post #11497259 Bahahaha! ![]() I like my standard zoom but it's more of an events thing, and I'm halfway tempted to sell it for a 35. Before you give it up make sure that you can live without it. Like I said primes really fit my vision and what I do. Sometimes, like maybe in your case a zoom is really more in line with your vision. I would borrow or rent one before making such a commitment but I could probably shoot an entire candid job on a FF camera with a 35mm lens if I had to and it would look great. But thats me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Dec 22, 2010 11:40 | #43 airfrogusmc wrote in post #11497297 Before you give it up make sure that you can live without it. Like I said primes really fit my vision and what I do. Sometimes, like maybe in your case a zoom is really more in line with your vision. I would borrow or rent one before making such a commitment but I could probably shoot an entire candid job on a FF camera with a 35mm lens if I had to and it would look great. But thats me. Yeah I'm not fully convinced that I could. For the portraiture I do, there's no real question that I could definitely use it in lieu of the 24-70. I'm not doing weddings on my own anymore but I do second with a friend quite a bit. I plan to rent one for our next gig. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MP4/8 Senior Member 689 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Mississauga ON, Canada More info | Dec 22, 2010 12:34 | #44 Permanent bancdifoto wrote in post #11495956 Translation: "I'll crap on your business aspirations/market/abilities/approach with a doom-and-gloom attitude...from the sidelines...kind of like the soccer dad who tries to coach from the bleachers yet has no experience of his own." Translation: Canon T2i ** EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 ** EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS ** EF 50mm f/1.8 II ** EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro ** Lensbaby ** Canon S5 IS P/S camera
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Dec 22, 2010 12:35 | #45 MP4/8 wrote in post #11497560 Translation: "I'm idealistic, stop being realistic. I already know those things you're saying. I just don't wanna be reminded of the truth." . Unlike you, I'm actually running a photography business. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1239 guests, 134 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||