
[URL=http://www.flickr.com/photos/56475569@N07/5391574359/]
Jan 26, 2011 23:16 | #1 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/56475569@N07/5391574359/ ![]() [URL=http://www.flickr.com/photos/56475569@N07/5391574359/] 5D MK III; 24-70 L 2.8 II USM; 70-200 L 2.8 USM II; 580 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mpphotography Member 101 posts Joined Jul 2010 More info | Jan 27, 2011 12:05 | #2 I can relate to this image - it seems to be really difficult to get a good shot during the winter in this kind of light. You caught a nice separation of your subject from the background, not always easy to do with trees. http://mpaulphotography.wordpress.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 27, 2011 15:30 | #3 Thanks very much for your response/input. I see what you mean and it makes a lot of sense. ![]() 5D MK III; 24-70 L 2.8 II USM; 70-200 L 2.8 USM II; 580 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 27, 2011 15:39 | #4 took this other one. I think my monitor might be a bit too bright because they do seem a bit underexposed ![]() 5D MK III; 24-70 L 2.8 II USM; 70-200 L 2.8 USM II; 580 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Phrasikleia Goldmember ![]() 1,828 posts Likes: 14 Joined May 2008 Location: Based in California and Slovenia More info | Jan 27, 2011 15:40 | #5 ^^Better, but it would be better still if there were some light hitting the tree, preferably 'good' light from a low sun. Photography by Erin Babnik
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 27, 2011 16:05 | #6 ^^Thank you, great points and taking notes..... 5D MK III; 24-70 L 2.8 II USM; 70-200 L 2.8 USM II; 580 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Crystal W Photography Senior Member ![]() 500 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2011 Location: PA More info | Jan 28, 2011 10:19 | #7 1. too dark. Crystal
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 28, 2011 18:42 | #8 Crystal, thanks for your input. I forgot to mention before that I had a circular polarizing filter which I'm sure contributed to the overall darkness of the shots. Btw, thanks for the links and nice shots. I find trees to be interesting and cool to photograph. 5D MK III; 24-70 L 2.8 II USM; 70-200 L 2.8 USM II; 580 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CallumPhoto Senior Member ![]() 661 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Jan 29, 2011 00:42 | #9 |
Jan 29, 2011 01:01 | #10 I think this looks better. Lmk ![]() D7 24-105L f8 1/250s 200 ISO @24mm No flash 5D MK III; 24-70 L 2.8 II USM; 70-200 L 2.8 USM II; 580 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CallumPhoto Senior Member ![]() 661 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Jan 29, 2011 01:07 | #11 |
Jan 29, 2011 01:19 | #12 Thank you, I def agree. I'm using a mac and my display is pretty bright...think I need to adjust it. ![]() 5D MK III; 24-70 L 2.8 II USM; 70-200 L 2.8 USM II; 580 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is rush1981 575 guests, 195 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |