Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 18 Jan 2011 (Tuesday) 18:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7D Sigma 30mm 1:1.4 DC HSM OOF?

 
Badgerballs
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2005
Location: East Sussex, England
     
Jan 18, 2011 18:27 |  #1

I have been using this lens with my 30D and only ever had fantastic results. I have now upgraded to a 7D and all of my shots seem OOF.
Any ideas any fixes?

I have something funny going on here. I have the beep turned on and focus manually and I get the green light flash and then a beep. I focus on AF and it doesn't get a green box or beep but you can here it searching for focus and stops as if it has acquired focus.

Well I have just tried it indoors with reasonable lighting with my tokina 12-24 and again on AF it doesn't focus lock(beep) yet if I do it manually it works. Have I got a duff one?


"Try shooting badgers, creep up in the dark, they hear the shutter, the flash goes off, they run, and what's the shot... "Badgerballs" !!!!
The difference between good and bad photographers is: Good photographers don't show their bad photos.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HighPixel
Goldmember
Avatar
2,065 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Bonney Lake, WA
     
Jan 18, 2011 20:59 |  #2

Micro adjustment on the 7D...try that.


No longer actively shooting...
Canon EOS-1DMk.III
| Canon EOS-5DMk.II / BG-E6 | Canon 70-200 2.8LIS Mk.II | 24-70 2.8L | 16-35 2.8LII | Just all kinds of crap...|RonBaltazar.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
speedline_fc
Senior Member
Avatar
282 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: So Cal
     
Jan 19, 2011 00:03 |  #3

are you sure the 7D isnt in AI Servo? thats what it sounds like

not sure about your OOF issue.. micro focus adjustmet as HighPixel recommended.. or maybe post a sample?


My Flickr (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=9822373#p​ost9822373

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyman
Sleepless in Hampshire
Avatar
14,414 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 75
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Hampshire UK
     
Jan 19, 2011 03:45 |  #4

There are various C-Fn relating to focus as well as the various focus modes on the 7D, could be any one of a dozen reasons why you are having trouble. I suggest setting it to single focus point, and one shot focus and try that. You need to do some serious manual reading to get to grips withthe focus system.


Art that takes you there. http://www.artyman.co.​uk (external link)
Ken
Canon 7D, 350D, 15-85, 18-55, 75-300, Cosina 100 Macro, Sigma 120-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,397 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 389
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Jan 19, 2011 04:02 |  #5

I had the exact same problem with my Siggy 30mm when I switched from my 30D to a 7D - where my lens would focus very nicely and be tack sharp on the 30D it was awful with the 7D. A large amount of Micro Adjustment has solved the problem but it is odd that there is so much difference.


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Badgerballs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2005
Location: East Sussex, England
     
Jan 19, 2011 04:28 |  #6

Mike wrote in post #11670857 (external link)
I had the exact same problem with my Siggy 30mm when I switched from my 30D to a 7D - where my lens would focus very nicely and be tack sharp on the 30D it was awful with the 7D. A large amount of Micro Adjustment has solved the problem but it is odd that there is so much difference.

Hooray at last someone with the same problem. I was about to take the 7D back as I thought it was faulty. Can you tell me what your micro adjustment is as it would be interesting to compare figures.
Also how did you do it did you use some sort of chart or trial and error?


"Try shooting badgers, creep up in the dark, they hear the shutter, the flash goes off, they run, and what's the shot... "Badgerballs" !!!!
The difference between good and bad photographers is: Good photographers don't show their bad photos.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,397 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 389
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Jan 19, 2011 04:47 |  #7

I did mine by trial and error. I was close to binning the Sigma and fell out of love with it for a good 9 months or so - I just didn't trust it any more. After spending some time MAing it was all ironed out and I like it again! (Still, the idea of the 35L is still nagging at me ;))

I cannot remember off the top of my head how much and which way though...


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Badgerballs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2005
Location: East Sussex, England
     
Jan 19, 2011 06:27 |  #8

Mike wrote in post #11670958 (external link)
I did mine by trial and error. I was close to binning the Sigma and fell out of love with it for a good 9 months or so - I just didn't trust it any more. After spending some time MAing it was all ironed out and I like it again! (Still, the idea of the 35L is still nagging at me ;))

I cannot remember off the top of my head how much and which way though...

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by Mike in
./showthread.php?p=116​70958&i=i145389775
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Yep I know the feeling and I have only had it a week. I love the sigma.
Anyway I have sussed it out. I have just spent half an hour setting the lens up and it is now perfect. I had to set the C.Fn to +12 to get it smack on.
What a flaming palava.
I will now do my Tokina 12-24 and Canon 70-200L.
It will be interesting to see if the Canon needs adjusting.
I wonder if all the lenses need +12 then should I return the camera as that spells a fault to me.


