Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 02 Feb 2011 (Wednesday) 06:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

24mm f/1.4L and 35mm f/1.4L - What's the difference

 
hieu1004
Goldmember
Avatar
3,579 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Seattle
     
Feb 02, 2011 10:03 |  #16

^I've shot both side by side. Any color variation is absolutely negligible. There is VERY little difference.


-Hieu
Gear | Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
hieu1004
Goldmember
Avatar
3,579 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Seattle
     
Feb 02, 2011 10:03 |  #17

mdgrwl wrote in post #11762556 (external link)
I thought that would get your attention... :p

Indeed. :lol::lol::lol:


-Hieu
Gear | Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JonK
Goldmember
Avatar
2,161 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2004
Location: PA USA
     
Feb 02, 2011 10:22 |  #18

The 24L II looks badass w/o the hood


7NE | 7D | 5DII | 16-35/2.8L II | 24/1.4L II | TS-E 24/3.5L II | 50/1.4 | 85/1.2L II | 100/2.8L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 400/5.6L | PIXMA Pro 9500 Mark II
check my blog:
www.jonkensy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ilumo
Goldmember
1,739 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Oct 2009
     
Feb 02, 2011 11:24 |  #19

JonK wrote in post #11762736 (external link)
The 24L II looks badass w/o the hood

if you care about looks, the 85L probably looks the baddest unless you go to the telephotos... or the 14L. of course that's JMO :)


Body: Sony a7R IV
Glass: 50mm f/1.8 | 35mm f/1.4L USM | 16-35 f/4.0 IS USML USM | 24-70 f/2.8L II USM | 24-105 f/4.0L IS USM | 70-200 f/2.8L II IS USM | 85mm f/1.4L IS USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS USM | 24mm f/1.4GM | 70-200mm f/2.8GM | Samyang 85mm f/1.4 | Voigtlander 10mm f/5.6
Accessories: 430 EX II, 600 EX, tripods, umbrellas, and other goodies.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ilumo
Goldmember
1,739 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Oct 2009
     
Feb 02, 2011 11:24 |  #20

Spaniard wrote in post #11762048 (external link)
The 24L MKII colors are better.

please explain... or SHOW us :)


Body: Sony a7R IV
Glass: 50mm f/1.8 | 35mm f/1.4L USM | 16-35 f/4.0 IS USML USM | 24-70 f/2.8L II USM | 24-105 f/4.0L IS USM | 70-200 f/2.8L II IS USM | 85mm f/1.4L IS USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS USM | 24mm f/1.4GM | 70-200mm f/2.8GM | Samyang 85mm f/1.4 | Voigtlander 10mm f/5.6
Accessories: 430 EX II, 600 EX, tripods, umbrellas, and other goodies.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattjns93
Senior Member
Avatar
765 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
     
Feb 02, 2011 11:36 |  #21

ilumo wrote in post #11763144 (external link)
if you care about looks, the 85L probably looks the baddest unless you go to the telephotos... or the 14L. of course that's JMO :)

Got that right.

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4041/4383964810_b10650c81a_z.jpg?zz=1

5DII | 17-40L | 35L | 85L II | 50 1.8 | 430EX | flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) (Please like it! :D)
Follow my photoblog of my study abroad in Florence! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Terran
Member
151 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Orange County, CA
     
Feb 02, 2011 11:39 |  #22

Holly smokes! It’s like looking into a fish bowl.


| 7D | Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 | 17-55 f/2.8 | 24 f/1.4L II | 60 f/2.8 Macro | 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | EF 2X II | 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JonK
Goldmember
Avatar
2,161 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2004
Location: PA USA
     
Feb 02, 2011 11:47 |  #23

This looks funnier

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


The camera can't even sit flat

7NE | 7D | 5DII | 16-35/2.8L II | 24/1.4L II | TS-E 24/3.5L II | 50/1.4 | 85/1.2L II | 100/2.8L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 400/5.6L | PIXMA Pro 9500 Mark II
check my blog:
www.jonkensy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ilumo
Goldmember
1,739 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Oct 2009
     
Feb 02, 2011 11:47 |  #24

mattjns93 wrote in post #11763213 (external link)
Got that right.
QUOTED IMAGE

it looks even better without that grip. makes the lens look bigger.


Body: Sony a7R IV
Glass: 50mm f/1.8 | 35mm f/1.4L USM | 16-35 f/4.0 IS USML USM | 24-70 f/2.8L II USM | 24-105 f/4.0L IS USM | 70-200 f/2.8L II IS USM | 85mm f/1.4L IS USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS USM | 24mm f/1.4GM | 70-200mm f/2.8GM | Samyang 85mm f/1.4 | Voigtlander 10mm f/5.6
Accessories: 430 EX II, 600 EX, tripods, umbrellas, and other goodies.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ni$mo350
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,011 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Feb 02, 2011 12:00 |  #25

I choose the 35L over the 24L because I don't like the distortion. I feel like 35 is plenty wide enough for me and what I shoot. I've shot portraits/cars/landsca​pes and never felt the need for a wider lens on FF. Different strokes I guess. I also find the 35L's colors to be fantastic and have no desire to pay that much for a lens I won't use.


-Chris-Website (external link)|| (external link)Facebook (external link)|| My Flickr (external link)|| Follow me!!! 500px (external link) || (external link) 5D mkii || 35L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS MKII || My bank account hates you all :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
arentol
Goldmember
1,305 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Seattle WA
     
Feb 02, 2011 12:20 |  #26

TijmenDal wrote in post #11761698 (external link)
...except for me buggering you with, probably stupid, questions....

Sorry to get a little off topic, but For your edification and to try to ensure you don't make this mistake again somewhere where it will get you in actual trouble (especially since it is a short haul from the UK where it is a common term to Amsterdam where you are), this can not go unaddressed.

There is a WORLD of difference between bugging someone and buggering them....

The first means to annoy someone, such as a fly does when it keeps flying near your ear making an annoying buzzing sound.

The second is slang for a specific sexual act, which is analogous (pun intended) to a guy bringing his "special delivery" in through the "exit only" door rather than through the "main entrance".


5D3 | Rokinon 14 f/2.8 | 16-35L II | TS-E 24L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 | Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Voigtlander 40 f/2.0 | Σ 50 f/1.4 | MP-E 65 | 70-200 2.8L IS II | Σ 85 f/1.4 | Zeiss 100 f/2 | Σ 120-300 f/2.8 OS | 580 EX II | 430 EX II | Fuji X10 | OM-D E-M5 | http://www.mikehjphoto​.com/ (external link)
*****Lenses For Sale (external link)*****

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Helena
Goldmember
Avatar
1,385 posts
Likes: 15
Joined May 2008
Location: Trondheim, Norway
     
Feb 02, 2011 12:44 as a reply to  @ post 11762556 |  #27

Spaniard wrote in post #11762048 (external link)
The 24L MKII colors are better.

I used to feel the same way, until I decided to do a comparison shoot a few weeks ago. I was really surprised to find that I couldn't tell them apart (except of course when the difference in focal length was apparent). Both are excellent lenses, and very, very sharp even at f/1.4.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,196 posts
Gallery: 176 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 9420
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Feb 02, 2011 12:48 |  #28

Helena wrote in post #11763691 (external link)
I used to feel the same way, until I decided to do a comparison shoot a few weeks ago. I was really surprised to find that I couldn't tell them apart (except of course when the difference in focal length was apparent). Both are excellent lenses, and very, very sharp even at f/1.4.

Agree and are very different lenses. I have both and love them both and if you are looking for which lens looks bad ass which in my opinion should never be even a thought the 200 2L looks bad ass.

IMAGE: http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/airfrogusmc/IMG_4354.jpg

IMAGE: http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/airfrogusmc/IMG_4355.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ni$mo350
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,011 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Feb 02, 2011 12:58 |  #29

^^ This needs to be tagged NSFW because that's lens PRON right there ;)


-Chris-Website (external link)|| (external link)Facebook (external link)|| My Flickr (external link)|| Follow me!!! 500px (external link) || (external link) 5D mkii || 35L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS MKII || My bank account hates you all :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JonK
Goldmember
Avatar
2,161 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2004
Location: PA USA
     
Feb 02, 2011 13:10 |  #30

200 2? Nawww. 500 4!

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

7NE | 7D | 5DII | 16-35/2.8L II | 24/1.4L II | TS-E 24/3.5L II | 50/1.4 | 85/1.2L II | 100/2.8L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 400/5.6L | PIXMA Pro 9500 Mark II
check my blog:
www.jonkensy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

7,739 views & 0 likes for this thread
24mm f/1.4L and 35mm f/1.4L - What's the difference
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mandom
727 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.