Yes, however like I mentioned above, I'm holding my expectations for myself higher than he is.
Dec 28, 2010 20:20 | #31 Yes, however like I mentioned above, I'm holding my expectations for myself higher than he is. http://www.jakegregoirephotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
r.morales Goldmember 2,296 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Bay Area Calif More info | Dec 28, 2010 21:03 | #32 good for you , good enough gets you no where .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
runninmann what the heck do I know? More info | Dec 29, 2010 07:40 | #33 runninmann wrote in post #11530976 Well, based on his expectations, is 35 wide enough? jakeg1999 wrote in post #11531475 Yes, however like I mentioned above, I'm holding my expectations for myself higher than he is. So, will a wider lens help you hold your expectations higher than the primary shooter's expectations of his secondary shooter and still satisfy his expectations?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 29, 2010 08:20 | #34 runninmann wrote in post #11533942 So, will a wider lens help you hold your expectations higher than the primary shooter's expectations of his secondary shooter and still satisfy his expectations? Yes, of course it would, but remember this is a situation of me balancing my debt. I do realize that the 17-40 would get used at a wedding. I'm just trying to figure out if my 35l will work for me for now until I can truly afford the lens. I could probably live with myself for missing a couple wide grand congregation shots, but not group, or people shots. http://www.jakegregoirephotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
anthony11 Goldmember 2,148 posts Joined Mar 2009 More info | Dec 29, 2010 10:39 | #35 Permanentlyjakeg1999 wrote in post #11534088 Yes, of course it would, but remember this is a situation of me balancing my debt. I do realize that the 17-40 would get used at a wedding. I'm just trying to figure out if my 35l will work for me for now until I can truly afford the lens. I could probably live with myself for missing a couple wide grand congregation shots, but not group, or people shots. Depending on the setting and available space, I'd think a 35 might be too wide for groups - you'll get some perspective distortion on the sides. 5D2, 24-105L, 85mm f/1.8, MP960, HG21, crumbling G6+R72, Brownian toddler
LOG IN TO REPLY |
r.morales Goldmember 2,296 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Bay Area Calif More info | Dec 29, 2010 10:55 | #36 |
TimSnow Member 231 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Montreal More info | Dec 30, 2010 20:42 | #37 OP - My advice would be to rent (or borrow) a 24-70 f/2.8 and shoot the wedding with that. Once you get home, upload the images and use Lightroom to read the exif and see which focal length you used the most. Decide from there; you may find that you stick around one focal length and that would be the lens for you. I find I hover around 24mm, so my next purchase will be a 24mm f/1.4. 1dMkIII, 5dMkII, 16-35, 24-70, 70-200 f/2.8IS II, 15mm fish, 24 1.4, 50 f/1.4, 135 f/2, 580 II, 550, PW Mini's Flex's and Plus II's, Think Tank AI V2.0, Think Tank Skin, Alien Bees -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 30, 2010 21:04 | #38 I've had the 24-70, and while a great lens, it just wasn't for me. My lens of choice right now is the 35L. I really like the focal length. I have not really put my 85L to test yet, but from what I have seen from it so far, it's a great lens, very sharp. I think I will be ok with the lenses I have now. I am sure after my first wedding I will find out if I need to alter my lens kit or just add to it. For now I am just going to keep an eye out for a decent deal on a nice 17-40 for the really wide large shots. http://www.jakegregoirephotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1218 guests, 135 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||