"Try shooting badgers, creep up in the dark, they hear the shutter, the flash goes off, they run, and what's the shot... "Badgerballs" !!!!
The difference between good and bad photographers is: Good photographers don't show their bad photos.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ecce_lex
Senior Member
Avatar
356 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2010
Location: 46.2, 6.1
     
Jan 19, 2011 06:49 |  #9

Same issue here, large amount needed for the sigma 30mm, virtually nothing for the 10-20 and juuuust a tad for the 70-200 (all Sigma).


Schrodinger's cat walked into a bar - and didn't.
Gear: 60mm Takahashi, 200mm C8, 7Dmod, EQ6
Website: https://plus.google.co​m …873112797282158​324/albums (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,667 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8764
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jan 19, 2011 06:51 |  #10

Badgerballs wrote in post #11671137 (external link)
Yep I know the feeling and I have only had it a week. I love the sigma.
Anyway I have sussed it out. I have just spent half an hour setting the lens up and it is now perfect. I had to set the C.Fn to +12 to get it smack on.
What a flaming palava.
I will now do my Tokina 12-24 and Canon 70-200L.
It will be interesting to see if the Canon needs adjusting.
I wonder if all the lenses need +12 then should I return the camera as that spells a fault to me.

Micro adjustments go from -20 to 20, I don't see why lenses all needing double digit adjustments would cause you concern on the body. Yes, it probably means the body needs the slightest of tweaks, but since the capability to do the micro adjustment is there, and you can use it to get the most out of all your lenses, why send it back? Mine is the same way, I used to worry about it, but long since figured that since I am able to adjust each lens with no issues, I don't need to worry about the body.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,397 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 389
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Jan 19, 2011 07:02 |  #11

The Siggy was the only lens that needed any adjustments. All the rest are pretty much spot on. It's very odd!


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Badgerballs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2005
Location: East Sussex, England
     
Jan 19, 2011 07:34 |  #12

Badgerballs wrote in post #11671137 (external link)
Yep I know the feeling and I have only had it a week. I love the sigma.
Anyway I have sussed it out. I have just spent half an hour setting the lens up and it is now perfect. I had to set the C.Fn to +12 to get it smack on.
What a flaming palava.
I will now do my Tokina 12-24 and Canon 70-200L.
It will be interesting to see if the Canon needs adjusting.
I wonder if all the lenses need +12 then should I return the camera as that spells a fault to me.

Well,Well,Well why should I have not guessed!!
Sigma 30mm C.Fn 3:5 +12
Tokina 12-24 " +12
Canon 70-200 " +/-0

Read into that what you will.


"Try shooting badgers, creep up in the dark, they hear the shutter, the flash goes off, they run, and what's the shot... "Badgerballs" !!!!
The difference between good and bad photographers is: Good photographers don't show their bad photos.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Badgerballs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2005
Location: East Sussex, England
     
Jan 19, 2011 07:38 |  #13

TeamSpeed wrote in post #11671201 (external link)
Micro adjustments go from -20 to 20, I don't see why lenses all needing double digit adjustments would cause you concern on the body. Yes, it probably means the body needs the slightest of tweaks, but since the capability to do the micro adjustment is there, and you can use it to get the most out of all your lenses, why send it back? Mine is the same way, I used to worry about it, but long since figured that since I am able to adjust each lens with no issues, I don't need to worry about the body.

Yep I totally agree with you. I must admit if all my lenses were +12 then it would obviously show a bias and tells me the camera needs adjusting as technically it would reduce your +range to 8 points which may mean a lens could fall outside.
But since my third party lenses were both +12 but the Canon was +/-0 then I am no longer worried.


"Try shooting badgers, creep up in the dark, they hear the shutter, the flash goes off, they run, and what's the shot... "Badgerballs" !!!!
The difference between good and bad photographers is: Good photographers don't show their bad photos.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pknight
Goldmember
Avatar
2,693 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Jan 19, 2011 07:49 |  #14

Badgerballs wrote in post #11671325 (external link)
Well,Well,Well why should I have not guessed!!
Sigma 30mm C.Fn 3:5 +12
Tokina 12-24 " +12
Canon 70-200 " +/-0

Read into that what you will.

At what focal lengths did you MA the zooms? The general opinion seems to be that a zoom might have different MA requirements at different focal lengths. The only lens I have MAed is my 100-400, and since I nearly always have it at 400mm, I didn't worry about other focal lengths, but I could see how you would be likely to use yours at a range of FLs.


Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hieu1004
Goldmember
Avatar
3,579 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Seattle
     
Jan 19, 2011 07:52 |  #15

Mike wrote in post #11670857 (external link)
I had the exact same problem with my Siggy 30mm when I switched from my 30D to a 7D - where my lens would focus very nicely and be tack sharp on the 30D it was awful with the 7D. A large amount of Micro Adjustment has solved the problem but it is odd that there is so much difference.

I had this experience as well. Worked fine on my T1i, 40D and my friend's 5D2, but needed MA on my 7D and another (different) 5D2. Different lens + body combo have different results.


-Hieu
Gear | Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,355 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
7D Sigma 30mm 1:1.4 DC HSM OOF?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is J.K.T.
1263 guests, 206 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.