As wide as you have or can afford.....and the polarizer suggestion was absolutely straight up.
gmaize Senior Member 589 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii More info | Jan 27, 2011 00:44 | #16 As wide as you have or can afford.....and the polarizer suggestion was absolutely straight up. --gmaize
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rgs- Senior Member ![]() 900 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Jan 27, 2011 01:07 | #17 Islands62 wrote in post #11722831 ![]() I live here and I use the 17-50 Tamron as my main lens, but if you want surf or beach shots a 70-200 will serve you well. Keep off the highway at rush hour and have a good time! If you want to rent lenses lighthaus camera is somewhat close to Waikiki and rentals run $10-$30 a day. i cant seem to find anything on their site about rentals Ryan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Islands62 Member 48 posts Joined Jan 2011 More info | Jan 27, 2011 02:20 | #18
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jardiniboy Senior Member 508 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Waipahu, Hawaii More info | Jan 27, 2011 02:51 | #19 My selection would be something like the Canon 17-85 IS or the newer 15-85 IS. If you're on a tight budget get the 17-85 if you have a little more cash go with the newer 15-85.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jericobot Cream of the Crop ![]() 5,128 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 Location: preppingforthetrumpets More info | Jan 27, 2011 03:19 | #20 You'll need wide more than anything, trust me. You'll come to a point and ask yourself why did I bring my other lenses. Enjoy your trip α7ii + (batis 25 f2 / zeiss 55 f1,8 / macro 90 f2,8)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Staszek Goldmember ![]() 3,606 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2010 Location: San Jose, CA More info | Jan 27, 2011 03:41 | #21 I had the 24-105 on my 7D and LOVED the thing. Then I realized how much wide angle I was missing. The 17-40 or 17-55 could work as a one lens wonder (the 17-55 will be better with IS and wider aperture). I bet you will want a little extra reach though so I will suggest: Jardiniboy wrote in post #11723265 ![]() My selection would be something like the Canon 17-85 IS or the newer 15-85 IS. If you're on a tight budget get the 17-85 if you have a little more cash go with the newer 15-85. I live in Hawaii and when I shoot just for fun and want to carry light I would go with my 17-85 and XT. IMO it's a great walk around set-up. With the newer 4-stop IS in the 15-85 it's really useful in low light. My reason why I didn't pick the ultimate EF-S lens the 17-55 IS is because when you're going to be shooting all these locations in Hawaii, you're not going to be shooting at f/2.8. You'll be shooting usually at f/8 or f/11 which defeats the purpose of having the f/2.8. Also, if you're planning to rent beside lighthaus there's Hawaii Photo Rental. http://www.hawaiicamera.com/rentals/canon/oahu ![]() SOSKIphoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stu46 Goldmember ![]() 2,227 posts Likes: 27 Joined Mar 2006 Location: Hawaii More info | Jan 27, 2011 05:07 | #22 I highly recommend renting from Josh at Hawaii Photo Rental We offer an easy to use online booking system for you to reserve your equipment ahead of time. You can come by our convenient location on Oahu or Maui. If you're staying on another island, we'll simply ship right to your door.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
coirchlid Senior Member ![]() 384 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2010 Location: O'ahu, Hawaii More info | Jan 27, 2011 05:34 | #23 +1 for Hawaii Photo Rental. That's where I always rent. Though, to my knowledge, they don't carry the 15-85. I just checked and they have the 10-22, 17-55, and 24-105 in stock. If you want to rent the 17-55 maybe you should reserve soon, since I've been really wanting to get my hands on it. I know they have multiple copies of certain lenses though, but I don't know exactly which ones. -Matt G
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 27, 2011 09:19 | #24 Jericobot wrote in post #11723346 ![]() You'll need wide more than anything, trust me. You'll come to a point and ask yourself why did I bring my other lenses. Enjoy your trip I definitely did use my Tamron 28-75 a lot more than my 70-200 while I was on Maui. I'd say most of my shots were wide to middle, or up close of people, foliage, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 27, 2011 10:57 | #25 Thanks for the suggestions guys. I'm definitely conflicted on this one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thedge Senior Member 417 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Jan 27, 2011 11:55 | #26 I didnt have an SLR when I went there the first time, but if I went back id bring a wide angle and something like the 17-55. Dont really recall needing a telephoto for many situations. 7D - 100-400 L, Sigma 28, Sigma 17-70 2.8-4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scott M Goldmember More info | Jan 27, 2011 11:58 | #27 joemitchem wrote in post #11724977 ![]() Thanks for the suggestions guys. I'm definitely conflicted on this one. I'm 99% sure that I'm going to go ahead and get the 24-105 either way as I had that lens before and loved it. Whether or not it goes to Hawaii with me is still up in the air. Right now, I'm considering the 10-22 (which I also had before) and the 24-105. I really dont see myself needing anything longer than the 105 but I know I'll regret saying that. Also considering the 15-85 as many have suggested but I'm not sure where that would fit in with my other ideas. The main thing is that this is NOT a photo vacation, its a family vacation. I know my family gets tired of waiting around while I switch lenses back and forth so I'm just trying to find the most versatile 2 lenses (at most) that give me the most flexibility. If you want to simplify with a single lens, then the EF-S 15-85 would be your best bet. That focal range will handle just about everything you'll want to shoot on Oahu. If you settle on the 24-105L, you really should take a 10-22 along to cover the wide angle, and be prepared to switch lenses quite a bit.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jardiniboy Senior Member 508 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Waipahu, Hawaii More info | Jan 27, 2011 12:47 | #28 joemitchem wrote in post #11724977 ![]() Thanks for the suggestions guys. I'm definitely conflicted on this one. I'm 99% sure that I'm going to go ahead and get the 24-105 either way as I had that lens before and loved it. Whether or not it goes to Hawaii with me is still up in the air. Right now, I'm considering the 10-22 (which I also had before) and the 24-105. I really dont see myself needing anything longer than the 105 but I know I'll regret saying that. Also considering the 15-85 as many have suggested but I'm not sure where that would fit in with my other ideas. The main thing is that this is NOT a photo vacation, its a family vacation. I know my family gets tired of waiting around while I switch lenses back and forth so I'm just trying to find the most versatile 2 lenses (at most) that give me the most flexibility. For a vacation the 15-85 is perfect. It's wide plus it's quite long if you feel that you're too far away try to walk closer. If you're not close enough then crop in PP. When shooting in Hawaii, almost 90% of the time that's the range you're going to be in. I currently have the 17-40, 70-200, and the 17-85 and when I go out to shoot for fun that lens is what I always grab first.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shutterpat Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Jan 27, 2011 12:48 | #29 ....a 17-50 & 70-200. Shaka, brahhhh. Mahalo. Follow me --> https://www.instagram.com/shutterpat/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Don't drive - take "The Bus",meet interesting people and let someone else do the driving.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is Cutiepiewee 1113 guests, 194 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |