Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 08 Apr 2010 (Thursday) 00:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How to Optimize Your Photos for Myspace/Facebook

 
sctbiggs
Goldmember
1,793 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: North Carolina
     
Jan 18, 2011 10:45 |  #16

people still use myspace...

Facebook's size is 720 px at it's longest side. That's 20 extra pixels. :)


Baby Girl 2.0 has arrived!
Facebook (external link) | Wilmington, NC Wedding and Portrait Photographers (external link) - The seriously outdated website.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dereksalem
Member
119 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Jan 18, 2011 12:31 |  #17

Erik_L wrote in post #9954745 (external link)
Jack, the idea is that YOU do the crippling compression, rather than have Facebook/MySpaces JPG processor do it with worse results. Space, in this case, has nothing to do with it.

I have been doing this, but forgot about he 72 DPI thing. good info!

I've just let Facebook resize the pictures and haven't had much of a problem. Doesn't degrade the quality very much at all...They're all sharpened and PP'd enough that the small amount of compression Facebook uses is somewhat irrelevant. We're not using Facebook for professional uses anyway, are we?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chen5108
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Seattle
     
Jan 18, 2011 12:32 |  #18

Thanks for the info on the OP, it has helped much!


www.brianschen.com (external link)

Canon 5dmkII | Canon 7D | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS |EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS MkII | EF 35mm f/1.4L | 430EX | 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thecackster
Senior Member
Avatar
915 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 96
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
     
Jan 18, 2011 13:37 |  #19

sctbiggs wrote in post #11665549 (external link)
people still use myspace...

Facebook's size is 720 px at it's longest side. That's 20 extra pixels. :)

FACT, the old size was 604 or something dumb, but now it's been bumped up to 720.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fashioneyes
Senior Member
Avatar
562 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
     
Jan 18, 2011 13:42 |  #20

... but am I correct in thinking DPI has no effect whatsoever ?


1D4, 7D, 5D2 + L lenses
Links: Jepson Photography (external link) / Model Portfolio (external link)
A-Plant BSB Team (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sctbiggs
Goldmember
1,793 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: North Carolina
     
Jan 18, 2011 13:54 |  #21

fashioneyes wrote in post #11666624 (external link)
... but am I correct in thinking DPI has no effect whatsoever ?

What's DPI? :D


Baby Girl 2.0 has arrived!
Facebook (external link) | Wilmington, NC Wedding and Portrait Photographers (external link) - The seriously outdated website.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fashioneyes
Senior Member
Avatar
562 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
     
Jan 18, 2011 14:01 |  #22

DPI (external link)


1D4, 7D, 5D2 + L lenses
Links: Jepson Photography (external link) / Model Portfolio (external link)
A-Plant BSB Team (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sctbiggs
Goldmember
1,793 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: North Carolina
     
Jan 18, 2011 14:02 |  #23

fashioneyes wrote in post #11666770 (external link)
DPI (external link)

lol... i was joking. meaning... i agree with you


Baby Girl 2.0 has arrived!
Facebook (external link) | Wilmington, NC Wedding and Portrait Photographers (external link) - The seriously outdated website.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JackStrutz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
506 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Temecula, CA
     
Jan 18, 2011 16:55 |  #24

fashioneyes wrote in post #11666624 (external link)
... but am I correct in thinking DPI has no effect whatsoever ?

Not necessarily. Added DPI means larger file size. Larger file size means Facebook/Myspace will apply greater compression to it in order to decrease the file size to a reasonable size on their servers. This means that, when you could've just decreased the size yourself using Photoshop's clearly superior compression mechanism, you allow Facebook to do it.


Gear | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JackStrutz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
506 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Temecula, CA
     
Jan 18, 2011 16:57 |  #25

Dereksalem wrote in post #11666181 (external link)
I've just let Facebook resize the pictures and haven't had much of a problem. Doesn't degrade the quality very much at all...They're all sharpened and PP'd enough that the small amount of compression Facebook uses is somewhat irrelevant. We're not using Facebook for professional uses anyway, are we?

Some people use it as a marketing tool. I for one have gotten several jobs via Facebook. It is especially useful when you are mainly marketing to a younger audience.


Gear | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
granitestorm
Member
Avatar
66 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Jacksonville, FL
     
Jan 18, 2011 18:22 |  #26

JackStrutz wrote in post #11668027 (external link)
Not necessarily. Added DPI means larger file size. Larger file size means Facebook/Myspace will apply greater compression to it in order to decrease the file size to a reasonable size on their servers. This means that, when you could've just decreased the size yourself using Photoshop's clearly superior compression mechanism, you allow Facebook to do it.

How does DPI change the file size on a picture where you've manually defined how many pixels are involved?

On an image with a fixed amount of pixels, changing the DPI setting would alter the print size, but the file size would be unchanged.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZGeorge
Goldmember
Avatar
2,668 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 761
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Southen Arizona
     
Jan 18, 2011 19:19 |  #27

granitestorm wrote in post #11668539 (external link)
On an image with a fixed amount of pixels, changing the DPI setting would alter the print size, but the file size would be unchanged.

100% correct.


George
Democracy Dies in Darkness

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,460 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
How to Optimize Your Photos for Myspace/Facebook
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is droneworx
927 guests, 210 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.