Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 14 Jan 2011 (Friday) 21:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Kaity

 
RomanC02
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
19 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Orange County
     
Jan 14, 2011 21:17 |  #1

comments and critiques encouraged and welcomed :)

IMAGE: http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a344/o0doeiboio0/kaity2.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
silvermaxd
Senior Member
Avatar
255 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: New Albany,Indiana
     
Jan 14, 2011 23:26 |  #2

it would have been better w/o the watch


My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
didgit
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Likes: 513
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Essex
     
Jan 15, 2011 01:18 |  #3

Interesting tatoo although i had to google to find out what it means.
I agree the watch is a bit distracting.



http://www.flickr.com/​photos/didgit/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cjj14u
Senior Member
604 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Knoxville, TN
     
Jan 15, 2011 07:56 |  #4

Watch & tatoo are distracting. Would be a good image without the watch & PP the tat...


T1i X 2| T3i | 55-250is II | 18-55is II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alejandrophotos
Member
Avatar
123 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 15, 2011 08:14 |  #5

May be this pic is a watch advertisement


My Facebook: http://www.facebook.co​m/anhthaipham (external link)
My Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/thaipham/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RomanC02
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
19 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Orange County
     
Jan 17, 2011 20:06 as a reply to  @ Alejandrophotos's post |  #6

I agree the watch is a bit distracting , and she wanted her tattoo in the shot =/




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barryflht
Member
Avatar
47 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Upstate, SC
     
Jan 17, 2011 20:21 as a reply to  @ RomanC02's post |  #7

I appreciate nice watches... I found this one very nice and added to the photo.


450D/XSi, Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S IS, Canon 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 EF-S IS, Canon 85mm 1.8, Canon 35mm f/2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrleesb
Member
Avatar
87 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
     
Jan 17, 2011 20:30 |  #8

I didn't notice the watch or the tattoos


1DMKIII, 24-105 F4L, 70-200 F4L, 50 F1.4, 2 580EXII, 3 PW Plus II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aemravan
Goldmember
1,622 posts
Likes: 420
Joined Jun 2010
     
Jan 17, 2011 21:34 |  #9

What watch..? tattoo? huh??

:)


Canon 5Diii - Canon 24-70 2.8L - Canon 100 2.8L Macro - Sigma 50 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Condax
Member
206 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2009
     
Jan 17, 2011 21:58 |  #10

As it has been said before...I would have been ok without the watch...it actually covers up a part of her tattoo...


Canon 5D Mark II, Canon 24-105L, Canon 135L, Canon 40D, Canon 50 f/1.4, Tokina 12-24

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kuraz
Senior Member
624 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Louisiana
     
Jan 17, 2011 22:04 |  #11

I dont know what I look at first the watch, tat, or the gold top.

I think it is a little too tight of a crop but that is purely my opinion. I like the lighting and the pose and smile tho.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Freedom211
Senior Member
Avatar
608 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Yorktown, Virginia
     
Jan 18, 2011 01:13 |  #12

Agree with the watch comments, but keep the tattoo in, PP tattoos is dumb in my opinion if you don't like the tattoos get a different model. Simple as that. Being a tattoo artist myself, we the tattoo society love our art. If the photographer doesn't then they shouldn't of shot the model.


http://www.jayhughesph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
supernova74
Senior Member
Avatar
957 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Jan 18, 2011 07:48 |  #13

cjj14u wrote in post #11645556 (external link)
Watch & tatoo are distracting. Would be a good image without the watch & PP the tat...

Agree with the watch but not the tat. That is who she is. It means something to her. I think it would be a much more powerfull shot with just the tat.


Mark
Canon 5DMKII. 50D. EF 70-200 f2.8 II L, EF 24-70 L, 50mm f/1.8 II, Speedlite 580EX II, 15mm Fisheye
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tobylee
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
     
Jan 18, 2011 09:15 |  #14

I agree that the watch is where my eye runs to right off in the photo so if its not a watch advertisement I would lose the watch.

Freedom211 wrote in post #11663653 (external link)
Agree with the watch comments, but keep the tattoo in, PP tattoos is dumb in my opinion if you don't like the tattoos get a different model. Simple as that. Being a tattoo artist myself, we the tattoo society love our art. If the photographer doesn't then they shouldn't of shot the model.

I completely agree... People do not choose to spend the $$$ to put something they consider beautiful of their body to have a photographer or someone else that doesn't like the ink to cover it up... I may not spend even 1/100 of the time infront of the lens that I do behind it. But if I hire you to take my photo accept my ink its a reflection of me. If you hire me... well then we will talk.

Just my 0.02 cents.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
macroshooter1970
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,494 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
     
Jan 18, 2011 09:36 |  #15

The watch doesn't fit in very well. Nothing wrong with a tattoo, not sure why people cry about them. Everything else is fine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,232 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Kaity
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Dannal01
847 guests, 191 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.